Trump Fake News

your words don't actually no real meaning to me.

At llesst you admit you have comprehension issues. You should now adapt an attitude of humility that is consistent with the knowledge that you have comprehension issues. 

I know that you hate Christians for no good reason, but what does that have to di with the subject?

This is about illegal immigration.

This is what happens when you don't let Trump build the wall.

Please build the wall, I like a avocados.

The reason Donald Trump is threatening my avocado addiction is because politicians that you probably like don't want to do anything about the illegal immigration problem. 

Donald Trump said build a wall, which of course would stop an awful lot of illegal crossings, and then reform the immigration process so thst people can get here legally.

For all your talk of "rationality" I don't see in your approach to converse with me a single shred of it. It seems to me that you are simply insulting my character and declaring your own ignorance to be a lack of evidence.

Way to shut the conversation down.

Jesus Christ loves you.

Nah, you aren't going to listen anyway. You are obviously very passionate.

Please, tell me more about how reasonable you are.

Trump lost most of his wealth in the last 2 years because he stopped focusing on his business and traded in his equity on his name recognition to run the country.

The OP gives no proof of why economists think imposing tariffs are not a good idea

The OP had to look up Chuck Schumer to find out who he was.  Anyone that has to do that shouldn't really have an opinion on anything political.

but the fact is China will hurt more than we would on both ends of the spectrum.

Probably 50% of everything you use.... and most are things that we can definitely find elsewhere, usually little pieces of crap. 

There would be a few businesses hurt, the technology world would be hurt pretty bad (in my opinion, needs to slow down a bit anyway), and there may be fewer fireworks in the sky come July.  It sucks for these businesses in the short run, but once China realizes the importance of the need to trade with us, they will fold, and all will not only go back to normal, but it will be better than the past.   

On another note, The OP had to look up Chuck Schumer to find out who he was.  Anyone that has to do that shouldn't really have an opinion on anything political.

They say whether or not they agree with tarifs in general, but they also imply that the questions asked is specifically about Trumps plan.

A misinterpretation of the facts to give people like you ammunition.

This is kind of fake news, that is what you are falling for when reading these articles.

It is misleading to the core, from the title, in the subject, it does mention in general, but you are supposed to look over that, and they expect you to.  Read it again and get back to me.

What are you going on about Mr. Omar?  I'm merely pointing out the fact that the article you cited is misleading.  It is not proof of anything.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/12/23/100-of-economists-asked-said-import-tariffs-were-not-a-good-idea/#701ebc0d58c7

Yes, tariffs can hurt the economy, all economists will agree on that, that is established.  But do they agree with what Trump is doing, and do they have all the facts, is the question?   We don't need an article written about a generalized statement, which the article that you attached says it is right in the body of it.  Articles like these are the reason people don't like Trump, because they mislead the public into thinking what he is doing is detriment to the country.  And they call Trump voters uneducated, and drinking the kool aid.  

You cited this article to say that Trump is wrong on imposing taxes, yet, someone else cited an article where Trump's arch nemises, who has opposed him in every possible policy, actually agrees with him, and then you ask... Who is he?

I don't need evidence to prove that this article is misleading, just read it again.

That is like writing an article about how 100% of people believe that killing people is wrong.  Then taking that article as proof that 100% of people  think Capital Punishment is wrong.  Do you see the comparison?

Trump is using tariffs in a different way than past Tariffs are used.  He used it on Mexico as a threat, which is the first time any President has used them to negotiate an immigration problem.  And he is using it on China to end the intellectual property theft, as well as evening out the playing field in other aspects.  

You explained the difference between murdering people and the death penalty, which I moved it around and called it killing someone, which is the whole misleading aspect of my comparison, they don't mean the same thing, yet you think that they do, which is why you have fallen for the article, and why you believe Trump is an evil person because you don't see the way the article is misleading.  I can't explain it any more than I already have.  You are a lost cause.

Let me give you another example of a misleading article that I read.  

There was an article that blamed Trump for the interest rates hiking, which at 19 years old, you would know nothing about.  Anyway, they implied that the interest rates going up is a bad thing, when in actuality, it is not.  It is a sign of a very strong economy and things are going well for the time being, so the Fed decides to hike the rates up in order to balance multiple things out.  The editor made it seem to people that do not understand this, which would be people like you, that Americans will now have to spend more money on interest, all because Trump doesn't know what he is doing, which couldn't be further from the truth.

BTW, Chuck Schumer is a United States Senator and the Senate Minority leader, and it is his job to care about these things.... He knows more about the country than any regular old economist does.  I disagree with him on most of his agenda, but this one, smart people can agree on.  You would rather us go to war on China, or impose sanctions, which also can lead to war.  Tariffs on the other hand probably won't lead to war, which is very smart for Trump to take this action to avoid lives being lost.  It also may backfire, but we shall see.

I would not be surprised at all to see Omar to agree with an economist that we should disband the military because 100% of economists agree that the military is a drain on the economy.