-->
@sadolite
My point proved. My work is done here.
You ended it without making any friends. Most unrewarding ending.
Your philosophy
Posts
Total:
48
-->
@Shila
If your purpose is the pursuit of my truth, there is no such thing as losing. There is only growth.
-->
@FLRW
If your purpose is the pursuit of my truth, there is no such thing as losing. There is only growth.
Is that why your nipples look swollen?
-->
@ebuc
I totally agree!
-->
@MAV99
I totally agree!
Does he have swollen nipples as well?
-->
@MAV99
I totally agree!
Ok so that is five in agreement. If my accounting is correct interpretations of comments made are correct.
H,mm I wonder if DArt uses popular vote or electoral vote system. Kidding. I know there is no voting system at DArt.
Seems I do recall seeing some kind of a polling system around some time back. If DArt is going under soon, all is of less and less significance to some, and still signifcant to others. Significant enough buy DArt from the owner? Sorry, I dont think I can be of much help with the financial issue.
-->
@Best.Korea
Is that true?No. Nothing is true, not even this
Too bad. Just when we are getting used to it.
7 days later
-->
@Shila
Why don't you show everyone on this sight you have at least are not trolling and give a definition (or description if you cant quite put it in a definition) of the list I gave at the beginning of this thread, which is what this thread is for.
Why don't you show everyone on this sight you have at least are not trolling and give a definition (or description if you cant quite put it in a definition) of the list I gave at the beginning of this thread, which is what this thread is for.
See my case for the historical Jesus.
-->
@Shila
Do you have definitions of the the list I gave at the beginning of this thread?
-->
@MAV99
Do you have definitions of the the list I gave at the beginning of this thread?
You have already define the words in your list. They are reasonable definitions.
-->
@MAV99
I had definitions, but you ignored me.
Are you scared of me.
-->
@zedvictor4
I had definitions, but you ignored me.Are you scared of me.
It’s your philosophy that he is scared about.
-->
@zedvictor4
I read your definitions.
This thread was for those on this sight to give their definitions of these common philosophical terms.
I did not ignore them. I read them. They help me when reading your debates to understand what you are saying.
We could discuss them if you wished as I see more than enough in them to discuss, but I will leave that up to you.
-->
@zedvictor4
I had definitions, but you ignored me.Are you scared of me.
I brought forward your post which had the definitions.
Definitively, one might suggest that an affect might also be a cause...Especially as a part of a sequence of events.
Principle: Key data relative to an understanding, or to an hypothesis.
Knowledge: Recorded and retrievable data.
Will: The ability to make decisions within the context of the thinking unit. (Cause and effect, rather than randomness).
Being: Relative to knowledge...The principle of the assumed status of the self and others.
Real: Relative to knowledge...The assumption that sensory input is accurate.
Reality: See above.
Truth: See above.
Goodness: An indefinite principle.
True: Understood to be accurate. (Within the context of the thinking device or devices)
Good: Conforming with the indefinite principle of goodness.
Beauty: An assumption relative to conditioned expectation.
Evil: Another assumption relative to conditioned expectation.
Nature: Everything.
-->
@MAV99
Is there anything listed that you take issue with?
-->
@zedvictor4
Definitely your definition of nature.
Other ones like beauty and evil are not really a definition.
Your definition of goodness does not seem to explain what it is.
The other ones all give me the impression you think reality is a computer which is highly debatable.
-->
@zedvictor4
Is there anything listed that you take issue with?
He mentioned a few.
Nature, beauty, evil and goodness.