Is gravity a hoax?

Author: Mall

Posts

Total: 19
Mall
Mall's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 1,279
3
4
4
Mall's avatar
Mall
3
4
4
Is gravity a theory or fact?

Was the moon landing a hoax?

Was Area 51, Roswell, the alien autopsy that was hosted by Mr. Frakes a hoax?
Best.Korea
Best.Korea's avatar
Debates: 281
Posts: 8,673
4
6
10
Best.Korea's avatar
Best.Korea
4
6
10
Everything is fake except Trump.
Owen_T
Owen_T's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 35
0
1
8
Owen_T's avatar
Owen_T
0
1
8
Gravity is created by the government. They made it so we couldn't fly away to escape their regimes. Notice how it only works on earth? Suspicious.

Yes, the moon landing was a hoax. They would have had to use gravity to land. As you know, gravity only exists on earth. Therefore, we know that the moon landing was all staged. It's simple logic.
JoeBob
JoeBob's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,091
3
3
7
JoeBob's avatar
JoeBob
3
3
7
-->
@Mall
well that one guy in infinity war doesn’t act like gravity exists, so you never know
JoeBob
JoeBob's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 1,091
3
3
7
JoeBob's avatar
JoeBob
3
3
7
-->
@Mall
Was the moon landing a hoax?
Yea, just like birds are government spies.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,586
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Mall
Gravity is a word applied to an apparent force.

The "Moon Landing" could potentially have been a hoax response relative to Cold War politics.

And the "Roswell incident" is unlikely to be true....But there again.
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,189
3
2
4
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
4
"Gravity" is only a theory and it isa theory that is obviously flawed, we have mathematical formulas that work, butthey are descriptive rather than explanatory, to this day scientists admit thatthe so-called force of gravity cannot be explained. Our prevailing theory ofgravity is Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, and it can’t bemathematically reconciled with Quantum Theory; it is clearly a theory incrisis.

A rival theory, “Intelligent Falling” makesmore sense, the simple fact is, things do not fall because of a mysterious andunexplained gravitational force, they fall because a higher intelligence ispushing them down. Atheist Gravitationists have been pushing the gravity agendafar too long, it is time we accept the theory of Intelligent Falling.

Please understand,  I’m not saying that Gravityshould not be taught in the science classroom, only that our students shouldalso be taught the theory of Intelligent Falling so they can make an informeddecision for themselves.
cristo71
cristo71's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,265
3
2
3
cristo71's avatar
cristo71
3
2
3
Why does everyone think we only had one moon landing?
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 23,761
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@cristo71
@Sidewalker

"Let's take a look at the evidence," said ECFR senior fellow Gregory Lunsden."In Matthew 15:14, Jesus says, 'And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.' He says nothing about some gravity making them fall—just that they will fall. Then, in Job 5:7, we read, 'But mankind is born to trouble, as surely as sparks fly upwards.' If gravity is pulling everything down, why do the sparks fly upwards with great surety? This clearly indicates that a conscious intelligence governs all falling."
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 3,255
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@Greyparrot
Ah 2005 onion, still funny at then. Now we just have Babylon Bee and people's cube.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,472
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

What's the main reason people are getting stupider?
Could it be Trump Gravity?
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 14,202
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Sidewalker
"Gravity" is only a theory and it isa theory that is obviously flawed, we have mathematical formulas that work, butthey are descriptive rather than explanatory, to this day scientists admit thatthe so-called force of gravity cannot be explained. Our prevailing theory ofgravity is Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, and it can’t bemathematically reconciled with Quantum Theory; it is clearly a theory incrisis.

A rival theory, “Intelligent Falling” makesmore sense, the simple fact is, things do not fall because of a mysterious andunexplained gravitational force, they fall because a higher intelligence ispushing them down. Atheist Gravitationists have been pushing the gravity agendafar too long, it is time we accept the theory of Intelligent Falling.

Please understand,  I’m not saying that Gravityshould not be taught in the science classroom, only that our students shouldalso be taught the theory of Intelligent Falling so they can make an informeddecision for themselves.
well stated
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,586
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Sidewalker
Yep, theistic Anti-Gravitationists teaching kids even more flawed theoretical religious tosh.


As I stated, gravity is simply a name given to an apparent force of nature.

Which for sure might be a super-intelligence.

If so, we can call it GRAVITY.
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,189
3
2
4
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
4
-->
@zedvictor4
Gravity is a vast conspiracy.

