Trump is an insurrectionist

Author: IwantRooseveltagain

Posts

Total: 335
#31
Sam_Flynn
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 121
0
2
4
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Sam_Flynn
0
2
4
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
“Colorado’s top court concluded in December that the attack was an insurrection 
They do not have the authority to make such a declaration. None. Especially in light of the FACT that the F.B.I. declared that there was NO evidence to substantiate J6 as a so-called "insurrection." Stop calling J6 an Insurrection.

that Trump is an insurrectionist 
Since J6 was NOT an insurrection, Trump is NOT an insurrectionist. 
He was even tried via the House and acquitted of 'inciting an insurrection.'
Again, NO insurrection. 

who is barred by the Constitution from serving as president again. The Colorado justices ruled he could not appear on the state’s primary ballot but put their decision on hold while Trump pursued an appeal“
That's not how the 14th Sec. 3 works. There is no specific mention of the Office either the President OR Vice President. Those justices are ignorant of Constitutional Law and how to read/interpret it. 

Trump was charged with insurrection in his second impeachment. A jury of biased Republicans, who decided to acquit 
At least you can admit he was acquitted. So, this is a none issue then. 

Mitch McConnell then stated that Trump should be charged for his crime once he was out of office.
He is not an authority on anything and his subjective opinion carries no legal weight, or political weight for that matter. 

insurrection as it was understood in the 1860s was “any public use of force or a threat of force by a group of people to hinder the execution of the law.”
Not how it works, buddy. You may think of yourself of as a pseudo constitutional law scholar, but you know nothing about the Constitution. I mean really, 'public use of force'? LOL!!! You really need to do some legislative historical research on that amendment, learn the legal definitions and not a layman's understanding of the term. 

“It was never considered an element of Section 3 that you need a criminal conviction,” he said, noting that after the Civil War many former Confederates were disqualified from office even though they had not been charged with insurrection or treason”
No shit, but a legitimate law-based organization/agency needs to have emphatically declared J6 as an insurrection. None have. The courts do not have the authority to do that. Courts do not file charges, law agencies do. Cops. DA's. DOJ. FBI. Etc. And since none have, J6 was NOT and never will be an 'insurrection.'
#32
Sam_Flynn
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 121
0
2
4
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Sam_Flynn
0
2
4
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Well genius, Trump couldn’t possibly be President in 2024
He will be. Please post a video of you falling to our knees screaming "NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!"


#33
Sam_Flynn
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 121
0
2
4
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Sam_Flynn
0
2
4
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Your hands are shaking, a dead giveaway that you don't believe your own lies.
Ok dipshit.
Impressive retort. You got me convinced to change my mind with that name calling. *facepalm* 
#34
Sam_Flynn
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 121
0
2
4
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Sam_Flynn
0
2
4
-->
@WyIted
There is no excuse for this misinformation. Anyone can watch trumps speech where he calls for peaceful protest. If you stopped just blindly listening to what CNN told you trump said and instead just listen for yourself you would see he said to go peacefully. Not only did he say to stay peaceful in his speech he tweeted it out to his supporters. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BlXZNL2RoA
DITTO!!!!! 

#35
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,044
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@FLRW
More love for Trump! Mencklien sure knew how to protect his son-of a bitch.
#36
Sam_Flynn
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 121
0
2
4
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Sam_Flynn
0
2
4
-->
@Greyparrot
What's so funny is that the Senate was unable to convict Trump before all the footage came out showing Jan 6 as very likely being a deep state setup as people were waved into the capitol by an undetermined number of Federal provocateurs in the crowd.(see Whitmer plot) Things only got very bad when the DC police were ordered to open fire into the crowd with tear gas, followed by baton beatings. 

The Senators didn't know any of this, and yet, Trump still was not convicted.

BINGO!!! 
#37
Sam_Flynn
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 121
0
2
4
Sam_Flynn's avatar
Sam_Flynn
0
2
4
-->
@Sidewalker
Ummmm, I hate to be the one to break it to you, but Trump lost the 2020 election, 
No, the election was stolen through corrupt means. 

Topic's author
#38
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,132
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
What's so funny is that the Senate was unable to convict Trump before all the footage came out showing Jan 6 as very likely being a deep state setup 
You’re a wack job 

The Senators didn't know any of this, and yet, Trump still was not convicted.
They didn’t convict Trump because they wanted to protect their political prospects with the MAGA MORONS 

Topic's author
#39
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,132
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
No, the election was stolen through corrupt means. 
You’re a wack job too LCpl

Topic's author
#40
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,132
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
They do not have the authority to make such a declaration. None. Especially in light of the FACT that the F.B.I. declared that there was NO evidence to substantiate J6 as a so-called "insurrection." Stop calling J6 an Insurrection.
Here you are repeating the same crap you did before under a different name.

Topic's author
#41
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,132
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
At least you can admit he was acquitted. So, this is a none issue then. 
So he was impeached for insurrection. He was “charged” but then the gutless wonders who are the Republican Party tried to protect their political careers by claiming Trump couldn’t be convicted on a technicality- he was already out of office.

Topic's author
#42
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,132
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Not how it works, buddy
Um, yeah buddy. That was the opinion of a law professor, not me, you jackass.


