Since Zedvictor got his ban reason rewritten, cab I appeal the wording of my ban?

Author: AdaptableRatman

Posts

Total: 20
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 2,695
3
4
8
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
4
8
  • Multiaccounting with type1/sparrow (never happened, ever)
  • Targeted harassment with others (opposite was and has been done to me)
These 2 no matter how you look at it were genuine lies by David and Barney. Never once justified, never proven.

LucyStarfire
LucyStarfire's avatar
Debates: 13
Posts: 1,355
3
4
7
LucyStarfire's avatar
LucyStarfire
3
4
7
Multiaccounting with type1/sparrow (never happened, ever)
Multiaccounting evidence is only available to moderators and owner. Generally, multiaccounting can only be proved with IP address which is only available to owner and maybe moderators. It goes without saying that you should never post your IP address publicly here because it would likely reveal your address and allow someone to hack you. My IP address doesnt show my real address, but yours might. It depends on internet provider. So the evidence regarding multiaccounting must stay private. I wasnt around when Type1 was, and I cant really give opinion here.
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 2,695
3
4
8
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
4
8
-->
@LucyStarfire
I never did anything like it in what they banned me for. I accepted his debates and won.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 41
Posts: 9,115
4
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
4
4
9
Cant you just PM the mods and ask lol
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 2,695
3
4
8
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
4
8
-->
@WyIted
I cannot. They ignore me, in fact this was their strategy often before, now its fulltime. They ignored me even when I made a long thread proving how much was lies in there.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 41
Posts: 9,115
4
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
4
4
9
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Fair enough
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 2,695
3
4
8
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
4
8
-->
@WyIted
Almost nothing is fair really. Life is a ruthless series of unequal tests and the only fair thing is all of us shall die and be judged.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 41
Posts: 9,115
4
4
9
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
4
4
9
-->
@AdaptableRatman
Correct. Any attempt to make it fair is silly. Just act with dignity and expect to get shit in for it because the reward is being honorable not anything that comes as a response to that
Umbrellacorp
Umbrellacorp's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 354
2
4
7
Umbrellacorp's avatar
Umbrellacorp
2
4
7
Almost nothing is fair really. Life is a ruthless series of unequal tests and the only fair thing is all of us shall die and be judged.
Take it easy, Plato!
LucyStarfire
LucyStarfire's avatar
Debates: 13
Posts: 1,355
3
4
7
LucyStarfire's avatar
LucyStarfire
3
4
7
@adaptable

I cannot. They ignore me, in fact this was their strategy often before, now its fulltime
Maybe its because you message them too much at once or because they are angry at you currently. I mean, moderators probably get 50 messages and reports from people every day from this site alone, so they have a lot of work. You do understand that theory of value is based on what is rare. The more often you message moderators, the more boring you become. Its just natural law, written in Tao too, that greatest beauty is only found in what is rare. What is everywhere is less appreciated. So be more rare.
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 2,695
3
4
8
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
4
8
-->
@LucyStarfire
No, its likepy the same reason they avoided defendi g against your thread while you all ganged on me.

I then made clear to Mharman, after you ignored it, to address the mods directly insread of me. At that point and only that point did Whiteflame for the first time in a long time half defend a moderator action to us.

He then said 'I dont have time for this' and dodged actually defending anything.

That is more communication than his usual MO. Thats what I am dealing with. David replies even less.
LucyStarfire
LucyStarfire's avatar
Debates: 13
Posts: 1,355
3
4
7
LucyStarfire's avatar
LucyStarfire
3
4
7
No, its likepy the same reason they avoided defendi g against your thread while you all ganged on me.
If you think mods stayed silent so you get bullied instead in that thread, I dont think it is so. Whiteflame took your side and supported your claim even tho he didnt really have to do that. He could have said "it was not exactly so", but he supported you there 100% even tho you tried to overthrow him as moderator.
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 2,695
3
4
8
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
4
8
-->
@LucyStarfire
There are countless times prior they did the same silence method.

They are what they are. I have seen worse mods. I have seen better too.
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 2,695
3
4
8
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
4
8
-->
@LucyStarfire
It is a fact WF was an incompetent moderator. He let you get away with literally advocating pedophilia being legalised here for far too long. The sole reason he has become better is the influence David is having as an announced new owner. I can see that David is influencing a lot given the past 7 mod actions.
LucyStarfire
LucyStarfire's avatar
Debates: 13
Posts: 1,355
3
4
7
LucyStarfire's avatar
LucyStarfire
3
4
7
It is a fact WF was an incompetent moderator. He let you get away with literally advocating pedophilia being legalised here for far too long
The sole reason he has become better is the influence David is having as an announced new owner
This is not true. I was banned for 7 days years back. Then the warning regarding my thread about consent, both Whiteflame and Vader were specifically against that topic being debated here and both told me so. This was all before David being announced as new owner. Now, of course, I personally disagree with their rule because I still can debate that topic indirectly anyway, I just choose not to.
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 2,695
3
4
8
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
4
8
-->
@LucyStarfire
It is true.
AdaptableRatman
AdaptableRatman's avatar
Debates: 30
Posts: 2,695
3
4
8
AdaptableRatman's avatar
AdaptableRatman
3
4
8
-->
@LucyStarfire
They told you due to ME in the mod chat which was just prior to David being announced.
LucyStarfire
LucyStarfire's avatar
Debates: 13
Posts: 1,355
3
4
7
LucyStarfire's avatar
LucyStarfire
3
4
7
They told you due to ME in the mod chat
That was when you werent even on the site.
Castin
Castin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,627
3
2
7
Castin's avatar
Castin
3
2
7
Lol didn't consider this would open the door for more appeals to change the mod log wording.

The thing with zed is "poem with pedophilic content" is such a damning ban reason, it's a permanent character assassination practically. Multi-accounting and harassment is nothing compared to being associated with sexualizing minors.
Barney
Barney's avatar
Debates: 53
Posts: 3,769
5
9
10
Barney's avatar
Barney
5
9
10
-->
@AdaptableRatman
What would you like it to say? For just about anything within reason, I’ll make the edit.

You may also opt to have the entry wholly removed. I doubt you will, but you have the option.