-->
@iamanabanana
Can you explain your remark from earlier about how Savant and I have to be scum, while Mikal’s results implicate you?
Game Show Mafia DP4
Posts
Read-only
Total:
167
-->
@iamanabanana
What are the fakesI tried doing one without punctuation, one where every other letter was capitalized, etc
Why only respond to Mharman? This point had been brought up earlier multiple times.
-->
@iamanabanana
I don’t see any post where you didn’t give any punctuation…
-->
@Savant
She was responding to Moozer earlier
-->
@Mharman
@iamanabanana
Can you explain your remark from earlier about how Savant and I have to be scum, while Mikal’s results implicate you?
What's even the point of this weird tactic? Can banana not respond to something that Mikal has brought up multiple times without you rephrasing the same question? Not sure if this is a distancing play or trying to make it so banana doesn't look as defensive. All it does is look scripted.
-->
@Mharman
She was responding to Moozer earlier
Sure, but this is an example of ignoring a particular point when I bring it up and then answering the same point when you bring it up. And you phrased it in the most softball way possible like a scripted damage control interview.
-->
@Savant
She didn’t respond to Mikal, but did answer me when I asked what her secret agendas was. Because I want an answer from her just as much as everyone else does, I asked again.
With banana it's "can you explain?" but with anyone else it's an instant scum read...
-->
@Mikal
You said you tracked me so your lying
-->
@Savant
I asked her that way because I don’t like the post, but I’ve been townreading her, so I think she could just be TI
-->
@Mharman
Can you explain your remark from earlier about how Savant and I have to be scum, while Mikal’s results implicate you?
I didnt say you did I? I mean savant and mikal
-->
@Mharman
I asked her that way because I don’t like the post, but I’ve been townreading her, so I think she could just be TI
Or because banana didn't want to come off defensive answering the accusation...
run on, no periods, not punctuation, couldnt remember.
-->
@Savant
Dude. I also just told Mikal to out a gambit if he had done one. I did that because I’m questioning if he did something stupid like fake claim beloved princess as town for whatever reason. If I’m giving Banana puts, I’m also giving Mikal outs.
At which point you should understand if questioning people out of prudence.
-->
@Mharman
Dude. I also just told Mikal to out a gambit if he had done one.
That question wasn't rephrasing something that had already been brought up. Also the interaction between you and banana looked way more scripted and unnatural.
-->
@Savant
Once again, you have a case that relies on you interpreting everything in the scummiest possible way.
-->
@Mharman
Once again, you have a case that relies on you interpreting everything in the scummiest possible way.
No, if I was interpreting everything as scummy I would be scum reading everyone.
-->
@Savant
That question wasn't rephrasing something that had already been brought up.
This is pedantic.
Also the interaction between you and banana looked way more scripted and unnatural.
So I can’t question her. Okay sure buddy.
Also she just switched her agenda. Bro I’m dying. Lmao
-->
@Mharman
Savant voted me and no one is quick hammering, so unless its moozer the scum team is exactly savant and mharman.Anyone find it convienent that mikals been pushing me since day phase 1 and I just "Happen" to show up on tracker results that he should have got yesterday???
Sorry meant savant and mikal
-->
@Savant
No, if I was interpreting everything as scummy I would be scum reading everyone
Im saying that you took one person in isolation, and cast everything they did in a scummy light.
-->
@Mikal
Also she just switched her agenda. Bro I’m dying. Lmao
I did not, that was a hidden agenda dummy. My actual agenda like I said earlier was to use a players name in an all caps post. You are purposely misrepresenting me, gaslighting me, and being a general obvious scum.
-->
@Mharman
So I can’t question her. Okay sure buddy.
Well it read very unnatural after you'd been sarcastic and accusatory in every other post.
Can you explain your remark from earlier about how Savant and I have to be scum, while Mikal’s results implicate you?
How is that not an obvious softball question that banana probably wrote herself?
-->
@Mharman
Im saying that you took one person in isolation, and cast everything they did in a scummy light.
No, I've scum read multiple people. Including WyIted who, mind you, was scum.
We lynch mikal today, savant tomorrow and town wins.
Mharm knows he is cooked because he’s so heavily fucked. That’s why he is not wanting to kill her lol. Wants to push a lynch on me cus he can’t nk me.
If he is town. Almost always banana should be in Poe at this point. He’s nervous because he has to lynch me lol.
Moozer and I are all but town locked so it doesn’t matter who he kills, there is still a town lock tomorrow. His path is to lynch me so they get 2 nks. It’s painful
-->
@iamanabanana
You literally still have not explained your read where you said mharm was confirmed scum
-->
@iamanabanana
We lynch mikal today, savant tomorrow and town wins
What even is your case for suspecting Mikal and I other than that we suspected Earth day 1? One incorrect read equals being scum? We lynched him yesterday, but that was hedging bets.
-->
@Mikal
You literally still have not explained your read where you said mharm was confirmed scum
I got my M's mixed up,. I meant you and savant obviously.
-->
@Savant
What even is your case for suspecting Mikal and I other than that we suspected Earth day 1? One incorrect read equals being scum? We lynched him yesterday, but that was hedging bets.
I have laid arguments against you both in past day phases, but they are all irrelevant now, because the fact that I haven't been quick hammered means both scum are already on my lynch.