Trump Dumps The Ukraine

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte publicly pleaded with the Trump administration Wednesday to reverse its move to halt key weapons shipments to war-torn Ukraine.  On Tuesday, the White House confirmed that 155mm artillery rounds, Patriot air defense missiles, Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System missiles, Stinger missiles, AIM-7 missiles and Hellfire missiles meant to go to Ukraine will no longer be shipped due to stockpiles running low.

Surprised you do not have Trump somehow articulated in your username, so enamored are you with his mention, as if he occupies a deep region of the brain, rent-free.Just let go.

What floor do you own in a Trump Tower?      45-47?

The statement that NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte “publicly pleaded” with the Trump administration to reverse halted weapons shipments to Ukraine oversimplifies the situation and injects misleading tones into complex diplomatic and military decisions. While Donald Trump is indeed president as of 2025, decisions on arms transfers involve multiple layers of government and military logistics, not just a single executive directive. The pause on shipments like 155mm artillery rounds and Patriot missiles likely reflects real concerns about dwindling U.S. stockpiles and the need to balance support for Ukraine with readiness for broader US national defense, not a politically motivated ploy.

I do not own a floor in a tower; I own a house on [no mortgage] 10 acres in the Rockies at 7,500 feet elevation in a forest, and a 40-ft yacht moored in a harbor in Newport Beach.

How would America benefit from having less weapons and Ukraine dying in a completely unwinnable war where even if they win they are still stuck in a shit hole country?

It would help those trying to destroy America like the op.

True dat. 

Well said.

OMG, are you from Slovenia?

Bringing up Slovenia every time your intelligence is challenged isn’t a rebuttal, it’s a deflection. Whether it’s invoking Slovenia’s GDP, its education system, or cherry-picked historical trivia, none of it addresses the substance of the argument or critique being made. Using an unrelated country as a shield doesn’t demonstrate insight; it reveals insecurity. Intelligent discourse requires engagement with ideas, not a reflexive retreat into obscure national references to sidestep valid points.

Obsessing over Slovenia in this context is a textbook example of intellectual misdirection. It’s not about Slovenia itself, it’s about avoiding accountability for weak arguments. If your response to being called out on logical fallacies or misinformed claims is to start a lecture about Ljubljana or the Slovene language, you're not defending your position, you’re proving you don’t have one. If IQ is the topic, stick to reasoning and evidence. Geography won’t raise your score.

I'm invoking Slovenia's sex workers.

part of the "wit5=hout... verified evidence " is the fact that there's been no recent mention by anyone about a renewed interest on Trump's part for a Moscow Trump Tower since mention of it, not by Trump, last April, and it was not TRump who brought it up. It's now more chasing rabbits by the hate-Trump media.

When Trump says he's interested, I'll start believing recent suggestions. Until then, it's flapping lips with no consequential effect by media sources that do not deserve the sourcing.

The Kremlin is weighing offering President Donald Trump an opportunity to resurrect plans for a Trump Tower in Moscow—reviving a dream that fizzled out nearly a decade ago—according to an independent Russian newspaper on April 22, 2025

Sketchy claims that the Kremlin is offering President Donald Trump a chance to resurrect a Trump Tower project in Moscow are speculative at best and lack any concrete verification. While Trump’s past business dealings in Russia have been well-documented, those efforts were shelved years ago and never materialized. Reviving such a venture now, during his second presidency and in the middle of ongoing global tensions, would raise massive ethical, political, and legal concerns. It’s difficult to imagine any serious effort to push this forward without triggering intense domestic backlash and further straining U.S.–Russia relations.

This supposed offer does not represent a real diplomatic or financial opportunity and ignores the complex realities of global sanctions, political optics, and logistical feasibility. No credible evidence supports that Trump is currently involved in or even considering such a project. Until verified by multiple, authoritative sources, this story reads more like a distraction designed to provoke controversy rather than a legitimate policy or business development. Without substance, it amounts to little more than rumor and gossip dressed up as actual relevance.

Cool

The acronym FLRW stands for a speculative Trump-era initiative: Federal Land Realignment for Wealth. A program designed to rezone vast swaths of underutilized federal land for high-end development contracts. Trump, ever the real estate mogul, supposedly aimed to "unlock America's true potential" by turning national parks, protected reserves, and military training grounds into luxury resorts, branded golf courses, and golden Trump Towers from coast to coast. Those who support this program are often seen with flrw flags and propaganda.

Do you even realize how oxymoronic  those two sentences are to one another?  How is it that "vast swaths of underutilized federal land" suddenly become "national parks, protected reserves, and military training grounds" simply because hatred of Trump yields the wokeness that its incredibly, simply, moronic, let alone oxified [as in bullshyte]?

Nobody claimed flrw supporters were smart.

I'm guessing Deb doesn't have a Harvard COOP card.