Mall's video debate summary - Did Jesus invent Christianity? Can you be holy and sin?

Author: TheGreatSunGod

Posts

Total: 51
Tradesecret
Tradesecret's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 3,505
3
2
6
Tradesecret's avatar
Tradesecret
3
2
6
-->
@Clausewitzian
  • Jesus was a Jew who lived fully under the Jewish covenant (the Law of Moses) and never claimed to start a new religion.
  • I think that's fair. Although it is also true that he wasn't particularly happy with the way the then current leaders were taking the Jewish religion. 

  • He affirmed the Law, spoke about fulfilling it (not abolishing it), and constantly referred back to God’s covenant with Israel.
  • Again, true, although the question of "fulfilling it" is subject to debate and the exact meaning of it. 

  • Nowhere in the Gospels does Jesus say, “Start a new faith called Christianity.”
  • Again, true, although he does mention the Church in Matthew 18.  And he does give the Great Commission in Matthew 28, which calls for his disciples to baptise and make disciples from all nations. 

  • The label "Christian" and the organized system we now call "Christianity" developed later, largely shaped by Paul (formerly Saul).
  • Actually, the lable Christian was first used by opponents of the Church, who were first called The Way. This lable was in the first place a negative term. Christians however found honour in this rather than shame.  The organisation of the Church is actually very close (even the worship services) very close to the syngogue of the then Jews.  Paul did have an impact - but he received his understanding directly from Jesus - according to his testimony. 

  • Paul’s letters introduce a major shift: he focuses on faith in Christ over works of the Law, opens up salvation to Gentiles, and lays the foundation for what becomes a separate faith.
  • Again this is debatable. Jesus very often in the Gospels - talks about the faith of those who came to him. And how it helped in their healing or their miracles.  Also there is a serious debate about the direction of the purpose of the Law in the OT.  Abraham initially started the move towards Gentiles - father of the nations. Not just one nation. the introduction of people into the Jewish covenant, like Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba, all demonstrate that the Jewish faith was by covenant - not by blood initially. 

  • Also you seem to miss the fact that in AD 70 the NT Jewish world died. When the Temple was destroyed the heart and soul of the Jewish religion stopped. Two new cults sprung up. One called the Christians, and one by the Pharisees. Neither practiced OT covenant law literally. The Christians at least practiced it in a spiritual manner. The New Jews, started something completely different. 

  • In doing this, Paulian Christianity starts to deviate from the historical Jesus, who lived, taught, and died as a faithful Jew.
  • Again, very much disputed. Paul followed Christ. He didn't deviate. He took Christ's teachings and extended them naturally.  The fact that Jesus healed and talked to and witnessed to the Gentiles is not in dispute.  The Gospels present that very well - as does his final commission before he went to heaven. Disciple the nations. 

  • Over time, Paul's interpretation overshadowed the original Jewish context of Jesus’ life and teachings.
  • Paul and Jesus' teachings are consistent. Jesus of course is the one we worship. 

  • Thus, modern Christianity is more Pauline than it is directly from Jesus himself.            
  • Not true. 

    Christians follow a man, named Saul of Tarsus, who was a jew, but who abandoned the faith, and opened up early Christianity (A sect of Judaism) into a wholly different faith, Christianity. 

    Christians follow Christ Jesus. Paul is important but insignificant next to Christ. 

    I suspect, Saul felt the sect would die if more weren't allowed to join. Therefor he got rid of circumcision, sabbath, kosher, and many other things required of jews, to make the faith appear more welcoming to Gentiles, and it worked. Gentiles joined fast, and the faith spread steadily. 

    Interesting suspicion but debunked on many levels. 

    I notice you have read lots of Austrian Economic books - You have named many of my favourite authors - have you read anything by Gary North - also Peter Bauer, - North has many commentaries and ideas which expose the weakness of your arguments. 