Is it just a coincidence that Gravity, Grave, Gravel, and Gravy all start with the same four letters, of course not.

But that's what they want us to think.

And what about Gravitas, there is no way that's just a coincidence.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,416
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
..." Heavy objects like stars and planets distorted spacetime in a way that made objects move toward them, so gravity is simply a result of the geometry of spacetime. As bizarre as this sounds, it has been validated over and over again. "...

As Ive clearly pointed out to many others --to which Ive never get logical, common sense critical thinking response accept those who claim ' aether '---  spacetime has to be an occupied space medium to become/distorted/warped/bent/twisted et,c and to date ---20 years later--- none, accept my self, have offered explanation for defining what this spacetime or space-time or space and time medium is that can be bent/warped/distorted.

1} Occupied space has two primary, geodesically/curvature based fields that share a common quantum particle, the graviton-darkEon   --ergo Gravity and Dark Energy connected---  on my logical, common sense critical thinking pathways of thought. I believe Eric Verlinde arrives at similar conclusion, tho from very differrent pathways,

.....1a} this two fields of Gravity { non-quantized } and Dark Energy { non-quantised } have resultant third set of 2ndary fields of physical reality { quantized }.  This is where Eric Verlinde and I arrive at different conclusions, as he believes Gravity and Dark Energy are emergent from physical reality. I the other way around. 

...1b}  ergo when ever people here phrase ' space ' is warped, they should understand that,

.........1c} the medium of space is an occupied space specifically labeled as Gravity { contractive aka mass-attracitive } and Dark Energy { expansive ergo Einsteins ' cosmological constant ' that he later discarded afer initial adding to his original formula },

I make no apologizes for being the only person ---accept for the ' aetherist ' peoples or the Gravity is a pushing force---   who attempts to use logical, common sense critical thinking in regards to what this distorted/wapred/bent ' space ' is in regards to be a specific medium of occupied space, of which, can be distorted.

Any truly non-occupied space is not an occupied space medium, ergo, cannot be distorted/warped/bent/ twisted etc as we've seen written for many years now by many seemingly educated physicists and cosmologist etc.

....space(> * <)(> * <)space.... is the only logical, common sense critical thinking conlusion

* * = physical reality that is  sine-wave { ^v^v field ^v^v  } associated resultant from invaginations > <  from the peak of geodesic curvature of the cojoined{ two sides of the same torus }

(  )   = Gravity (  ) as outer surface set of nodal events, and,

)( =  Dark Energy as the inner surface set of nodal events,

> < = the invagination, ---to whatever degree-- that rapidly return back out to the respective geodesic surface field pathways.

None have a more logical, common sense critical thinking in regards to definning what is meant by 'distorted spacetime ' or ' warped space ',  or ' bends space ' or warps spacetime ' so on and so on non-definitions of what the spacetime is what the space is what the time is that can literraly be be bent/warped/distorted.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,472
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@ebuc

Well stated.
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,472
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Mall

Gravitational Force = (Gravitational Constant × Mass of first object × Mass of the second object) / (Distance between the center of two bodies)2.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,586
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@Sidewalker
Who are they?
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,416
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@zedvictor4
Who are they?
They have gone off on conspiracy fiction, because of the following, that, Ive been asking Sidewalker various times around here   ---and many others over the years---.

I think SW is loosing it since he cannot explain what is truly meant when he, I and most others have  read all of our  lives,  that, this ' space ' and  ' time ' or  ' space-time ' or ' spacetime ' is warped/bent/curved etc by a mass { ex Sol ,} ergo, the photon passing by  follows as geodesic path of a curved ' space '. 

Uh professor, please explain what specifically this curved space and/or time  is,  in regards to being an  occupied space something, ---ex a medium like a metal spoon, or wood, or plastic, etc---, that can humans can see being curved? 

An untreated piece 2x4 lumber left on ground over nigh absorbs moisture and be caused it to twist/curve by next morning?

.......space(> * <)(> * <)space......

* * = represents physical reality

(  ) - represents geodesic, positive curvature of Gravitaitonal { contractive/attractive } field

)( = represents geodesic, negative curvature of Dark Energy { expansive/divergent } field

space = representative of eternally existent and truly macro-infinite non-occupied space, existent outside of the eternally existent, finite, occupied space Universe

A} science is instrumental confirmational judge of the empirical facts,

B} scientist are the judge of the scenarios around these observed facts,

C} general public is judge of truth regarding what is presented to them as facts from as observed by the scientist.