We should deport black people back to Africa

Author: RemyBrown

Posts

Hot
Total: 26
Topic's author
#1
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 581
3
2
6
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
3
2
6
Both of the following conditions must be accurate for a black person to get deported back to Africa:

  1. They have to be 50% or more FBA (which most are).
  2. They have to willingly get deported.  If they don't want to get deported, then they don't get deported.  Burning their property would and should be illegal, but their consent is required.

Now, you may ask, why would an FBA want to get deported?  Because they do research:

Views of reparations for slavery in US vary widely by race and ethnicity | Pew Research Center states that while an overwhelming majority of  FBAs support reparations, large majorities of every other racial group are against it.  In addition, the following 3 claims are true:

  1. We are moving further and further away from Jim Crow and slavery; this means support for reparations is expected to drop.
  2. Most of the immigrants coming here will be Hispanic or Asian. These groups are already majority anti reparations (I mean, they didn't even know slavery happened here that well because they're from somewhere else) and that's going to increase as time goes on.  Even the black immigrants are anti reperations.
  3. FBAs intermarry with non FBAs, and their kid is probably going to be less hardcore reparations than their parents because they are half and half; and then they will probably marry someone who is not FBA majority and their kids are probably going to have an anti reparations mindset.

It is highly unlikely that reparations will ever for a long enough time period gain majority support among the American public.  So I think we should deport consenting FBAs who understand that they won't get what they want.  Any job they do if they get consensually deported, import an African immigrant to do them.




#2
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 586
3
3
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
3
5
-->
@RemyBrown
They have to willingly get deported
So your argument is that they should be allowed to move to Africa if they want, and get help in moving there if they want?

Okay. I guess the part where people can disagree is in "getting help to move there". Not everyone approves of encouraging people to leave America, even if almost no one would agree to move to Africa.
#3
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,290
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@RemyBrown
Views of reparations for slavery in US vary widely by race and ethnicity | Pew Research Center states that while an overwhelming majority of  FBAs support reparations, large majorities of every other racial group are against it.  In addition, the following 3 claims are true:

  1. We are moving further and further away from Jim Crow and slavery; this means support for reparations is expected to drop.
  2. Most of the immigrants coming here will be Hispanic or Asian. These groups are already majority anti reparations (I mean, they didn't even know slavery happened here that well because they're from somewhere else) and that's going to increase as time goes on.  Even the black immigrants are anti reperations.
  3. FBAs intermarry with non FBAs, and their kid is probably going to be less hardcore reparations than their parents because they are half and half; and then they will probably marry someone who is not FBA majority and their kids are probably going to have an anti reparations mindset.
Blacks should demand reparations. Slavery is what led to black poverty.
#4
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 586
3
3
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
3
5
-->
@Shila
Blacks should demand reparations. Slavery is what led to black poverty.
Not just slavery. There was extreme racism in the USA for a long time. Even after slavery ended, getting a good job, decent place to live in and good education as a black person was very difficult. This improved over time, but the disadvantage still remains.
#5
n8nrgim
n8nrgim's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,213
3
2
5
n8nrgim's avatar
n8nrgim
3
2
5
current black poverty isn't mostly tied to slavery... it's tied to toxic aspects of black culture 
#6
n8nrgim
n8nrgim's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,213
3
2
5
n8nrgim's avatar
n8nrgim
3
2
5
-->
@Shila
see last post
#7
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,290
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@n8nrgim
current black poverty isn't mostly tied to slavery... it's tied to toxic aspects of black culture 
By 2030 the majority of Christians will be in Africa.
Topic's author
#8
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 581
3
2
6
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
3
2
6
-->
@Shila
Blacks should demand reparations. Slavery is what led to black poverty.
They can demand it, but it won't happen because Hispanics and Asians coming here are going to be anti reparations (honestly, I'm anti reparations; I'm a white man with white opinions).  But it's hopeless for FBAs that are pro reparations, so they should just bail on America.
Topic's author
#9
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 581
3
2
6
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
3
2
6
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Not everyone approves of encouraging people to leave America
Not everyone approves of homosexuality being legalized; you won't find 100% approval on any policy and that's par for the course.


