-->
@iamanabanana
Okay, I guess I misunderstood what you were saying in some respect.
Why is Austin in your PoE though, he claimed gladiator which is a confirmable role?
Okay, I guess I misunderstood what you were saying in some respect.Why is Austin in your PoE though, he claimed gladiator which is a confirmable role?
Also a role being confirmable doesnt mean he is town. Anyways, hes not a strong scum read, but I did feel he was overselling his towniness a bit too far.
austin [is potential scum] for "I have to be town, I wouldnt do x and x otherwise"
I don't see this as being AI for Austin in particular; he often uses a lot of self-analysis in his posts, both as town and as mafia.Maybe you are right, but I would have just assumed all that stuff as true if he didn't point it out, so that's the only reason I thought it was odd.
Btw, don't hammer early, we should use all the time we have.
Not sure what to make of banana's reasoning on me; me making self-analysis is NAI by itself, but the thing is, even if my analysis isn't necessarily reliable, that doesn't really invalidate my posts that are being analyzed in the first place.Phrased that kinda poorly so: I can understand her being hesitant on her read on me; but I would trust it more if she gave an independent attempt to townread my posts, whereas right now, her read comes down to:
So it feels like I'm just in POE despite her not really having read me (implied by saying I'm not a scum read, i.e. I am a scum read to some extent); and it can't be for the self-analysis itself, because other people have said it's NAI
and I don't really like how she just ignores my role; even if it *can* be scum, it's still town the majority of the time. Feels kinda hedgy.
I can’t read through all this coherently atm but want to put out before we full pressure someone. We should absolutely make sure they are in a heavy lynch pool. If we start doing this shit where we push and all the claims start sounding good or well worded. Which I believe pie has already said about the two out there, we are going to take the risk of jumping between people and having to many claims come out. If much more come out this dp and we don’t commit to someone, we are giving mafia a huge advantage at night.
We need to lock in on someone but need to lock in on behavior. Specially if there is a fake claim. I just can see this happening. We go person by person and every claim sounds good and then we’ve given up to much.
Love this reaction from Mharman...
I don't see this as being AI for Austin in particular; he often uses a lot of self-analysis in his posts, both as town and as mafia.Maybe you are right, but I would have just assumed all that stuff as true if he didn't point it out, so that's the only reason I thought it was odd.Like... it's shifting a NAI thing at best into potential scum? Idk, maybe I'm reading too much into it, but it feels like a contradiction. Banana, could you explain your reasoning here?
Pick out of Wylted, WF, Mharman for the last claim
I do not agree with one more claim for what’s it worth but we need to decide somrthing. I much prefer just picking and lynching.
Do you think we have enough info to not lynch blind currently? If we target someone the character and role will get claimed anyway. I am just saying we pick that person off behavior and should not be to heavily swayed by their claim.If we keep outing stuff and not following through we are cucking ourself. If we actually stay with a lynch pool, I’m fine with that.Are those 3 hour final lynch pool. Cus they are not mine
Pick out of Wylted, WF, Mharman for the last claim