    Still welcome to this Debate Site. 
    Shila
    Shila's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 7,384
    3
    3
    5
    Shila's avatar
    Shila
    3
    3
    5
    -->
    @Clausewitzian
    I suspect, Saul felt the sect would die if more weren't allowed to join. Therefor he got rid of circumcision, sabbath, kosher, and many other things required of jews, to make the faith appear more welcoming to Gentiles, and it worked. Gentiles joined fast, and the faith spread steadily. 
    Even though Paul should be credited for the spread of Christianity. He based it on the life and teachings of Jesus giving credit entirely to Jesus.
    Clausewitzian
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 10
    0
    0
    6
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Clausewitzian
    0
    0
    6
    -->
    @Tradesecret
    Jews of the time, including the apostles, were still Torah-observant — but the label's very appearance marks a public perception of a different movement.
    "The organization of the Church is actually very close (even the worship services) to the synagogue of the then Jews. Paul did have an impact — but he received his understanding directly from Jesus — according to his testimony."
    Paul explicitly rejected Mosaic markers like circumcision and kosher (Galatians 5:2-6, Romans 14).
    His "testimony" (e.g., Galatians 1:11-12) is his own claim, not independent verification.
    In reality, Paul's theology moves radically away from Jewish covenantal identity towards faith-alone universalism, which Jesus himself never taught explicitly.

    "Jesus very often in the Gospels talks about the faith of those who came to him. And how it helped in their healing or miracles. Also, there is a serious debate about the direction of the purpose of the Law in the OT."
    Jesus’ discussions of faith do not suggest faith replacing Torah observance.
    Gentile examples (Rahab, Ruth) were exceptions, not norms — and even they converted into Israel, accepting Torah obligations.
    According to Christian scripture we see that he healed Gentiles rarely and made it clear (Matthew 15:24):
    "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel."
    When the Temple was destroyed the heart and soul of the Jewish religion stopped. Two new cults sprung up. One called the Christians, and one by the Pharisees.
    Wrong framing.
    Rabbinic Judaism developed as the legitimate continuation of Second Temple practices post-destruction — preserving covenantal loyalty without the Temple.
    "Christianity" was already diverging under Paul decades before 70 AD.
    The Temple's destruction accelerated but did not cause the split — Paul’s own letters show the theological divergence happening in the 40s and 50s AD
    In doing this, Paulian Christianity starts to deviate from the historical Jesus, who lived, taught, and died as a faithful Jew.
    Again, very much disputed. Paul followed Christ. He didn't deviate.
    Absolutely incorrect:
    Paul deviates sharply by abandoning key Jewish practices:
    Circumcision (Galatians 5:2)
    Kosher (Romans 14)
    Sabbath (Colossians 2:16-17)
    Jesus never did this. Paul’s Jesus is a cosmic, preexistent Logos (Philippians 2:6-11), whereas the historical Jesus spoke as a prophet within Judaism.
    Paul is building a theological system that extends beyond Jesus’ explicit teachings.

    Paul and Jesus' teachings are consistent. Jesus of course is the one we worship.
    Jesus taught Torah observance until heaven and earth pass away (Matthew 5:18).
    Paul taught freedom from the Law (Roman 7:6)

    Christians follow Christ Jesus. Paul is important but insignificant next to Christ.
    Jesus preached primarily to Jews, about Israel, about repentance, and about the coming Kingdom — not about a Gentile universal church.
    Major Christian doctrines — grace alone, faith alone, salvation apart from works of the Law — are Pauline formulations.
    While Christ is the object of worship, Paul is the architect of Christian theology.
    Without Paul's letters, there would be no:
    Soteriology (salvation theology)Ecclesiology (church organization)
    Christology (preexistent Christ)
    Paul is far from "insignificant" — he defines how Christians interpret Christ.

    Interesting suspicion but debunked on many levels.

    Acts 15 (Jerusalem Council) records Paul arguing against circumcision for Gentiles.
    Paul removed kosher obligations (Romans 14), Sabbath requirements (Colossians 2:16), and deliberately made Christianity accessible to Gentiles by discarding Jewish boundary markers.
    It worked: Gentiles flooded in, and the Jewish identity of the movement vanished within a generation.

