The window to edit/delete is 15 mins but the website's info says 30.

Author: AdaptableRatman

Posts

Total: 71
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 110
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
the best use of his time is to burn in jewish hell for worshipping a fake messiah
Sir.Lancelot
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Debates: 198
Posts: 1,012
4
6
9
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
4
6
9
-->
@FishChaser
Is there a jewish hell? 
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 110
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
There should be but there isn't
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 37
Posts: 8,168
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@FishChaser
I recently discovered that Christianity is objectively wrong and as also been falsified by Jewish scholars.
That's just what they tell you as a cope. Notice how my argument against Mormon ism is undeniable and objectively true such as Joseph Smith was arrested for antiquities fraud prior to founding Mormonism and that Mormonism is based on Joseph Smith finding antiquities and interpreting them by putting his head in a hat and looking at rocks

While you will not see a single Jew come in here and say anything except the cope of Jesus fulfilling prophecy in two parts while simultaneously theorizing that the prophecies will be fulfilled in two parts but reasoning two messiah's to explain it when a 2nd coming would just as easily explain it. 

They don't have real arguments.
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 1,018
3
3
7
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
3
7
-->
@WyIted
Plus our founders were very devout Jews.

Luke was gentile, the rest Jewish.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 37
Posts: 8,168
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@Sir.Lancelot

Is there a jewish hell? 
It's referred to as SHEOL and it just means underground. 

It was reasoned by Christian philosophers that a hell must exist and as well indicated by Jesus actually physically going to help to help with some condemned souls
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 110
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@WyIted
I'm reading a book called Let's Get Biblical by Rabbi Tovia Singer and he points out all the times the new testament contradicts the old testament as well as how the church blended pagan concepts with Christianity.
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 110
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
If the founders were such devout Jews, why did they feel the need to misquote the old testament to fit their narrative
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 37
Posts: 8,168
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@FishChaser
I'm reading a book called Let's Get Biblical by Rabbi Tovia Singer and he points out all the times the new testament contradicts the old testament as well as how the church blended pagan concepts with Christianity.
I will see if I can give it a look. Maybe it will change my mind
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 1,018
3
3
7
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
3
7
-->
@WyIted
You betray Jesus to even say that so nonchalantly.
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 110
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
"Looking at information that may challenge your worldview is a betrayal, Jesus would want you to be so afraid that he might not exist that you are afraid to look"
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 37
Posts: 8,168
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
You betray Jesus to even say that so nonchalantly.
That's a fair criticism . My faith is absolute at certain times and wavers at other times and both of the thought processes can leak through. I can examine the evidence without thinking it has a good chance of changing my mind. 


I don't know if it's a sin to allow that lack of faith to be put forward like that especially if it's temporary. I know it's likely a bad ideal in front of anybody who I am in charge of but i am not sure its wrong to be that forward with my internal thoughts on a debate site. 

I guess my words could be the crack needed for the worst part of me to have an opening in my thoughts. I'd need some evidence that expressing my doubt in times of less certainty is unethical before I would change my behavior though.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 37
Posts: 8,168
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
-->
@FishChaser
"Looking at information that may challenge your worldview is a betrayal, Jesus would want you to be so afraid that he might not exist that you are afraid to look"
To be fair to him I don't think he was criticizing giving other arguments a chance but me expressing the possibility it would change my mind. It does show a lack of faith but I also feel like it's wrong to not give another argument a chance. It's a waste of time to look at arguments though if there is zero chance it changes my mind
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 1,018
3
3
7
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
3
7
-->
@WyIted
Take a good look at the members of this website, not just thread. Separate those blatantly against Jesus from those blatantly for him and you are exception to the rule as you regularly violate Biblical and Catechismic teachings.

Ask yourself a simple question, who is consistently more like who you want to be and who is less?

Not who has what you want, who is who you want to be like.

For me, it was either Muslim or Christian by far. The way I concluded Christianity was the true one is a story that involves primarily a long path of God giving me signs and a life path that made sense towards it.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 37
Posts: 8,168
3
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
3
4
9
Ask yourself a simple question, who is consistently more loke who you want to be and who is less?
Obviously the Christians here behave with more honor. Just in general. I wouldn't consider anyone here a role model though. Some role models used to be around I could look at but no more. 

What do the saints say about attacking sacred cows like I enjoy doing? 

At some point attacking sacred cows is just being against something and not about being for something. 

Perhaps it's time to stop caring about being against things and be for some things.

