Canadians are xenephobic

Author: RemyBrown

Posts

Total: 13
Topic's author
#1
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 636
3
2
6
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
3
2
6

The left thinks it's ok, because it's Canada.  God forbid Trump do something like this (Because I'm principled, I'm anti deportations regardless).  Don't expect the left to be principled though; they'll let Canada get away with xenephobic immigration policies.

They can deny it all they want; but at this point, I think I'd rather have them be honest and admit they're partisan hacks.  Just come as advertised.  Their mind won't be changed on this because they are emotional people and you can't reason with emotional people (even if they mask their emotion).  Just come as advertised.

And if you're going to be emotional and unchangable in your views on Canada, then the internet isn't the right place for you.  My mind is unchangable in the annexation of Canada, but I use logical points whereas it seems they don't.

If your brains are in fact emotional, then politics isn't for you as it would make you scared and that's bad for your mental health.
#2
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 36
Posts: 7,845
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
If your brains are in fact emotional, then politics isn't for you as it would make you scared and that's bad for your mental health.
Its also not for you if your IQ is lower than 150. The problem is that if your IQ is 150 you are probably smart enough to avoid politics so we might have to create a law to force smart people into politics at gun point.
#3
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 36
Posts: 7,845
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
We also have to make a second law that they cannot remove the law to force people with high IQs into politics at the point of a gun.
#4
ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,525
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@WyIted
We also have to make a second law that they cannot remove the law to force people with high IQs into politics at the point of a gun.
ahhhh *taps head* thinking five, I mean 1 move ahead...

#5
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 36
Posts: 7,845
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
We also have to make a law that they can't remove the second law.
Topic's author
#6
RemyBrown
RemyBrown's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 636
3
2
6
RemyBrown's avatar
RemyBrown
3
2
6
-->
@WyIted
The problem is that if your IQ is 150 you are probably smart enough to avoid politics so we might have to create a law to force smart people into politics at gun point.
I wasn't calling for forcing the stupid to avoid politics; I was calling for encouraging the stupid to avoid politics.  Play Bingo or something.  Play Bingo, a Soduko, Minecraft, but don't watch emotional news; it's bad for your mental health.

One of these examples is my Dad.  He is hardcore anti Trump (which I hate Trump as well), but with the Obama speech at the democrat rally, he was saying, "I'm so excited for what Obama is going to say!".  Anyone with a high IQ (whether they like Trump or not) would tell him, "Dad; why are you excited?  You know Obama is going to back Harris.  It's not a surprise.  It's like saying, "I can't wait to see how California turns out in a generic POTUS election.  You know it's going to go blue"".

If you like politics because of policy, then politics is for you.  If you like politics because it's a show, then politics is not for you.  Watch a Broadway musical or something, but don't vote because you are easy to manipulate (all you need is a big show from someone you already trust for you to like them).

Because of that, I believe all future debates should not be televised, but transcripted.  Remove all chrisma that wins over stupid people.  If you want to vote, then you should get a transcript of the POTUS debate, you know the POTUS candidates as, "Person A", "Person B", etc, you should have to study what they support in the debate when you don't know their names or party, and then vote based on THAT information.  

The type of people that are into emotion wouldn't study the information, they wouldn't vote, and they can enjoy Broadway musicals where their brains have better mental health.
#7
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 851
3
4
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
5
We also have to make a law that they can't remove the second law.
🤔🤔

Maybe make one law which already says that one law cant be removed ever.

Like this:
"Law 1: Smart people must do politics and Law 1 cant ever be removed."
#8
Math_Enthusiast
Math_Enthusiast's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 241
1
2
8
Math_Enthusiast's avatar
Math_Enthusiast
1
2
8
-->
@TheGreatSunGod

Like this:
"Law 1: Smart people must do politics and Law 1 cant ever be removed."
Unfortunately self-reference renders this meaningless.

#9
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 851
3
4
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
5
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
Unfortunately self-reference renders this meaningless
It is circular law. It protects itself there. So it cannot ever be removed.

The alternative is:

Law 1: Law 2 and Law 3 cannot be removed.
Law 2: Smart people must do politics.
Law 3: Law 2 and Law 1 cannot be removed.
#10
Math_Enthusiast
Math_Enthusiast's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 241
1
2
8
Math_Enthusiast's avatar
Math_Enthusiast
1
2
8
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Proposition 1: Proposition 2 is true.
Proposition 2: Proposition 1 is false.

Self-reference still causes issues when it's indirect. Basically, for proposition 1 to be well-defined, we must have defined proposition 2 first, but we can't define proposition 2 without proposition 1. Then again, the US Constitution is self-referential (not to mention that it leaves phrases like "necessary and proper" up to interpretation as if that isn't insanely vague) so why not have laws that could shatter our logical framework if taken too literally.

#11
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,491
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@RemyBrown
If your brains are in fact emotional, then politics isn't for you as it would make you scared and that's bad for your mental health.
Americans were raised on that belief. It helped them survive 300 years of slavery and a civil war.
#12
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 851
3
4
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
5
-->
@Math_Enthusiast
Proposition 1: Proposition 2 is true.
Proposition 2: Proposition 1 is false.
Yeah, but this isnt about being true now.

This is about ability of people to remove laws legally.

There is no other way than circle to create laws which cannot be removed.
#13
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,491
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Proposition 1: Proposition 2 is true.
Proposition 2: Proposition 1 is false.
Yeah, but this isnt about being true now.

This is about ability of people to remove laws legally.

There is no other way than circle to create laws which cannot be removed.
Slavery was legal till it was abolished.