-->
@Cogent_Cognizer
Perhaps you should explain why it would be detrimental to town to not have you anymore rather than defend yourself desperately
You realize how stupid you sound right now?
Why are you even on my wagon?
Perhaps you should explain why it would be detrimental to town to not have you anymore rather than defend yourself desperately
Keep up this questioning of me. It will make the others think we aren't scum
My read is you and stop dodging my questions and I'll answer yours
It's neither poor logic nor is it opportunistic. I was literally just scum with you where you made a shitty push on wylted for what you seemed to think would be an easy lynch, and now you were trying to push a policy lynch on club for all of day 1 without even attempting to hunt. That is not poor logic. You're looking for an easy lynch.
Also Pie please point me toward your water thing because I don't remember a damn bit of it
1. No, I was trying to help pressure2. Wylted asked for a claim3. Disc didn't scumread me4. What?
You can't just throw around words like "clearly" and expect them to have meaning. It seems multiple other people agree with me. So no, it's not clear.
As far as club's claim, yes, I'd still be on you because as I hinted at above, I don't think you were actively searching for alternatives. You were, on the other hand, actively trying to agree to your contingency plan, which makes me feel as though it wasn't really a contingency plan.
Nothing in 282 is even remotely convincing. You're flippantly tossing big words or phrases that seem smart like "cognitive dissonance" into your posts and clearly don't have any grasp of what they mean. Cognitive dissonance is "the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioral decisions and attitude change."You're using "parallelism" and "cognitive dissonance" to describe the same thing when they aren't similar in the slightest.Also, you've failed to give any convincing reason why any of that's inherently scummy. This push honestly might be worse than the one on club. Not only does my vote stand, but your "case" on water made me even more confident that you have done nothing pro-town yet.
Your vote from me comes cause a “revealed” a mason, when you wouldn’t be making the same case if he claimed Vanilla. It’s poor logic and hella opportunistic.