I've cited my short-list of racial hatred/disenfranchisement of White people. White on White aggression is certainly a problem, but again, I've cited instances wherein it's not. The White, male heterosexual problem is another problem that White people face, not the only one. Maybe this differs for the countries in which you live, but in countries like the U.S, Australia and the U.K, my claims are valid.
- Forget links & lists. Why don't you make your case, in a progression of ideas. Conceptualize the issue & articulate it in a structured manner. & start by defining your terminology, 'White people', 'racial hatred'..etc. Maybe this way we can reach an understanding.
Yes, Colonialism and the other things that Whites did to conquer. Some Whites have become racially impartial, due to charges of racism, wanting to be individualistic, virtue-signalling etc.
- I think it had more to do with attaining almost self-annihilation from being too racially partial.
Racism is a bogus term. Oppression is debatable, although there will be instances of it (but Whites have been the kindest out of any rulers, thus far).
- I don't know if this is due to ignorance of history, but of course that's far from reality. It's very hard to find, throughout history, a more ruthless & destructive peoples than Europeans, even to their own kind. The Mongols may have been more ruthless, though much less effective. "Thus far" as compared to who? The thing about relying on these sources that you follow is that there are no opponents who fight back -it's like hitting a dummy & it doesn't hit back, that doesn't mean you're strong & you won-, or that you're right & you won. According to the Encyclopedia of War, the death toll instigated by Europeans throughout history is greater than by the rest combined...
Yeah I guess it's that. I'm going to have at least six children, too :)
- That's the spirit ;-). If every White person did the same, all problems solved. Unfortunately, they are too "free" & too "equal" for this, it's "beneath" them.
Injustice isn't stating the problems of my racial group. They can be addressed and fixed without having to mention other racial groups.
- Then I must have gotten the wrong impression, for you keep mentioning Blacks & Hispanics (& Muslims) as the source of these problems. How do you address these problems then?
Can you prove that neither of those conflicts are ethnic, at least not partially?
- It was meant to be one country, but politics changed that. Much of the borders in-between separate same ethnic groups (such as the Punjabis & the Kashmiris) between Pakistan & India. Both countries speak the same main language (Urdu=Hindi) -along others. Both share the same history & culture. The conflict started as a political one (with parliament elections), which turned into a polico-religious conflict between the Hindus & the Muslims ending in several wars, & separation in 71. This type of situation is very common among most colonized countries, as intended by the colonial powers, divide & conquer.
What you describe for Australia is a pipe-dream. What actually happens is that people naturally balkanise. They're not bad people per se. They're just tribalistic. For example, an area near me called Lakemba has a high Muslim majority (over 60%, much more than Australia's low like 2% off the top of my head: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakemba,_New_South_Wales). The place is full of Arabic, Halal and has a big Mosque. Clearly, this place doesn't serve most White people. This is not an integrated community. This is natural segregation. I could do it with like Cabramatta and Chatswood (Asian areas).
- This is like the ethnic enclaves in New York (like Chinatown, Little India, Little Italy...). Indeed, why is this bad? Even further, if each community had their own rules & local government, to create an organic pluralist society.
If it's well documented and recorded, cough up the evidence, champ.
- Maybe another time. I'm too lazy to go look for sources.
The Holocaust is a nuanced topic that I frankly don't have the time to discuss here. What I can say is that the public narrative isn't all that accurate, and Hilter engaged in whatever he engaged in because he thought the Jews were too smart for Germans.
- Oooh! Do you believe that the Holocaust happened? This wasn't exclusive to Hitler, it was the natural European reaction once nationalism & racism coupled with very isolated & powerful Jews took root in the society ; others just had different solutions. Hitler sought to "purify" them, while the Russians just besieged them into pogroms & left them to their own vices to perish slowly, & the Brits opted to expel them somewhere outside Europe (Balfour declaration, to the British Mandate of Palestine).