How to find reliable sources?

Author: Dr.Franklin

Posts

Total: 108
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@PressF4Respect
I see, did you care to ask how I know they are real?

Of course it is a conspiracy theory, they are conspiring to remain in charge for millennia and if/when they cure ageing, they will literally do that, not even needing elitist bloodlines to rule but the actual same people (and for all we know, they already have achieved immortality because the true heads of it are not the ones that even the conspiracy theorists reveal as the leaders, you can climb up as far as the second band of the elite by getting rich and socialising with other rich and powerful people but you never get to the true top without being a very, very vetted and chosen one by your bloodline, friends you knew from birth etc. If they can't track you from birth, they never let you join the top-end of them (we're talking people who run UN, I am speaking of people running it, not ranking high in it, the high rankers serve them, they may not be human).
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@PressF4Respect
I have no issue of explaining it up to a certain point. Past a certain point I will stop because if I prove things in a tangible manner, that is when I must fear for my life. I will never go that far to fully prove something about them in any concrete way but it's there.
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@PressF4Respect
Just ask him for evidence. If he can't then it wouldn't be something new. No point entertaining the thought when you can spend your time on something more positive as in something helpful to your health or your happiness. Basically watch pr0n, go to the doctor or something other things like or make you healthy instead of spending time on RM's cold takes. 

PressF4Respect
PressF4Respect's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 3,159
3
8
11
PressF4Respect's avatar
PressF4Respect
3
8
11
-->
@RationalMadman
Of course it is a conspiracy theory, they are conspiring to remain in charge for millennia and if/when they cure ageing, they will literally do that, not even needing elitist bloodlines to rule but the actual same people (and for all we know, they already have achieved immortality because the true heads of it are not the ones that even the conspiracy theorists reveal as the leaders, you can climb up as far as the second band of the elite by getting rich and socialising with other rich and powerful people but you never get to the true top without being a very, very vetted and chosen one by your bloodline, friends you knew from birth etc. If they can't track you from birth, they never let you join the top-end of them (we're talking people who run UN, I am speaking of people running it, not ranking high in it, the high rankers serve them, they may not be human).
That statement is as ridiculousness as saying that NASA faked the moon landing. 


PressF4Respect
PressF4Respect's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 3,159
3
8
11
PressF4Respect's avatar
PressF4Respect
3
8
11
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Past a certain point I will stop because if I prove things in a tangible manner, that is when I must fear for my life. I will never go that far to fully prove something about them in any concrete way but it's there.
He basically already admitted to having no evidence whatsoever.

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@PressF4Respect
Actually my statement is more ridiculous than that. NASA did fake the moon landing, even if the Earth is Round. Many experts on video analysis and cinematography have explained that there's many elements of the filming that completely and utterly indicate it's being done in a studio environment with harnesses. 

The moon landing being faked is something I'll happily go into fully, because they don't care about people realising that unless I somehow influenced too many people but even then I wouldn't be blamed for it, they'd blame the ones who designed and faked it.
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
@RM

Past a certain point I will stop because if I prove things in a tangible manner, that is when I must fear for my life. I will never go that far to fully prove something about them in any concrete way but it's there.
Someone cares about you that much and are waiting for you to post something about them to do something about you? I find that difficult believe because for one if you were so important you wouldn't be on this site instead I think you would  try your best to hide from them not make your presence known to the public. Another problem is that if your convincing argument is locked behind a fear wall then don't expect people to believe it. You are not gaining anything by saying this. Unless you want attention. Up until that last sentence I was using the most simplest observations but I couldn't help myself given I think it is the most likely. 
PressF4Respect
PressF4Respect's avatar
Debates: 10
Posts: 3,159
3
8
11
PressF4Respect's avatar
PressF4Respect
3
8
11
-->
@RationalMadman
If you actually believe in what you say about the moon landings, message me in PMs. 
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@PressF4Respect
He basically already admitted to having no evidence whatsoever.
You moved one step closer because when I tried to ask him to present evidence he kept on telling me more stuff that required evidence. 

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
I was asked something about what I believe, attention was already given. I obliged, would you rather I ignored him and played normal?
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
@RM

I was asked something about what I believe, attention was already given. I obliged, would you rather I ignored him and played normal?
Lack of evidence based beliefs leads to other beliefs not held to a higher standard. (fecking up the quote but I don't care)

You subscribe to Paganism while also believing in the Illuminati. Doubtful this is a coincidence. There can be more examples but I don't want to try too much. 
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
Paganism as opposed to what? You think other religions involve less as opposed to more sheepthink? You are a good laugh, Omar.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
Where is your evidence for who runs the world? Who makes money worth anything? Do you know who they are? Really, who?

I am talking about the people who make it so that laws are laws, the people who make it so that 'reliable sources' are 'reliable'. Who are they?
TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
@RM
Paganism as opposed to what? You think other religions involve less as opposed to more sheepthink? You are a good laugh, Omar.
How about choosing no Religion? I don't know like agnosticism or atheism oh wait you have really irrational takes on atheists. What is Ramshutu an atheist therefore atheism bad?
Where is your evidence for who runs the world? Who makes money worth anything? Do you know who they are? Really, who?
Pushing the burden of proof. Obvious tactic of a person who can't actually defend his side instead tries the most he can to shift the burden to me as if I ma the one making a claim. I didn't make a claim. You did. Going to support it or going to what you did when you accuse bsh1?
I am talking about the people who make it so that laws are laws, the people who make it so that 'reliable sources' are 'reliable'. Who are they?
Not going to answer a question you can't. 
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
I don't have any idea why you think that I am not atheist because Ramshutu is but clearly you think I was born and developed opinions only after I met Ramshutu, which is just flat out ridiculous.

My accusations against Bsh1 are all backed up, every single one. You don't know what you are talking about and just want me to feel shit.

15 days later

Christen
Christen's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 332
1
4
7
Christen's avatar
Christen
1
4
7
How to find reliable sources?
google
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 22
Posts: 11,269
3
3
6
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
6
-->
@RationalMadman
@Christen
Reliable is what you want reliable to be.

Reliability and accuracy are worthless if they do not agree with a conditioned mindset.
Christen
Christen's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 332
1
4
7
Christen's avatar
Christen
1
4
7
Yeah, what zedvictor4 said