Today's society is overly sexualized.

Author: Mall

Posts

Total: 20
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 336
Posts: 886
3
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
3
4
4
Today's society is overly sexualized.

Several points to make. Starting with the first four.

1. Women on average tend to wear more and more revealing clothing and tight clothing typically to make out the buttocks area.

2. Easy readily excess to explicit content in multiple mediums.

3. Extending sexual behaviors beyond sexual intercourse such as oral sex, anal sex, use of sexual toys, scatology, the use of any bodily part for sexual stimulation.

4. Through t.v., movies, media, less and less restraint on sexual matters, more explicit, less sexual innuendos but more coarse.
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,889
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
Using the same word(s) to mean:
A) mate
B) seriously harm

I wouldn't want to explain that one to the aliens.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,287
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Mall
Women on average tend to wear more and more revealing clothing.
Something not quite right with this statement.

Because the more clothing one wears the less revealing it becomes.


Nonetheless, what you are saying is that in certain societies, attitudes to recreational sex have become more liberal and open.

Of which, you seem to be quite knowledgeable.


Funny how the more sexually repressed, have a tendency to be the more knowledgeable.

Which can only be due to very high levels of relevant data input, challenging formatively acquired data input.


Me...I adore female buttocks areas in tight clothing.

Pert ones though.

Not old flabby saggy ones.



As for scatology.

I learned something new today.

Thanks for imparting some of your extensive sexual knowledge.



Go on...Just get stuck in...You know you want to.

Perhaps avoid the scat.

Hey, I'm just scatologically repressed.
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 269
Posts: 7,703
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@zedvictor4
1. Women on average tend to wear more and more revealing clothing and tight clothing typically to make out the buttocks area.
Well, yeah, they do.


2. Easy readily excess to explicit content in multiple mediums.
You mean porn?

3. Extending sexual behaviors beyond sexual intercourse such as oral sex, anal sex, use of sexual toys, scatology, the use of any bodily part for sexual stimulation.
Well, people find it fun.

4. Through t.v., movies, media, less and less restraint on sexual matters, more explicit, less sexual innuendos but more coarse
Thats just Satan slowly winning.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,135
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

Bugs Have a Kinkier Sex Life Than You Do

ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,290
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@Mall
.." women are attracters, men are pushers"..Bucky Fuller

Symmetrical and/or asymmetrical beauty is attractive to all sexes.

All people want to wear as little clothing as possible, and only factors are the weather, temp etc.

Taliban is good example of moral extreme against the above comments and become the true immorals

 Putin and other extreme against LBGT people an become the true immorals.

Those and their type need to get off their immoral high horse and be re-introduced  morals of decency toward their fellow humans.


Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 269
Posts: 7,703
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
-->
@FLRW
"Flies must rotate on their penis, sometimes even a full 360 degrees, to keep fucking."

"Since female bed bugs don’t have vaginas, the males developed a spear-cock to stab her body."
God is a pervert.
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 336
Posts: 886
3
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
3
4
4
-->
@zedvictor4
In all seriousness, do you believe today's world has become overly sexualized?
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,236
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
Your statement is correct, today's society is hyper sexualized, more than ever. However, I think your thread points to determine if this phenomenon is right or not, in which case I would say the hypersexualization is just a response to people's nature. 

As Victor said, today's society is liberal and free, so don’t expect to find people wearing some sort of chastity device. Men and women like to mess around, it has always been like this because sex is delicious. If you don't get bricked when a chick passes by showing her cake, you have a serious problem.

The difference between the present and the past is that in the past sex was almost a taboo, now it's not.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,135
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@IlDiavolo

Well stated.
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 336
Posts: 886
3
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
3
4
4
Yes today's world is over sexualized I agree. Apparently obvious and interesting how times have changed and continue to evolve.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,287
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Mall
In all seriousness.

A. I don't believe.

B. The World?

Nope the Global community is largely still sexually repressed by formative conditioning.

I would suggest, that if the whole of society was conditioned to be totally open about bodies and their natural functions, then there wouldn't be an issue.

