Unbeatable argument? (Social transitioning at young age)

So I was on modern day debate, and generally, people seem to be either ignoring comments either unable to respond to my argument.

So argument is made out of two parts.

Premise 1:

This claim is true, because opposite claim is absurd. We cannot say that parents always own their children, since that would allow unspeakable crimes. We also cannot say that parents sometimes own their children, because who gets to decide what sometimes is? Government doesnt own children either, neither does society. So there is no one who can decide this.

Premise 2.

Opposite of this premise is impossible, as if no one owns children, the only thing thats left is that child owns himself, either as current self or future adult.

Now, social transitioning accomplishes both current wants and future wants, as over 99% of trans adults agree with social transition as children.

The only response I got from modern day debate is that children cant be allowed to make decisions, because children are dumb and cant be allowed to smoke and do other stuff.

However, this was just a bad strawman of my argument.

First, social transition is not nearly as harmful as smoking, so the mere comparison is illogical.

Second, smoking is generally regretted. Social transitioning as child is not regretted. In fact, it is regretted to not allow social transition as child.

So the argument is very much unchallenged.

Here is my version of what happened. I didnt remember everything they said because like 5 people talked at same time at one point.

Can you make it so it shows my comments? Because only like 1 claim from my comments was mentioned.

I don't think so now. The room or channel is gone. I don't see it. If you would of let me know earlier, I could have screen recorded all the comments.

But we read some of your comments and that is the recording of the audio to the video that will be uploaded. 

Alright, but they only read 1 claim from the argument. They said I need to get a mic. I do have mic on my phone and laptop, I just cant talk due to my speech disorder, so thats not an option.

No, you mentioned at start that I wont be talking using voice, but they all seem to ignore comments. They are much more interested in people who talk.

It's just more of a task trying to keep up with the comments. I tried. I think I was doing most of the reading.

Then the room starting growing more than the others. 

This is sort of like claiming “Museums don’t own their artifacts. This is true because otherwise, a museum could theoretically be allowed to destroy an artifact, and we know that isn’t the case.” But museums do have a sort of ownership of their artifacts. Similarly, pet owners… own their pets. This doesn’t mean they can do whatever they want with them legally.

These legal relationships are more accurately described by the phrase “have custody of.” Museums have custody of their artifacts; pet owners have custody of their pets; and parents have custody of their children.

The ownership is considered as having ability to decide about something. Shared ownership was already a defeated argument, as well as partial ownership.

“have custody of”

If you dont want to attack an argument, that is fine.

Again, thats just strawman. Government doesnt own kids, and parents dont own kids, so likewise, the two cannot have shared ownership either.

“parents have custody of their children.”

Irrelevant to my argument. You either can impose your decision on children or you cant. There is no 3rd option, and "sometimes can" was already defeated argument.

Custody

To put it more simply, there is no person who can morally always impose decisions on child. And the reason why "sometimes can impose" doesnt work either is because the requirement for someone to be able to decide what "sometimes" is already assumes that person can always impose decisions, which is morally not allowed.

You dont get it, thats okay.

Your argument can be owned; that’s for sure.

If you dont want to debate, fine. I dont think you even understood the given argument.

I’m sure this will explain everything:

If you want to run away from debate, fine. Its your style.

Similarly, just because I have owned you, that does not mean that I can legally stop you from claiming to anyone who will listen that your argument is unassailable.

Definitively speaking a parent owns a child, just as a child owns a parent.

Though like a lot of words, own has variable interpretations and connotations.

You would perhaps say that you own your chickens.

Whereas chickens probably don't conceptualise notions such as ownership.

The ownership in this case is clearly defined as opposite of "the decisions affecting child must be in the interest of child's wants, either as current or future self."

But again, you have to understand the argument to attack it.

Lucy, my pfp is how your future self looks.

Nice lead up.  ;-/. Unable indeed.he 

You must have been abused. SINCE you must have not belonged to your parents you sought the attention you craved and we denied by loser generations like my parents and their parents having a pime female factor that is humiliating to observe. The idea of being told things arbitrarily changed into another without any votes or reason BUT reason being the financially commited state that destroyed families and payed the mothered 1k per kid per month and could have them work also without any consequences. You see, in planning to steal the rights of all the people's an alliance is made with our women's and the society collapses and the band snaps back. You may or may not resemble the strange mutations and mottled models of campus Waterloo or UWL. I passer byed on the train and my bitten tongue was so confused. 20 years ago they started the letter wars, and I didn't get it. The gay community was trannie bar flies and queers that partied with everyone. What happened in a generation is 🤣🤣😧😧 nuclear. Eu to Eww -genics. 🤢 Mottled was generously used for all skin, when it comes from a nose condition of old men. It was accepted smallpox or worse. Toxicity in the city. This is not an argument. Hi Aids in Canada. Used to be LA only. Or Africa but that had nothing to do with sodomy. In youth there is a nonsense about much. But after you corrupt the child, it's wasted. You broke at the scene. Masturbation is not ok, it's one of the factors of the home destruction. Also Families are A marriage that produces children and, by extension, the extended family is the in law's and etc.

so the union of sterility is paid to learn about the child and the child's best interests by any homosexual standard is not going to speak the best for the child. The homosexual is a narcissist by design. He is not a good role model for anything but may be a good dad either way. If the bond develops without an attraction, or compulsion, then the child is not subjective to unwanted advances.

It is my strong opinionated position that the lies of statistics are easily exposed and I formally request all such frauds and pergury make no more attempts. I am aware that you must crush the population and make sex trolls our of your enemies children especially when the timeline has produced such fruits of rotting poison. Such foul nectar and sterile in all regards. The idea of monkey pox and horrific conditions being 'accepted' as teenage acne is imposed. A laugh, and a laugh in the face of you all. You are getting beaten by nature. See, not only is your reproductive development robbing you of future life, you still needed to get smallpox and aids while in school and that goes to show the sexual activity this pack of monsters endured was a lifetimes worth in Adult prostitution. Whatever you do, do it right even if it's wrong. HA. I miss my fag friends and don't care about this dumb kids deficiency. His parents suck. 😂 Such loving parents....so cool and accepting.

The thing is, Parents usually don't care or think enough to care, the mother is worst of all usually....I'm my family. But it flipped. lost one sister though but she had a bf and a kid first. Then my pos mother kicked her out for no reason, she went to shelter with like no skills, her pos brother didn't help, that's me too but I did I stuck up for her and for 10 years I've condemned her Dad for choosing mum cause he's emaciated and poos in a bucket where he drinks AND SLEEPS all day. She lost 3 houses and just fell apart. The child support money for us kids stopped and all of a sudden they sell one house, worth way more for a lot, but bought a lemon with new appliances that they had to sell in a few years. that's a lot of money. A millions? And now she is with me in the basement. She gets money from the government which she spends and steals and tries getting me arrested in my own house so she can take over. I one hundred AND 10 percent have heard of AND thought very little about the matricide. It's rare but does occur. This generation of boss lady lost money makes for very conscious ABUSERS and the fact is, my mother is such an abuser she would, if nueder or gender neutral AKA fair AND equal before the courts have gone for 1,  2  then five then more years in jail. She's not a candidate for your courts and this pogrom of men. Myself, my son, women were the best in our lives. My mother was not that or a mother. Monster mommy is a real thing I hear my daughter call my ex from afar while carrying her. 

While you fail to comprehend you were made, not born, thus you endure and know nothing more. You are just fine. Don't feel bad or shame, what chance had you. Group meeting, elevated cool guy status, attention from dad at last.....well. maybe you would be a good foster parent. Lesbians do not