Pascal's wager

Author: TheGreatSunGod

Posts

Total: 34
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 7,542
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Unless you are arguing that muslims must exterminate all other religions, then it is based on self defense, and must be too.
What does Islam say about other religions?
Tolerance in the Quran is based on the belief that good is more vital than evil. Because of this, the Quran teaches its followers to always forgive, especially about other religions, to have a noble mind, a forgiving attitude, and humane values, and to accept the rights of others.

Hero1000
Hero1000's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 78
0
1
5
Hero1000's avatar
Hero1000
0
1
5
You can google definition of worship. Hint: there is more than one.
I'll help you out then, within the context of the Quran, worship here specifically refers a narrower range of definitions. Such as the ritual act of worship.


Assumption.
They aren't, the first one is based on a combination of the definition of Atheist and my personal testimony, the second is based on the same premise as the first, the third is based on the fact that, unless the individual we're talking about has some extra form of love for money, it is the same for them as it is for me, a medium for wealth and trade.

You'll have to put a convincing argument why, for the average atheist 50 dollars in their hand is more valuable to them than 50 dollars in my hand would be to me.
And please, do give an answer that's different than "because the 50 dollars is more important to them than God", that would still do nothing to explain why money would be more important to them than it would be to me.

This is nonsense argument. We are talking about people who die as atheists here.
Because of how Pascal's wager works? Very well. People who die atheists, especially those of ignorance, will be punished, but can be forgiven during their punishment, even after death. Mushriks have no such chance, at least according to God's words.

So now you pretend to know what Allah thinks here.
I am only reciting my understanding of God's words. And to my understanding God said that Shirk is unforgivable unlike other sins which are forgivable.
Hero1000
Hero1000's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 78
0
1
5
Hero1000's avatar
Hero1000
0
1
5
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
Unless you are arguing that muslims must exterminate all other religions, then it is based on self defense, and must be too.
Ok so its self-defense, why can't it also be based on religion at the same time? Why are the two mutually exclusive?

And for that matter, why does "based on religion" have to equate to "must exterminate all other religions"?
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 919
3
4
5
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
5
-->
@Hero1000
I'll help you out then, within the context of the Quran, worship here specifically refers a narrower range of definitions. Such as the ritual act of worship
Sadly, Quran doesnt come with own dictionary, and word "worship" wasnt even used in quote in your link.

You'll have to put a convincing argument
When your arguments are assumptions, I dont need to do anything there.

Very well. People who die atheists, especially those of ignorance, will be punished, but can be forgiven during their punishment, even after death. Mushriks have no such chance, at least according to God's words.
Quran calls polytheists non-believers. So the term non-believers isnt used for atheists there. Also, you are confusing "cannot be forgiven" with "will result in eternal punishment" there. The conclusion doesnt follow from that premise.

So lets say there is a Christian who donates to charity, doesnt commit adultery, doesnt murder...ect.

He burns in Hell forever then? Correct?

Ok so its self-defense, why can't it also be based on religion at the same time? Why are the two mutually exclusive?
If it is based on self defense, then if those other religions didnt attack you, you wouldnt attack them despite great difference in religions. So self defense was necessary part, not mere difference in religions there.