"The United States National Health Care Act or Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act is a bill first introduced in the United States House of Representatives by former Representative John Conyers "
You linked to the wrong the bill. That is a different health care bill. I believe this is the correct one.
This doesn't disagree with what I said.
Sorry, you wrote "think thanks". I may have misunderstood what you were trying to say.
This is wrong. When he was stating the ACA was a right wing proposal he was talking about how Republicans were for it in the past. When he was talking about the left wing position that the government provides healthcare he was comparing it to other regions.
I'm not sure what you are disagreeing with. The UK has a left wing healthcare system. Medicare for all is a compromise between than and the free market healthcare system. That is what he was saying.
He was saying that Medicare for All was the middle ground between right and left wing proposals.No he didn't.
He literally said medicare for all was the compromise position. Are you disagreeing that he said that?
This is the problem. Instead of actually finding him against medicare for all you are assuming he is.
He released a plan that is not a single payer system. That is not medicare for all. His official campaign position is that american should not have a single payer system. I am not assuming he is against it. His official position is that he isn't for it. His official position a year ago is that he was for it.
I admitted that Bernie hasn't proposed anything socialist but you can't even admit that you have no proof that Pete is against medicare for all.
His campaign policy position isn't proof? I will admit he doesn't make statements where he will directly say he opposes it. But that is more coldly poll tested positioning. He campaigns for a slight modification of the ACA. But if he came out and said he didn't want Medicare for all, he would get roasted for it.
