Major site updates

Author: David

Posts

Pinned
Total: 132
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 2,695
3
4
8
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
4
8
The past 3 bans and 1 voting privilege restriction were largely due to my reports.

I will clean this up with the help of the Lord.
Sir.Lancelot
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Debates: 214
Posts: 1,192
4
6
9
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
4
6
9
Ignore the one pretending yo speak on my behalf. He is an abusive wreck of a user that abuses those he rpete ds to support as soon as they call him out.

I will tell you one thing:

Nobody here for a while shows their family and irl friends the site. They feel shame, its a closeted hobby. This stems from the terrible moderation.

I shall change that.
The past 3 bans and 1 voting privilege restriction were largely due to my reports.

I will clean this up with the help of the Lord.
Savior complex disguised as religious justice. The very fatality of faith.
Talking like you're changing the world by persecuting degeneracy on a dead platform.

Necessary and noble? Yes. But not heroic or divine. 
You are not The Chosen One. 
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 2,695
3
4
8
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
4
8
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Neither are you
Sir.Lancelot
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Debates: 214
Posts: 1,192
4
6
9
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
4
6
9
Is that the best you can come up with?

17 days later

fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 80
Posts: 4,363
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
I have another suggestion for the new site relative to another incentive to attract voters to debates. What if we give points [such as in debate leaderboard ratting points] to voters who vote for the eventual winner of the debate. That way...
1. a voter has incentive to vote in the first5 place
2. a voter has incentive to scrutinize the debate in more detail to determine who the winner truly should be by practical dissection of the participants' arguments, sourcing, etc.
3. There is potential for multiple voters to be awarded.
David
David's avatar
Debates: 93
Posts: 1,273
4
7
10
David's avatar
David
4
7
10
-->
@fauxlaw
I worry this will incentivize voting for the person who is already in the lead rather than voting objectively. 
Castin
Castin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,627
3
2
7
Castin's avatar
Castin
3
2
7
-->
@David
I take it the recent announcement means you still haven't heard from Mike.
David
David's avatar
Debates: 93
Posts: 1,273
4
7
10
David's avatar
David
4
7
10
-->
@Castin
Nope. Radio silence. Last message I got from Mike was 6/11. 
fauxlaw
fauxlaw's avatar
Debates: 80
Posts: 4,363
4
7
10
fauxlaw's avatar
fauxlaw
4
7
10
-->
@David
Re: your #126, I suppose that is possible, but he already leads voting almost 2-to-1 over the next most frequent voter, let alone the rest of us, but that's just evidence that he is a consistent, dedicated voter and that's not likely to change.
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 2,695
3
4
8
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
4
8
-->
@Lemming
@fauxlaw
@Sir.Lancelot

So far so good.

Keep your covers. Play your role.

The revolution is coming. The tides will turn. The Lord is with us. ✝️
Sir.Lancelot
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Debates: 214
Posts: 1,192
4
6
9
Sir.Lancelot's avatar
Sir.Lancelot
4
6
9
-->
@Lemming
@Savant
@LucyStarfire
Keep your covers. Play your role.

The revolution is coming. The tides will turn. The Lord is with us. ✝️
Adaptable reminds me of the Shaman Lady from Squid Game. 

Lunatic
Lunatic's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 10,910
3
3
6
Lunatic's avatar
Lunatic
3
3
6
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Adaptable reminds me of the Shaman Lady from Squid Game. 


XD