    As for the authors you referenced, I can't say I have read them, what can you recommend, and if you would be so kind as to provide a quick description of your top picks I'd be grateful. 


    Clausewitzian
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 10
    0
    0
    6
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Clausewitzian
    0
    0
    6
    -->
    @Shila
    I disagree for a few reasons. 

    First of all, Jesus' ministry was Jewish-Covenantal. Jesus lived, worked, and died within the framework of Jewish Law. He repeatedly instructs torah observance, and sent his disciples only to jews ( Matthew 10:5-6)
    Paul preached salvation by faith alone, without works of the Law (Romans 3:28).
    He taught that circumcision, kosher laws, and Sabbath observance were non-essential or even obsolete for Gentile believers (Galatians 5, Colossians 2)
    Jesus rarely spoke about his death as an atoning sacrifice in a systematic theological way.
    Paul builds an entire doctrinal structure around the cross as the centerpiece of salvation (1 Corinthians 1:18, Romans 5).
    Concepts like "original sin" (Romans 5:12-19) and "justification by faith" are Pauline constructions, not explicit teachings of Jesus.

    Shila
    Shila's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 7,384
    3
    3
    5
    Shila's avatar
    Shila
    3
    3
    5
    -->
    @Clausewitzian
    Acts 15 (Jerusalem Council) records Paul arguing against circumcision for Gentiles.
    Paul removed kosher obligations (Romans 14), Sabbath requirements (Colossians 2:16), and deliberately made Christianity accessible to Gentiles by discarding Jewish boundary markers.
    It worked: Gentiles flooded in, and the Jewish identity of the movement vanished within a generation.
    True Christianity identified with non kosher and freedom from circumcision. But Islam embraces food restrictions and circumcision and Muslims will soon out number Christians

    Clausewitzian
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 10
    0
    0
    6
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Clausewitzian
    0
    0
    6
    -->
    @Shila
    What is your point? Halel is not the same as Kosher, it is similar, but not the same. As for Muslims outnumbering Christians, again what is your point? 
    That Muslims conceive more than Christians? 

    The number attributed to Muslims is much lower in reality, the same can be said of Christendom. Many Muslims are only muslim because its culturally damaging to leave the faith, and at least in some countries, outright illegal. Islam is also not spreading via conversion nearly as much as it is via birth. More people probably leave Islam than convert those who convert to it. 
    Shila
    Shila's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 7,384
    3
    3
    5
    Shila's avatar
    Shila
    3
    3
    5
    -->
    @Clausewitzian
    Christians follow a man, named Saul of Tarsus, who was a jew, but who abandoned the faith, and opened up early Christianity (A sect of Judaism) into a wholly different faith, Christianity.

    I suspect, Saul felt the sect would die if more weren't allowed to join. Therefor he got rid of circumcision, sabbath, kosher, and many other things required of jews, to make the faith appear more welcoming to Gentiles, and it worked. Gentiles joined fast, and the faith spread steadily.
    There would be no Christianity without Jesus.

    Yes, Christianity is founded on the life and teachings of Jesus Christ. While he was a Jewish preacher and teacher, his followers proclaimed him as the incarnation of God and the Messiah, and their belief in his resurrection was the foundation for the Christian faith.
    Here's a more detailed explanation:
    Jesus's ministry:
    Jesus's ministry involved preaching the coming of the Kingdom of God and teaching a message of love and compassion.
    The concept of Messiah:
    After his crucifixion, Jesus's followers believed he had risen from the dead and was the Messiah prophesied in Jewish scriptures.
    Early Christian community:
    This belief led to the emergence of a community of followers who considered Jesus to be the Son of God and the founder of their new faith.
    The evolution of Christianity:
    Over time, this early Christian community developed into a more structured religion, with its own beliefs, practices, and traditions