The problem is  in the minds of the repressed.
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 336
Posts: 886
3
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
3
4
4
-->
@zedvictor4
So you're saying no , today's world is not over sexualized.
What type of condition, traits does the world have to have or be in for it to be over sexualized?

-or 

Is there a such thing in your mind? 
Is it impossible to have over sexualization?
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,287
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
I  answered this question.

Nonetheless I will rephrase if you like.

No, the majority of the human race is not over-sexualized.

The majority of the human race remains sexually repressed, due to how the majority of the human race is conditioned.

You are responding to the actions of a few narcissists and exhibishionists who seek to glorify a supposedly liberal media with their antics.

As I suggested, a truly liberal person would not need to perform in this way.
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 336
Posts: 886
3
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
3
4
4
-->
@zedvictor4
"No, the majority of the human race is not over-sexualized."

Hold it hold it you say you answered the question but the question was asking about the world not specifically the majority of it.

Now you've got a split answer. So by saying majority, does that make the minority overly sexualized?
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,287
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Mall
You keep saying "The World".

By which, I assume you are referring to the entirety of the human race.

Therefore if only one human was not over-sexualised, then you statement would be incorrect.

 
Nonetheless how does one calculate a scale of human over-sexualisation?

Or more importantly, who is qualified to calculate scales of human over-sexualisation?

And who considers themselves to be qualified to judge someone else's attitude towards sexuality?

The answer being, the sexually over-repressed, with a background steeped in repressive ideology and social repression....Which of course is no qualification at all.

But rather an under-qualification.


The simple fact is, that times and attitudes are slowly changing... And "the World's" attitude towards sexuality will be it's own judge.





Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 336
Posts: 886
3
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
3
4
4
-->
@zedvictor4
So by saying majority, does that make the minority overly sexualized?
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,287
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Mall
No.

I would suggest that relative to ideological and  cultural development, attitudes towards sexuality have always varied.


So let me ask you a question.

Would you agree that relative to ideological and cultural development, a proportion of the human race is sexually repressed?


If you think about it logically, the developed concepts of nakedness and embarrassment, relative to sexual functionality are a tad unnecessary.

Though, one must always temper such statements by adding that everything that occurs within a Universe may or may not be necessary.
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 336
Posts: 886
3
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
3
4
4
-->
@zedvictor4
I just want to make sure I understand you answer. The majority of the world is not overly sexualized but then you say the minority isn't either.

So the original answer you mean the entire world because it's neither the majority or minority. 

"Would you agree that relative to ideological and cultural development, a proportion of the human race is sexually repressed?"

I couldn't say. I'm aware that people are active, others aren't for whatever reason.

That is a good question as to why anyone is embarrassed to be without clothing completely to be bare naked.

But no doubt that just about everywhere you look particularly in the north western hemisphere, sexual depiction is at the forefront in media, advertising, in how clothes are designed typically for women .

Fifty to sixty years ago, there was more modest apparel. Things were left more to the imagination. I saw in the news one of the cast members from an old sitcom from the fifties just passed on. 

If I could ask her what she thought about 2024 compared to 1954 in what she wore then and the changes now, I'd be all ears .

This type of clothing where you can make out every curve, crevice, bust , where as with dresses that would extend out to not be so revealing, extraordinary contrast.


zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,287
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Mall
Well, I suggested that a minority chose to be exhibitionists, and a majority were still repressed by old style conditioning.

I would further suggest that over-sexualisation is merely an assumption, that contrasts with ideas of under-sexualisation or normal-sexualisation.

How one adorns one's body with clothing is a separate issue, and not necessarily an indicator of levels of sexualisation. But perhaps more of an indicator of where we are at in terms of social development.

Though as I also previously questioned, who or what sets the criteria and therefore the standards for sexualisation.

I would finally suggest that as ever, the repressed are the ones who always try to set and maintain criteria and standards, whereas the progressives are the ones who challenge old style thinking.


Though If you think about it logically, developing an indifferent attitude towards the human body and it's functionality, is perhaps more likely to result in  a desexualised way of thinking...Whereas sexual repression only perpetuates emotional and physical angst.