#10
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 586
3
3
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
3
5
-->
@RemyBrown
Not everyone approves of homosexuality being legalized; you won't find 100% approval on any policy and that's par for the course
I wasnt making an argument against your case. I was saying who could debate against your case.

Topic's author
#11
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 581
3
2
6
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
3
2
6
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Alright; my bad.

Why would someone be against encouraging people to leave America?
#12
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 27,610
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@RemyBrown
You are assuming there is another country that would take them in. You would be surprised at what the global perceptions are.
Topic's author
#13
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 581
3
2
6
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
3
2
6
-->
@Greyparrot
I was thinking of putting them in a French speaking African country to try and get that country to go Anglophone.  Use the blacks to linguistically conquer to some extent.  If they refuse, then it's irrelevant because the left has been bitching about, "No human being is illegal!".

I'm not ashamed to be a white charismatic man.

Maybe spread them out so they would be the elites in Africa and so they assimilate other people there (because a lot of Africans in French Africa aren't fluent in French).
#14
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,662
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8
-->
@Shila

By 2030 the majority of Christians will be in Africa.
Tru-dat!
#15
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 27,610
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@RemyBrown
Again, there are not many countries who would even possibly agree to accept those refugees.
#16
Mharman
Mharman's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 6,731
3
6
10
Mharman's avatar
Mharman
3
6
10
wtf is this thread lol
Topic's author
#17
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 581
3
2
6
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
3
2
6
-->
@Greyparrot
Again, there are not many countries who would even possibly agree to accept those refugees.
Why would I care?  Who would win in a conflict?  America, or Chad?  Chad is Chad in name only; America is the real Chad.  Would Cameroon beat America?  How about the DRC?  Madagascar?  They like to move it move it, so we can move it move it with these FBAs that we're sending back.
#18
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 78
Posts: 3,808
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
-->
@RemyBrown

It's difficult to decide if your argument is more FBA or reparations. The two are not natural co-habitatants of the same theory, but you have shoved them together.

Re: FBA [Fundamentally Black Americans]:  I presume that implies that some Blacks claim to be responsible for the foundation of the USA, but that event did not occur for another roughly 168 years [1787 - initial ratification of the US Constitution, which officially established the Government of the USA], whereas BLM, and, I presume, therefore, FBA, assigned 1619 as that founding event, when in reality, that date was just the first year Black slaves were introduced to American shores. However, there were also free Blacks in America, some who may have arrived before 1619 - I don't know. Definitively afterward. However, what defines race, black, or otherwise, such as Asian, Hispanic, or White? As it happens, since 2003, with the completion of the Human Genome Project, there is no genetic justification for race; it is a social construct, only, but no DNA  has genetic definition of "racial" distinctions. Humans are 99.999...% identical, but the differences do not define any racial physical features. They just don't, period. Oops. Yeah, some kid on another site [anyone younger than me - at 75 - is a "kid"] tried to convince me that saliva tests can identify race. No, they cannot. They identify by geographic region, such as that most blacks genetically and geographically place their ancestry in Africa. Same with Asia's, in Asia, and Whites in Europe. But those distinctions are not 100% accurate, because, clearly, geographically, many Asans, Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites are born in America, and not in Asia, Africa, Spain, Mexico, et al, or Europe, ancestry be damned.

Re: reparations: regardless of the heated argument for and against [and both side ought to settle down, because...], the US Constitution happens to have a word [actually, three words] about that. It is called  ex post facto. Ref; Article I, Section 9, clause 3: "No bill of attainder, or ex post facto law shall be passed." Ignore "bill of attainder" - it is not relevant to this discussion. But, ex post facto is: it means: establishments of any law that makes criminal act only after it is committed. From 1619, until abolishment by the 13A in 1865, slavery was legal as of 1619 in identified colonies and ultimately those States at the establishment of the US as of 1787. As of 1865, therefore, slavery was abolished as illegal, and, therefor, there was, after 1865, no basis on which to justify reparation payments, /That is the condition today. Reparations are unconstitutional, regardless of argument to the contrary.
Topic's author
#19
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 581
3
2
6
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
3
2
6
-->
@fauxlaw
We both don't like reparations, but most FBAs do (and they aren't changing their minds because they are FBAs with FBA opinions).  Hispanics and Asians don't support reparations.  I want FBA people to feel racially isolated and scared that they will never get reparations so they have the desire to move out of America and so the inner cities can finally get cleaned up by replacing FBAs with African immigrants so it's not racist.