#43
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,063
3
2
4
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
4
-->
@Sam_Flynn
Ummmm, I hate to be the one to break it to you, but Trump lost the 2020 election, 
No, the election was stolen through corrupt means. 
A unicorn told you that, right?
Topic's author
#44
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,132
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
“Voters and lawyers laid the groundwork for the legal challenge to Trump two years ago, when they filed a lawsuit that resulted in the removal of a county commissioner in New Mexico because of his role in the Jan. 6 attack. The theory gained currency in August with the publication of a draft of a law review article by two conservative law professors, William Baude of the University of Chicago and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. Thomas”

Gerard Magliocca, an Indiana University law professor who served as an expert witness for those challenging Trump’s candidacy, said during testimony in the Colorado case that insurrection as it was understood in the 1860s was “any public use of force or a threat of force by a group of people to hinder the execution of the law.”

“During Reconstruction, ‘engage in insurrection’ was understood broadly to include any voluntary act in furtherance of an insurrection against the Constitution, including words of incitement,” 

“Officials at the time interpreted Section 3 expansively and, even before it was adopted, often considered remote links to insurrection to be disqualifying, he said. Congress in one case declined to seat a representative-elect from Kentucky because he had written a letter-to-the-editor early in the Civil War advocating violence against Union soldiers if they entered his state”

#45
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,044
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10

[IwantRooseveltagain] Is someone who lives all alone since his mother died and has never been with a woman a weirdo? [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422851]
[ADreamOfLiberty] Yea that crosses the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422862]
[IwantRooseveltagain] You are so ridiculous. Saying a woman wanted to be raped is acceptable to you but making fun of an obnoxious loser who is inadequate with women is over the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422866 ]



Topic's author
#46
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,132
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Is someone who lives all alone since his mother died and has never been with a woman a weirdo? 

What if he is unemployed and only works occasionally as a substitute teacher?




#47
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,044
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10

[IwantRooseveltagain] Is someone who lives all alone since his mother died and has never been with a woman a weirdo? [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422851]
[ADreamOfLiberty] Yea that crosses the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422862]
[IwantRooseveltagain] You are so ridiculous. Saying a woman wanted to be raped is acceptable to you but making fun of an obnoxious loser who is inadequate with women is over the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422866 ]



Topic's author
#48
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,132
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Is someone who lives all alone since his mother died and has never been with a woman a weirdo? 

What if he is unemployed and only works occasionally as a substitute teacher?

Topic's author
#49
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,132
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Is someone who lives all alone since his mother died and has never been with a woman a weirdo? 

What if he is unemployed and only works occasionally as a substitute teacher?

#50
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,044
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10

[IwantRooseveltagain] Is someone who lives all alone since his mother died and has never been with a woman a weirdo? [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422851]
[ADreamOfLiberty] Yea that crosses the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422862]
[IwantRooseveltagain] You are so ridiculous. Saying a woman wanted to be raped is acceptable to you but making fun of an obnoxious loser who is inadequate with women is over the line. [https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/10369/posts/422866 ]



Topic's author
#51
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,132
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Is someone who lives all alone since his mother died and has never been with a woman a weirdo? 

What if he is unemployed and only works occasionally as a substitute teacher?

#52
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,063
3
2
4
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
4
-->
@Sam_Flynn
Well genius, Trump couldn’t possibly be President in 2024
He will be. Please post a video of you falling to our knees screaming "NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!"
No, IWRA is correct, it is impossible for Trump to be President in 2024.

As the Twentieth Amendment states, “the terms of the President and Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January … and the terms of their successors shall then begin.”  That would be January 20th, 2025.

Please post a video of you falling to your knees screaming "I'M SUCH A DUMB ASS!!!!!"
#53
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,044
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@Sidewalker
Lol, November is going to be such a hilarious month.
Topic's author
#54
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,132
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
A “state’s legitimate interest in protecting the integrity and practical functioning of the political process permits it to exclude from the ballot candidates who are constitutionally prohibited from assuming office,”  - Appeals Court Judge Neil Gorsuch

Uh oh, Looks like one SCJ has already affirmed that states can block candidates who aren’t qualified under the Constitution 
Topic's author
#55
IwantRooseveltagain
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 6,132
3
3
6
IwantRooseveltagain's avatar
IwantRooseveltagain
3
3
6
Good morning loser!

No work today?
#56
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,152
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain

Maybe GP is a Russian bot.
#57
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,044
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@FLRW
I heard a lot of Russians live in Slovenia. This explains a lot.
#58
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,152
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

OMG, Is GP Melania?
#59
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,044
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
Yo, check it, let me tell you 'bout a lady so fine, Melania Trump, she's one of a kind, From Slovenia to the White House scene, She's got the grace of a beauty queen. Steady with style, elegance for days, Got FLRW simping for her in a million ways, Her poise, her charm, it's hard to ignore, Melania's got FLRW coming back for more.

Simping for Melania, she's the queen of his dreams, In her presence, everything gleams, From her smile to her stride, she's got it all, Simping for Melania, standing tall.

She's got the class, she's got the flair, In her heels and her designer wear, From fashion shows to diplomatic scenes, Melania's got the spotlight, she reigns supreme. Her intellect shines, her languages vast, In any room, she's unsurpassed, With every move, she's got FLRW in awe, Simping for Melania, breaking the law.

Simping for Melania, she's the queen of his dreams, In her presence, everything gleams, From her smile to her stride, she's got it all, Simping for Melania, standing tall.



#60
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,152
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

Trump thinks, and has said, that having pets is “low class.” At one point he expressed disappointment that Pence has pets.