    Clausewitzian
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 10
    0
    0
    6
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Clausewitzian
    0
    0
    6
    -->
    @Shila
    While it's true that Christianity would not exist without Jesus as the central figure, it is historically inaccurate to claim that Christianity is simply the direct continuation of Jesus' ministry. Jesus lived, taught, and died as a Torah-observant Jew, preaching exclusively to the lost sheep of Israel, not to Gentiles, and upholding the Law without abolishing it. His early followers, including Peter and James, continued to observe Jewish law even after believing in his resurrection. The actual transformation of Jesus’ Jewish movement into a new, Law-free, Gentile-inclusive faith was the work of Paul. Paul abolished circumcision, kosher laws, Sabbath observance, and other covenantal requirements — changes Jesus himself never taught — and reinterpreted Jesus’ death and resurrection into a universal theology based on faith alone. Thus, while Jesus inspired the faith, Christianity as a distinct, organized religion is fundamentally the product of Paul's radical theological innovations, not a simple unfolding of Jesus' original mission.
    Shila
    Shila's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 7,384
    3
    3
    5
    Shila's avatar
    Shila
    3
    3
    5
    -->
    @Clausewitzian
    While it's true that Christianity would not exist without Jesus as the central figure, it is historically inaccurate to claim that Christianity is simply the direct continuation of Jesus' ministry. Jesus lived, taught, and died as a Torah-observant Jew, preaching exclusively to the lost sheep of Israel, not to Gentiles, and upholding the Law without abolishing it. His early followers, including Peter and James, continued to observe Jewish law even after believing in his resurrection. The actual transformation of Jesus’ Jewish movement into a new, Law-free, Gentile-inclusive faith was the work of Paul. Paul abolished circumcision, kosher laws, Sabbath observance, and other covenantal requirements — changes Jesus himself never taught — and reinterpreted Jesus’ death and resurrection into a universal theology based on faith alone. Thus, while Jesus inspired the faith, Christianity as a distinct, organized religion is fundamentally the product of Paul's radical theological innovations, not a simple unfolding of Jesus' original mission.
    Jesus commanded his disciples to take his message to the world.

    Mark 16:15 He said to them, “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to all creation..


    Clausewitzian
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 10
    0
    0
    6
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Clausewitzian
    0
    0
    6
    -->
    @Shila
    While Mark 16:15 does say, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to all creation," this passage must be read in context.
    First, most scholars agree that Mark 16:9–20 — including that verse — was a later addition, not part of the earliest manuscripts of Mark.
    Second, even taking it at face value, "gospel" (euangelion) at that point referred to the announcement of the Kingdom of God, not yet to a Law-free, Gentile-inclusive religion.
    Jesus' earthly ministry consistently prioritized the House of Israel (Matthew 15:24) and affirmed Torah observance (Matthew 5:17-19).
    The universal, Law-free Christianity we know today only emerged after Paul systematically abolished Jewish covenant requirements for Gentiles (Galatians 5, Romans 14).
    Thus, even if Jesus sent his disciples to the nations, it was still a Jewish message, not a charter to discard the Law and found a new, separate religion — that innovation came later, primarily through Paul's teachings.

    Shila
    Shila's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 7,384
    3
    3
    5
    Shila's avatar
    Shila
    3
    3
    5
    -->
    @Clausewitzian
    While Mark 16:15 does say, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to all creation," this passage must be read in context.
    First, most scholars agree that Mark 16:9–20 — including that verse — was a later addition, not part of the earliest manuscripts of Mark.
    Second, even taking it at face value, "gospel" (euangelion) at that point referred to the announcement of the Kingdom of God, not yet to a Law-free, Gentile-inclusive religion.
    Jesus' earthly ministry consistently prioritized the House of Israel (Matthew 15:24) and affirmed Torah observance (Matthew 5:17-19).
    The universal, Law-free Christianity we know today only emerged after Paul systematically abolished Jewish covenant requirements for Gentiles (Galatians 5, Romans 14).
    Thus, even if Jesus sent his disciples to the nations, it was still a Jewish message, not a charter to discard the Law and found a new, separate religion — that innovation came later, primarily through Paul's teachings.


    While the idea of Jesus' divinity developed gradually within early Christianity, the Apostle Paul significantly shaped the understanding of Jesus as the Son of God and Lord, even though he did not explicitly state that Jesus was God himself. Paul's writings emphasize Jesus' role as the divine mediator, through whom God reconciled the world to himself.