FBA culture is just trash and I want it out of the country if the FBAs are willing to self deport (but if they don't want to leave, then don't force them too, but verbally encourage them, import more immigrants who are going to be anti reparations, make FBAs feel isolated so they just bail on America).  The hood sucks.
#20
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,743
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
No african american is going to be deported because this is part of the karma whiteys have to pay.

The karma will end out only when whiteys and blackies get mixed up. So if I were you I'd be working on it already.
#21
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 78
Posts: 3,808
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
-->
@IlDiavolo
 part of the karma whiteys have to pay.
Why? It was not Europeans selling black slaves from Africa. It was other Africans capturing different tribes to sell to the Europeans. Blacks selling blacks. That wasn't racism, either, that was bullying. Just like here in the States, black-on-black crime is highly prevalent. That's obviously not racism. Race does not exist, and nor should the discrimination.
#22
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,743
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@fauxlaw
Why? It was not Europeans selling black slaves from Africa. It was other Africans capturing different tribes to sell to the Europeans. Blacks selling blacks. That wasn't racism, either, that was bullying. Just like here in the States, black-on-black crime is highly prevalent. That's obviously not racism. Race does not exist, and nor should the discrimination.
Sure, but the whites bought the blacks. Besides, Americans had a terrible civil war over it.

Nobody runs away from the karma.

By the way, why do you have the French flag in your profile image? Vous etes francais? Peut etre vos parents?
#23
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 78
Posts: 3,808
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
Sure, but the whites bought the blacks. Besides, Americans had a terrible civil war over it.
Yes, they did, but from Europeans, who were, as well, slaveowners.  But, the Civil War was not entirely a war over slavery, but the Southern economy suddenly collapsing because it was entirely structured on slavery. That is no excuse; slavery should have never been instigated in the colonies, but that's water under the bridge. It was one of the flaws of the Constitution when ratified, that slavery was allowed to continue. The South nearly collapsed, anyway, in  spite of war. The other two issues were women's suffrage and a complete and inclusive voting policy. Voting is o subject that engrosses the amendments more than any others single subject. Fully eight amendments address the issue, and it still has holes.

Nobody runs away from karma.
If one is in agreement with karma, why run from it?. If they're ignorant of it, the consequence may still have no dire effect.

why do you have the French flag in your profile image? Vous etes francais? Peut etre vos parents?
Mes ancêtres étaient français depuis le XIe siècle, près de Versailles, en ligne directe de mon père. Nous sommes alors partis en Écosse, puis en Amérique en 1625.
J'ai vécu en Provence pendant 3 ans, je parle la langue et j'aime le pays, je célèbre toujours le 14 juillet
Topic's author
#24
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 581
3
2
6
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
3
2
6
-->
@IlDiavolo
The karma will end out only when whiteys and blackies get mixed up. So if I were you I'd be working on it already.
But I don't want mixed kids because kids are too expensive (same is true for white kids).
#25
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,743
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@RemyBrown
But I don't want mixed kids because kids are too expensive (same is true for white kids).
Not necessarily you. America needs kids to keep up and someone has to make them.

#26
IlDiavolo
IlDiavolo's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,743
3
2
5
IlDiavolo's avatar
IlDiavolo
3
2
5
-->
@fauxlaw
If one is in agreement with karma, why run from it?. If they're ignorant of it, the consequence may still have no dire effect.
Well, the karma is just an excuse that I posed in order to find a solution to a difficult problem. So, I think Americans need to mix up.

I don't know how mixed up you're but I kind of noted that most people that consider themselves as blacks are not 100% blacks. For example, I don’t know how Americans consider Lenny Kravitz but to me this guy is a mestizo, not black, not just because of his surname but also because of his physical traits. Obama is also a mestizo, he doesn’t look like a black, black.

It's a shame though that American mestizos don't want to see themselves as they are. When I posted some remarks like this in Youtube my comments get deleted inmediatly, I assume there are Americans who don't like it. There is nothing wrong about it, rather all the contrary, that would help to get rid of the main labels Americans use to differentiate one another: black and white. Introducing a new label that represents a more homogenous American would help end up with this problem you have been bearing all along.