Debate Voting Thread (FORMER)
Posts
Archived
Read-only
Total:
240
-->
@DebateArt.com
I thought I had given conduct to Con and Pro arguments but I clicked the same thing for Con as I had done to Pro which ended up in a mistake I am sorry. https://www.debateart.com/debates/33?open_tab=votes&votes_page=1
-->
@Earth
@David
@Imabench
@bsh1
@the_bat_man
I can only tag five people. If you're tagged, you're a reliable voter who I hope will really take a listen to all the songs and observe my Round 2 before voting.
It's not over but I am notfying you early so you have time to hear the songs before it hits voting period.
Truly vote for who puts out the songs you both admire and are pleased by the most. I urge you to read my Round 2 before voting if you are intending on judging purely on lyrical content.
Virtuoso, in your music battle the songs were all so different that I couldn't really pick a winner. I know that to me even though he forfeited a round, type1 had more my style but I wasn't even sure to give all seven points or just three.
In this debate please only vote three points for arguments as we are also arguing about our taste not just putting songs up.
-->
@Buddamoose
@David
@bsh1
@Tejretics
@DieserDeutscheTyp
US voters should have to pass a citizenship test in order to be able to vote, but only for Senate and Presidential candidates
Prop: Imabench
Con: RationalMadman
Depth: 10/10
You will enjoy this if you like deep debates about issues that are both moral, legal and pragmatic.
-->
@RationalMadman
10/10 debate, been a while since ive had a good and memorable one like that, regardless of how voting turns out
-->
@Earth
@David
@Dsjpk5
@the_bat_man
-->
@David
@Dsjpk5
@the_bat_man
Three extremely easy votes, full forfeit as in 0 content from Type1 at all and autowin methods from me or proper argumentation:
-->
@DebateArt.com
@Earth
LOOK AT EARTH'S REASONING LOOK AT IT! He PURELY FOCUSES ON ONE TINY ANGLE and ignores the entire R2 where I explain how the quiz filters out the exact people Bench wants to vote and enables those who are informed and against what he deems necessary to believe in to vote. On top of that I decimate his entire BoP by cutting all supporting pillars of his case to shreds from the flat earthers to the notion that democracy rests upon voters forcibly needing to inform themselves.
-->
@RationalMadman
Wow, not 5 minutes later and you are at my throat. Do you want me to write a 5 page thesis why I voted the way I did?
I see nothing wrong with Earth’s vote
-->
@David
Should I tell you what's wrong with it?
-->
@RationalMadman
Go ahead.
-->
@Earth
in round 2 (round 3 in the debate as round 1 was a non-round) I ripped apart everything you said I failed to.
-->
@RationalMadman
Like what? And what about the rest of debate?
-->
@Earth
I can tell you on pm that i objectively won the debate from all angles
-->
@RationalMadman
How about you tell me here.
-->
@Earth
Is it allowed to do in public
-->
@RationalMadman
Meh, not sure. Lets move it to a Misc thread or some shit.
-->
@Earth
@RationalMadman
Please do not debate this in this thread. I don't want this thread to become a flame war over why a vote was good or bad.
-->
@David
@blamonkey
@the_bat_man
I am Opp and basically tear apart Prop at the seams via BoP analysis and mitigation. Easy vote.
-->
@DebateArt.com
@David
@Imabench
@the_bat_man
@Avikarthos
Ill pass, I only try to vote on good debates