-->
@ethang5
I think that I was agreeing with you in a round about way. That is if I understood you correctly.
A blames B for A's problems.
A has a tendency to wallow in the past and is fearful for the future.
Glad someone else noticed this too.many conservatives claim to value the free market and the exchange of ideas, but advocate social policies which would further isolate distinct social groups based upon ethnicity, which seems antithetical to an open market.
Can you produce an example of such a policy?...advocate social policies which would further isolate distinct social groups based upon ethnicity,
No. Modern-day progressives advocate for equality of outcomes rather than equality of opportunity.I guess I am asking, in opposition to what? Aren't today's progressives basically arguing for the same thing? I.e. a nation-state founded upon abstract principles of universalism.
...social policies which would further isolate distinct social groups based upon ethnicity,
If you had to choose only one of these outcomes, which would you pick?
- Opening up immigration to allow more people in, or
- Increasing government spending on welfare programs?
No. Modern-day progressives advocate for equality of outcomes rather than equality of opportunity.
Well, the issue is that not many presidents have been super fiscally conservative, except a few like Coolidge. Many lower taxes, but then refuse to lower spending. That is half conservative but completely irresponsible.
Should I take anyone who calls themselves fiscally conservative serious? If no why?
I'd want open borders along with banned welfare and a pie chart method to allow the conservatives to retain power in a country that would be 60% liberal.
But when viewed in comparison with Donnie was Ronnie really that much of a conservative?
Ronald Reagan wasn't very fiscally conservative.
He cut taxes, but also increased a lot of spending
American Presidents have very little control concerning overall spending. Congress does. And Democratic congresses make sure to paint Republican Presidents as "cutting social welfare for the poor" so as to pork up the budget as much as possible.The funny thing is, If Trump cuts the budget, they accuse him of not caring for the poor, and if he increases the budget, they accuse him of not being republican.
Thoughts on it?
No. Modern-day progressives advocate for equality of outcomes rather than equality of opportunity.
Really? An equality of outcomes is a logical impossibility in the real world, and an equality of opportunity is the only fair way to run a society....not a real distinction.