    Yes, the Apostle Paul's writings indicate he considered Jesus to be God. Paul uses titles and descriptions typically reserved for God, applying them to Jesus, and he also uses the title "Lord" in a way that suggests Jesus is understood as YHWH, the God of the Old Testament. Furthermore, Paul's letters suggest that the churches he established also viewed Jesus as God.


    Clausewitzian
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 10
    0
    0
    6
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Clausewitzian
    0
    0
    6
    -->
    @Shila
    While it’s true that Paul elevated Jesus far beyond a typical messianic role, the claim that Paul outright considered Jesus to be God in the same sense as YHWH is an overstatement — and reflects later Christian theology projected backward. Paul never directly calls Jesus "God" in the way later creeds do. In fact, Paul repeatedly distinguishes between God the Father and Jesus the Lord, showing a hierarchy:
    • 1 Corinthians 8:6:
    “Yet for us there is one God, the Father… and one Lord, Jesus Christ…”
    — Here, God is the Father, and Jesus is the Lord (not the same being).
    • Romans 1:4:
    “[Jesus] was declared to be the Son of God with power according to the spirit of holiness by resurrection…”
    — Paul does not say Jesus was God incarnate; rather, he was appointed Son of God through resurrection.
    • 2 Corinthians 5:19:
    “God was reconciling the world through Christ.”
    — Not as Christ — through him — implying a mediator, not co-identity.
    Even when Paul calls Jesus "Lord" (kyrios), that term had a range of meanings, from "master" to a divine agent — not necessarily a one-to-one identification with YHWH. Yes, some early Christians may have begun to interpret "Lord" in more exalted ways, but this is part of the gradual evolution of high Christology — not settled doctrine in Paul’s time.
    So while Paul gave Jesus a cosmic role and viewed him as essential to God’s redemptive plan, the idea that Paul taught Jesus = YHWH in the later Trinitarian sense is anachronistic. That doctrine fully developed much later, particularly in the 4th century at Nicaea and Constantinople.

    Shila
    Shila's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 7,384
    3
    3
    5
    Shila's avatar
    Shila
    3
    3
    5
    -->
    @Clausewitzian
    Even when Paul calls Jesus "Lord" (kyrios), that term had a range of meanings, from "master" to a divine agent — not necessarily a one-to-one identification with YHWH. Yes, some early Christians may have begun to interpret "Lord" in more exalted ways, but this is part of the gradual evolution of high Christology — not settled doctrine in Paul’s time.
    So while Paul gave Jesus a cosmic role and viewed him as essential to God’s redemptive plan, the idea that Paul taught Jesus = YHWH in the later Trinitarian sense is anachronistic. That doctrine fully developed much later, particularly in the 4th century at Nicaea and Constantinople.
    Yes, the apostle Paul believed Jesus to be God. He referred to Jesus as "Lord," which in the New Testament context, implied that Jesus shared in the divinity of the God of Israel. Paul's writings also contain passages that clearly identify Jesus as God, such as in Romans 9:5 and Colossians 1:15-20, where he speaks of Jesus as the "image of the invisible God" and the one through whom all things were created, according to The Bible Project.

    Clausewitzian
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 10
    0
    0
    6
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Clausewitzian
    0
    0
    6
    -->
    @Shila
    Paul never clearly identifies Jesus as God in the same sense as YHWH. He distinguishes “God the Father” from “the Lord Jesus” (1 Cor. 8:6), and verses like Romans 9:5 and Colossians 1:15 use exalted language, but they reflect divine agency — not co-identity with God.
    Shila
    Shila's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 7,384
    3
    3
    5
    Shila's avatar
    Shila
    3
    3
    5
    -->
    @Clausewitzian
    Paul never clearly identifies Jesus as God in the same sense as YHWH. He distinguishes “God the Father” from “the Lord Jesus” (1 Cor. 8:6), and verses like Romans 9:5 and Colossians 1:15 use exalted language, but they reflect divine agency — not co-identity with God.

