Why good God allows evil

Author: UltimateTrueKorea

Posts

Total: 9
UltimateTrueKorea
UltimateTrueKorea's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 106
0
1
2
UltimateTrueKorea's avatar
UltimateTrueKorea
0
1
2
P1. Doing good to someone requires fulfilling their need when they themselves cant fulfill it.
P2. Evil means someone has a need which isnt fulfilled
P3. "Fulfilling someone's need" requires that someone has a need which isnt fulfilled
P4. "Fulfilling someone's need" requires existence of evil
P5. Doing good to someone requires fulfilling someone's need, thus requires existence of evil.

Consider this scenario. If no one needed any money, you wouldnt be able to help anyone financially. If no one needed food, you wouldnt be able to feed anyone. If no one was in lack of love, you wouldnt be able to give love to anyone.

this remains true, that a lack of good is a condition for good to be provided in the first place. If God provided all good to all, no person could provide good to each other because no one would need any good from each other.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,762
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@UltimateTrueKorea
You are describing heaven where no one needs good from each other. There is already an abundance of good in heaven.

13 days later

SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,732
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@UltimateTrueKorea
P1. No, it doesn't 
P2. Thats not valid
P3. Not necessarily.
P4. No, it doesn't 
P5. Just...no.

Good=/=fulfillment of needs

UltimateTrueKorea
UltimateTrueKorea's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 106
0
1
2
UltimateTrueKorea's avatar
UltimateTrueKorea
0
1
2
-->
@SkepticalOne
wrong
SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,732
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@UltimateTrueKorea
wrong
A need is a fundamental requirement for survival. A morally good act can be something like 'fair play'. No one *needs* fair play, but it is good nonetheless.  Again, good is not the same thing as 'fulfillment of needs' .  You seriously need to re-evaulaute the premises you are using to support your conclusion because it is hanging out there in open air with no support. 


Tl;dr - OP premises do not lead to OP conclusion.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,762
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@SkepticalOne
Your karma is shaped by your actions.
SkepticalOne
SkepticalOne's avatar
Debates: 9
Posts: 1,732
3
3
7
SkepticalOne's avatar
SkepticalOne
3
3
7
-->
@Shila
Your karma is shaped by your actions.
I'm not convinced of that claim. There are too many evil people in powerful positions for me to accept karma is a real and significant factor in reality. 
UltimateTrueKorea
UltimateTrueKorea's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 106
0
1
2
UltimateTrueKorea's avatar
UltimateTrueKorea
0
1
2
-->
@SkepticalOne
A need is a fundamental requirement for survival. A morally good act can be something like 'fair play'. No one *needs* fair play, but it is good nonetheless.  Again, good is not the same thing as 'fulfillment of needs' .  You seriously need to re-evaulaute the premises you are using to support your conclusion because it is hanging out there in open air with no support. 

Incorrect again.
Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 8,762
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@SkepticalOne
Two examples come to mind. Trump was re-elected, Elon Musk was rewarded with success. The downside to Karma, Jesus was crucified.