NSFW: One sick and twisted question that will categorically ascertain your true wing leanings.

Author: RationalMadman

Posts

Total: 56
blamonkey
blamonkey's avatar
Debates: 24
Posts: 532
3
5
8
blamonkey's avatar
blamonkey
3
5
8
-->
@RationalMadman
I wouldn't take the result to seriously. No test is 100% accurate, and you definitely don't come off as a right wing authoritarian.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@blamonkey
I am a better chameleon than you are then, friend. ;)
dustryder
dustryder's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 1,080
3
2
4
dustryder's avatar
dustryder
3
2
4
-->
@Greyparrot
Inequality is built into our DNA. There is only one systemic cure for that.
Genocide?

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@dustryder
What was your result?
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Greyparrot
Actually your result is authoritarian right winger. Your 6 was not what the Libertarian has it as in their results vs where you had it. Where you had '3' is where for your results to pan out, you'd need '6' a the very end.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
In my results:

RM: Centrist/Chameleon who leans to Fascism.
Blamonkey: Centrist/Chameleon who leans to Libertarian Socialism

If I transcribe Paul's stated stances he probably is 1+5 at the start, so 6 for stage 1.

Then probably is 8 with 4 seemingly being the ridiculous thing he'd never think of as it's clear he least wants to ignore it and doesn't even process that as an option.

8-4 = 4

6-3=3 so a chameleon who probably leans to lib right and that may fit with his agenda somewhat.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
Dred: lib right-winger
GreyParrot - Auth Right-Winger

Bmd: dictator in denial (I think being in denial is part of that alignment to be honest, as I hinted)



dustryder
dustryder's avatar
Debates: 5
Posts: 1,080
3
2
4
dustryder's avatar
dustryder
3
2
4
-->
@RationalMadman
Ruthless dictator. I think picking the same option for Stage 2 breaks it. Or I could actually be a ruthless dictator 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@dustryder
It's very 'breakable' because there's quite a few ways to have Stage 3 be a negative result, but so far no one at all has had it because I designed it to cover all coherent or legitimate moral codes, tbph. If you have a negative result in Stage 3, you're lying to yourself extremely.
Greyparrot
Greyparrot's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 22,564
3
4
10
Greyparrot's avatar
Greyparrot
3
4
10
-->
@RationalMadman
I scored it like you said. I got a 6 at the end and 6 was something I would never have thought of.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Greyparrot
But theb you put the 6 in the wrong part of the stafe 2 equation. You need ti minus by the 6 in stage 2
Reece101
Reece101's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 1,893
3
2
2
Reece101's avatar
Reece101
3
2
2
-->
@RationalMadman
I’m a libertarian left-winger. Pretty accurate.




RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
no 6-4=2, so PaulVerliane is actually a chameleon who leans to lib left-wing. That makes more sense.

It wasn't 6-3 =3
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@Reece101
GG 
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@bmdrocks21
In PM, if you don't want to to it publicly, pls tell me your results so we are sure the math was done right.

I can't reveal your PM without getting punished for PM doxxing so I am bound by privacy clauses of the CoC.
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@RationalMadman
I think these were my choices:

Would: get cops involved (5)
Want: beat him up without kids seeing (2)
Add:
2 + 5 = 7

Least want: Ignore it(4)
Super immoral: joining in (8)
Subtract latter from former: 4 - 8 = -4

Then subtract the second round from the first:

7 - -4 = 11

Over 8 means I am a dictator.

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@bmdrocks21
Option 2 means you are giving the children up for adoption afterwards, whereas option 1 is doing what you said. Actually it's true in a way, option 1 entails they will hear/see it so I get your reasoning.

Your choices all imply that given power, you would do many things violent and/or corrupt in the name of what you see as worth doing it, especially since option 2 is to be done without witness (for their own good of course, in your eyes at least) you think most like a tin pot dictator. This sounds like a harsh insult, but that's because you are reading it in the tone of someone who is inherently against authority. I am not saying it as an insult or loathing your character. You would likely be a somewhat fair dictator, I don't doubt that. You would, nonetheless, come down like all hell broken loose on those you deemed immoral under your regime and that trait, especially when combined with your subtle means and loathing of neutrality (4 being what least to do) result in you being overall an interventionalist, 'absolute authority' type when given the chance.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@bmdrocks21
Option 5 is more like playing it safe enough and hiding behind them, you'd probably dislike that you had to do it. That's not objectively good or evil, it's just your style of morality.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@bmdrocks21
Also, the fact that joining in was the most absurd thing you could fathom out of all the options shows that you would not cower to influence you saw as corrupt, no matter how much peace depended upon it.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@bmdrocks21
You would not be an imperialist dictator, you are not a right-wing type. You would be an isolationist type overall, attacking your nearby nations only if they were too immoral for you to stand and the authorities wouldn't do it.
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@RationalMadman
I don't disagree with a lot of your reasoning. I do believe that there can be an immoral aspect to doing nothing.

I don't know if I would attack nearby nations for their immoral actions. Since I am rather nationalistic, I would only do that if it somehow prevented harm in my country. 

Why wouldn't I be a right-wing type?
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
Never heard of tin-pot dictator, but I don't appreciate it lol.

TheRealNihilist
TheRealNihilist's avatar
Debates: 44
Posts: 4,920
4
9
11
TheRealNihilist's avatar
TheRealNihilist
4
9
11
-->
@RationalMadman
If the answer is larger than 8, you are a ruthless dictator without wing orientation, you may identify as an anarchic rebel.
Me. The first part I picked the best decision.
The second was subjective so I picked what I felt bad about. 
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@bmdrocks21
A Right-Winger fundamentally thrives on competition, they want inequality. You would try to ignore inequality, you would rule simply as you saw best, be it fitting to the natural order of things or not.
bmdrocks21
bmdrocks21's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 2,798
4
6
11
bmdrocks21's avatar
bmdrocks21
4
6
11
-->
@RationalMadman
Well, there are some limitations to that description because I am not an anarchist. Technically having a police force interferes with the natural order of things, and I support having a police force. Right-wingers don't want inequality, they recognize that, because everyone is different, they will all reach different outcomes. They tend to not want to interfere with that inequality through wealth redistribution and other similar programs. 

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 555
Posts: 19,353
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@bmdrocks21
You are the one who says you're right-wing. I am arguing for my results being true to you.