You are probably not LGQBTP+

they just need to date...each other.

I was stunned when the employee recommended I get an LGTV.

The liberation so many straight men will feel when they realize that they don't need to be incels, they don't need to lie about their body counts on message boards, they just need to date...each other.

If you are reading this it is entirely possible that you are not a queer.

The LGBT movement has tried to make the definition cover just about everything so as to make you personally identify with he movement so as to trick you into defending several forms of degeneracy.  

Women who identify as men or gender queer 

If you are a female and you like a lot of masculine things, you like to hang out with the boys and watch football, but you are romantically interested in men, Tham the LGBTQP movement has most likely lied to you and told you that you in fact were gender non conforming or that you are a woman in a male's body but a homosexual male.

I personally have been with so many women that it is disgusting and I probably have a disease...

If you think you are a lesbian, you are a woman with low self confidence. You either think you are too ugly to get a man because you are, so you pretend to be a lesbian because many women are more open to sex with ugly people, though you yourself aren't open to sex with an ugly man. 

The second option is you have low self esteem but it's because people are dicks not because you are ugly. 

it is entirely possible that you are not a queer.

The LGBT movement has tried to make the definition

cover just about everything so as to make you personally identify with he movement so as to trick you into defending several forms of degeneracy.  

Women who identify as men or gender queer 

If you are a female and you like a lot of masculine things, you like to hang out with the boys and watch football, but you are romantically interested in men, Tham the LGBTQP movement has most likely lied to you and told you that you in fact were gender non conforming or that you are a woman in a male's body but a homosexual male.

You aren't.  You are a tomboy and there is nothing wrong with that.

You don't need to identify with their stupid movement and their attempts to confuse you and trick you into cutting off your tits.

He'll I have seen some of you join tiktok, marry a man and have kids with him, but claim to be LGBTQP because you also change the oil in the car and love hunting. You aren't you are a tomboy, stay away from the brain washing.

Bisexual women

You have been told that you are part of the LGBTQP movement because you like men and you are attracted to women. This is untrue. You have been lied to. 

I personally have been with so many women that it is disgusting and I probably have a disease. Every single one with the exception of one, was attracted to other women and open to 3somes or one night stands with other women.

If you are mostly in relationships with men, you are co sidereal heterosexual.

Do not let the  woke mob convince you you are weird or odd or not normal. You are normal.

It is normal for a woman to be in mostly male relationships but enjoy the beauty of a woman. 

Lesbian women

If you are a lesbian woman, I have news for you. No you are not. This is a cope. I have slept with at least 3 women who have claimed to be lesbian. I didn't turn them. They identified that way prior to me fucking them, and yes the sex was consensual. 

If you hink you are a lesbian, you are a woman with low self confidence. You either think you are too ugly to get a man because you are, so you pretend to be a lesbian because many women are more open to sex with ugly people, though you yourself aren't open to sex with an ugly man. 

The second option is you have low self esteem but it's because people are dicks not because you are ugly. You are beautiful, you are heterosexual stop lying to yourself and maybe if you are ugly do lower your standards a bit and find some incel.

Feminine guys who like women

You are not a lesbian or a Trans person. Do not let these sickos talk you into cutting off your penis and joining their cult. If you do want to cut off your penis, just cut off the tip and become a Christian. 

It's okay to like cooking or to be into interior design or whatever the fuck feminine men do. 

Gay men

Okay you really are part of the LGBT

Tomboys are queer, definitively. It's literally a queer status just as drag queen is etc.

If you called drag queens queer to my face we would have an issue. They are entertainers.  This is like calling Mrs doubtfire a queer. 

Fuck off with your bigotry

A lot of incels are getting itinto their heads that it's easier to find love as a woman. So they become trans in order to get laid and finally be in a long lasting and loving relationship. 

I don't know what to suggest in this regard. Thy are probably correct, it is the o ly way they can find love. 

Studies have found a large overlap with autism, so my theory is that autistic people struggle to get laid because they come across as autistic when hitting on women, but if they turn into women the awkwardness is chalked up to being quirky or some other spin. 

It really quite simple with me. If you act like a degenerate perverted weirdo espousing degenerate weirdo shit, its highly unlikely we will be anywhere near each other, in private, public or in the work place. And that's OK with me, I cant be everyone's shot of grain alcohol.

How would I define queer?

It mean weird it just refers to gay people and I refuse to acknowledge the new definitions of the word that have been popularized. You are not queer for being a drag queen or a tomboy or a feminine male like Gordon Ramsey. 

I allowed the word queer to expand to mean gay because it happened before I as born, but I will be damned if I allow the word to be hijacked again.

Dude there is this game the left is playing with the English language where they think by controlling definitions they can control mindset. 

Queer just meant gay male before. People used to refer to gays as "being funny" queer literally means funny (southern for different) . These people were not referring to people who were gender fluid or very fluid in their sexual orientation when they said it.  The left plays this game with language as a stupid trick to attempt to make senior citizens look bigoted. It's a fact. Here I som other examples

Negro- literally the Spanish word for black and clearly just means the same thing as African American. However if I said it on my way to work it would get me attacked on the bus

Oriental- just a way to say Asian many older Asians still refer to themselves as being Orientals.  The left wants to make 75 year old people look racist so thy randomly decide to change the term for whatever reason. 

Racism- hatred of or having a feeling of superiority over other races on the basis of racial qualities.

Now they know that maybe one in a million people are actually racist by that definition. So they have changed the definition to be the following

Racism- white people . Those with a higher social status in society and are white automatically have that status based on their skin color, oh and by the way since only oppressors can be racist any non white person who thinks they are superior to others based on their skin color are not racist. 

It's really a stupid game you guys play and it is recent. Greek words in 500bc meant the exact same thing in 500AD because nobody played those games with language. The left see it as a tool to make senior citizens look racist so they change definitions every 5 years. 

The general population, as well as all major institutions in America, are comprised primarily of white people. As a result, “white supremacy” is a more dangerous concept than “black supremacy.” Black people are still a minority, and they will not experience the same access to power that the white population maintains simply because…there are more white people. So, you’re right that the two are not treated the same, because the threat is not the same. 

Language evolves, it is expected to evolve. But people such as yourself only care when it evolves in regards to marginalized demographics

while a celebration of white culture would be racist, a celebration of Irish-American or Italian-American culture would not be racist….for reasons, I hope, would be obvious.

I'll leave the explanation to the actual linguists