    If Paul spread Christianity. And Christianity believes Jesus is God. Then we know how Jesus became God.
    Is Jesus God? [Questioning faith #9] – Thinking PacifismIn Christianity, Jesus is widely believed to be God incarnate, the second person of the Holy Trinity, and the Son of God. Christians believe Jesus is both fully human and fully divine, offering salvation and atonement for sin through his crucifixion and resurrection.


    Clausewitzian
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 10
    0
    0
    6
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Clausewitzian
    0
    0
    6
    -->
    @Shila
    As you certainly know, the Holy Trinity as a theory came much later, indeed centuries after Jesus was said to have lived. Additionally, when we consider, Paul, and Christianity being the belief that Jesus is God, we can see that the latter became doctrine, also after Jesus' death, much later, and was likely a principle elevated by Paul. 
    AdaptableRatman
    AdaptableRatman's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 157
    1
    3
    5
    AdaptableRatman's avatar
    AdaptableRatman
    1
    3
    5
    -->
    @TheGreatSunGod
    Did you make this thread to ragebait or to learn?

    If learn, I will teach you. To prove you want to learn, rewrite it all without AI.
    TheGreatSunGod
    TheGreatSunGod's avatar
    Debates: 4
    Posts: 720
    3
    4
    5
    TheGreatSunGod's avatar
    TheGreatSunGod
    3
    4
    5
    If learn, I will teach you. To prove you want to learn, rewrite it all without AI.
    If you want to give your opinion here, give it. No one here will beg for your opinion.

    Shila
    Shila's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 7,384
    3
    3
    5
    Shila's avatar
    Shila
    3
    3
    5
    -->
    @Clausewitzian
    I suspect, Saul felt the sect would die if more weren't allowed to join. Therefor he got rid of circumcision, sabbath, kosher, and many other things required of jews, to make the faith appear more welcoming to Gentiles, and it worked. Gentiles joined fast, and the faith spread steadily. 
    Jesus appeared to Paul in a vision and asked him to stop persecuting Christians.
    Paul's Three Encounters with Christ Jesus in Acts - Taylor ...Yes, the Bible records that Jesus appeared to Paul in a vision on the road to Damascus. This event is described in Acts 9, where Paul, then known as Saul, was persecuting Christians. While traveling to Damascus, he was struck by a bright light and heard a voice asking him why he was persecuting Jesus. Paul then identified the voice as Jesus, and this experience led to his conversion and subsequent ministry as an apostle.


    Clausewitzian
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 10
    0
    0
    6
    Clausewitzian's avatar
    Clausewitzian
    0
    0
    6
    -->
    @Shila
    Yeah, so it's Paul's word, against all the previous disciples. Paul's word about the divinity of Christ, Paul's word and interpretation about the abandonment of the covenant between God and the Israelites. Paul who turned what was a sect of Judaism into something devoid of Jewishness, except the disciples who continued their practice of Judaism until their dying day. 

    The evidence of all this comes from one man who never met Christ in the flesh, yet knew him well enough to contradict earlier teachings, and the original disciples. 

    Doesn't hold much weight.
    Shila
    Shila's avatar
    Debates: 0
    Posts: 7,384
    3
    3
    5
    Shila's avatar
    Shila
    3
    3
    5
    -->
    @Clausewitzian
    Yeah, so it's Paul's word, against all the previous disciples. Paul's word about the divinity of Christ, Paul's word and interpretation about the abandonment of the covenant between God and the Israelites. Paul who turned what was a sect of Judaism into something devoid of Jewishness, except the disciples who continued their practice of Judaism until their dying day. 

    The evidence of all this comes from one man who never met Christ in the flesh, yet knew him well enough to contradict earlier teachings, and the original disciples. 

    Doesn't hold much weight.
    Yes, the apostle Paul received his Christian faith and teachings through a direct revelation from Jesus Christ, not from humans. He stated in Galatians 1:11-12 that he received the gospel "not from man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ". This revelation occurred on the road to Damascus, where Jesus appeared to Saul and told him to go to the city and he would be told what to do.