lower character limits on debates

Author: Trent0405 ,

Posts

Total: 7
Trent0405
Trent0405's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 463
3
9
11
Trent0405's avatar
Trent0405
3
9
11
What are your thoughts on debates with only a few thousand characters a round, this is basically all of my debates but I'm wondering how it's perceived by everybody else.
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 99
Posts: 5,705
7
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
7
10
11
heartsies 

Trent0405
Trent0405's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 463
3
9
11
Trent0405's avatar
Trent0405
3
9
11
--> @oromagi
What? Heartsies is apparently a snack thing and a flower, I'm so confused
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 99
Posts: 5,705
7
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
7
10
11
Heartsies, as in I heart short debates
Trent0405
Trent0405's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 463
3
9
11
Trent0405's avatar
Trent0405
3
9
11
--> @oromagi
Thank you, very happy to here, I can say I thoroughly enjoyed debating Germany and France with a shorter format, it's been the only debate where my opinion was changed.
Ragnar
Ragnar's avatar
Debates: 36
Posts: 1,917
5
9
10
Ragnar's avatar
Ragnar
5
9
10
--> @Trent0405
Less is more.

Even 10K debates are too long for most voters, I honestly suspect the default would be more optimal around 5 or 6K (I should note that it used to be 30K, so 10K is a good number).

While trimming our arguments can be annoying, it also helps us grow in skill by forcing us to shed the fat which doesn't support the resolution. I sometimes set a goal for only using half the characters my opponent uses.

So in essence, I heartsies shorter debates.
Dr.Franklin
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Debates: 32
Posts: 9,387
4
7
11
Dr.Franklin's avatar
Dr.Franklin
4
7
11
I think 15k would be a good size