Which implies there are other conditions where you can infringe on the issue of voting, else why make a laundry list? The constitution does not say clearly the right to vote shall not be infringed.
Whatever follows you ignoring your own statements which led to the constitution even being mentioned is irreverent. Red herring.Let's go to #46 where this began:Post 46 is irrelevant to this conversation.
It's not actually Texas requesting the verification... perhaps the issue is to find voters... maybe the real issue is to figure out who is dead who is alive and who can vote; and they're not real registrations.
Let's go to #46 where this began:Post 46 is irrelevant to this conversation.Whatever follows you ignoring your own statements which led to the constitution even being mentioned is irreverent. Red herring.
Let's go to #46 where this began:Post 46 is irrelevant to this conversation. You took the position that the right to own a gun was more fundamental to being a "real American" than the right to vote. A ridiculous position in my view, but one you are entitled to hold and defend. But when challenged to defend it, offered nothing more than holding up the constitution, to which it was then pointed out that doing so is pure hypocrisy so long as you are unwilling to defend every other principal in it - which you are not.Me pointing out that your defense of your position is hypocrisy, is irrelevant to whether my defense of voting rights is valid.The right wing ethos is that none of this matters, which is my point. It's easy when you already have a job, a car and a license. For many people it's not easy despite the fact that we're talking about something that's supposed to be a constitutional right.That something being voting for POTUS.You claimed that any impedance of proof, fee, or paperwork is violating that right.No, I didn't. I argued that any *unnecessary* impedement to voting was a *practical* violation (ergo the specific phrase I used - "practical disenfranchisement"). There will always be costs on some level associated with voting, my point from the start has always been about the balance between maximizing civic participation and minimizing fraud. Meanwhile your position which you've expressed multiple times is that the former is simply not a value and the latter is all that matters. That is where our disagreement has been.
8 days later
9 days later
9 days later
93 days later
28 days later
20 days later
Ah he's pushing the edge on youtube.Rejection Rates of signature verification allegedly dropped in 2020. That coupled with a late vote tally means what?
Deleting dropbox surveillance footage while there is a pending FOIA request for it is an assault on transparency. This breach of trust is exactly what reduces confidence in our elections. We will hold Detroit accountable, as this secrecy has no place in a fair and secure Election. -RNC Chairman Michael Whatley
The investigation involves around 2,500 voter registration applications dropped off last week at two separate times, shortly before Pennsylvania's voter registration deadline.
Adams said of the applications that have been examined, 60% were fraudulent. She said the remainder should be examined by the end of Friday.