Mharman
Mharman's avatar
Debates: 23
Posts: 7,460
3
6
10
Mharman's avatar
Mharman
3
6
10
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Unfortunately, Mike is AWOL… unless mods can change that area of the site, don’t expect it to change soon.
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 110
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@WyIted
I don't think the Christians here are any better than anyone else. Adaptable and Shila are both Catholics and they are both ass holes.
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@FishChaser
Dont you think you insulted him enough now? Please stop. Pretty please.
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 110
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@TheGreatSunGod
I thirst for blood.
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@FishChaser
Can you stop the thirst? Prettiest please.
Sidewalker
Sidewalker's avatar
Debates: 8
Posts: 3,469
3
2
5
Sidewalker's avatar
Sidewalker
3
2
5
-->
@AdaptableRatman
You aren't really all that adaptable Ratman, maybe your name should be UnadaptableRatman.

If you were adapable, you would just do what everybody else does, ignore FishChaser, he is so desperate for attention, in his whack job mind, he wins when you complain about him.






AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 1,018
3
3
7
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
3
7
-->
@Sidewalker
Or does he win when you all are too spineless to correct him?

Also who is really winning? A troll?

I have no idea what game theory is in your or sir lancelot's head. I made a thread about something site related, a troll showed up, I stood up to the troll and then I am told there is an imaginary win conditon of letting a Hitlerite roam free.

Read your Bible btw. Read Old Testament, Ezekiel in particular. See what it says about those who passively allow evil.

I am not losing nor in the wrong.

As for the guy I have a restraining order with, he will be dealt with soon.
Sir.Lancelot
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Debates: 198
Posts: 1,012
4
6
9
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
4
6
9
-->
@FishChaser
Can you quit talking to or about Adaptable?

I need you for my Tournament.
Getting banned will jeapordize that.
FishChaser
FishChaser's avatar
Debates: 110
Posts: 321
2
4
9
FishChaser's avatar
FishChaser
2
4
9
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Ok I'll talk about sidewalker instead, that guy is a retard. I looked at his determinism debate and he thinks determinism is wrong because you can't be right about things unless you had the choice to be right. Ok so then you can't be wrong about things unless you have the choice to be wrong. What a retard.
Sir.Lancelot
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Debates: 198
Posts: 1,012
4
6
9
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
4
6
9
-->
@FishChaser
I like Sidewalker, but this is an excellent start.
Thank you, FishChaser!
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 1,018
3
3
7
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
3
7
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 79
Posts: 4,015
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
Some people use Google as if it were the new holy writ replacing the said "nonsense" of not just the Holy Bible, but other holy writ of other faiths... the Quran, the  Torah, the Tai-Chi, the Veda, A Book of Shadows...  Who was it who said Google is the new word. particularly when. it has caved to allow A.I. to influence our access to information, as if A.I. does not begin with "Artificial," a perfectly adequate word tor describe most of its content.
So, believe Google if that is all the source material y'all want to consider.
Personally, I don't. Not to mention that, personally, I have another source to seek [not even that which you are thinking, but anyone who knows me what that source is], and while I do embrace the Book of Mormon, along with thee Holy Bible, which I challenge those to whom this is directed, and y'all know who you are, you have not even read cover to cover, and, until you do, what you think you know is what comes from the back end of a bull. Since y'all have not yet read the Bible cover to cover, either, the same challenge is before you.
Even Wiki admits it is flawed, inaccurate, because it admits that it is open to being edited by anybody at all, including y'all. That's supposed to be scholastic? Well, Google cites Wiki, as, and often, so does their god, A.I.
Sir.Lancelot
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Debates: 198
Posts: 1,012
4
6
9
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
4
6
9
-->
@fauxlaw
As a Mormon, what are your feelings on Catholicism? I've been studying christianity lately and it would seem currently, that if I did end up converting. Catholicism remains a strong option. I went to a local Barnes & Noble the other day and bought The Catholic Bible from the category section labeled study bibles.
TheGreatSunGod
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
Debates: 29
Posts: 1,396
3
4
8
TheGreatSunGod's avatar
TheGreatSunGod
3
4
8
-->
@fauxlaw
the Quran, the  Torah, the Tai-Chi, the Veda, A Book of Shadows
You know about Book of Shadows? Now I am impressed.
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 1,018
3
3
7
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
3
7
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Unwise first purchase. Cath OT and NT except 7 OT books are all freely legally accessible on online Bible study sites.