-->
@Mopac
Perfecto. So why are you trying to communicate this "experience" with words?The faith is not rational apprehension, it is experience.
It would seem to be an exercise in futility.
Perfecto. So why are you trying to communicate this "experience" with words?The faith is not rational apprehension, it is experience.
What do you think we are to this platform?a prime, eternal consciousness
Why?I'm an irreligious theist. I believe that a prime, eternal consciousness created the universe.
I'm an irreligious theist. I believe that a prime, eternal consciousness created the universe.
I'm an irreligious theist. I believe that a prime, eternal consciousness created the universe. The universe having an origin from consciousness is the best explanation of what caused the Big Bang, the fine-tunedness of the universe, among other things.
I cannot have a relationship with a being that I cannot confirm the existence of. The next move, it would seem, is god's (if such a being even exists).
I'm an irreligious theist. I believe that a prime, eternal consciousness created the universe.
The universe having an origin from consciousness is the best explanation of what caused the Big Bang, the fine-tunedness of the universe, among other things.
The "fine-tuned universe" is widely accepted by mainstream physicists and cosmologists.
The "argument from fine-tuning" argues that God is the best explanation for the fine-tuned universe. I agree with both.
One question are you a physicist or cosmologist?
No, I consider myself a theist because I believe moral realism and moral realism entails the existence of a theistic God.