349 Supa "that's how my Google translate said"
352 Supa "I didn't copy and paste from Google translate"
That's a contradiction, VTL SupaDudz
Narcos Mafia DP1
Posts
Total:
544
-->
@Speedrace
Smh, "copy and paste" is different from "read and type". Supa is saying that he did the second thing. You can say he is lying if you want and maybe he is but saying this is a contradiction is silly.
-->
@Bullish
No the implication is that as town, the player would recognize drafter's trap: scum would fall for it an actually post the Spanish for miller, but town would be quick to point out that their role "miller" is in English.DD, why did you not do that.
Thanks for explaining but why you gotta spoil my secrets, yo. This is like when Supa went all bizonkers on my for reaction testing Water in Virt's game.
-->
@Vader
Idek that's how my google translate said
What is the word as it appears in your role PM?
-->
@drafterman
Pueblo which is the people
Many have said there was Pueblo too
-->
@Speedrace
I told you what my Google Translate said in a summary, not copy and paste text. Copy and pasting role PM’s is violating the rules of the game
-->
@Speedrace
HOW IS THAT A CONTRADICTION SPEED? I LOOKED FROM GOOGLE TRANSLATE TO WRITE A SUMMARY ABOUT MY ROLE. LMAO I DID’T SAY IN YOUR 346 I COPIED AND PASTED ROLE JUSTIFICATION I JUST SAID I USED IT TO SEE MY ROLE
-->
@Vader
No, I mean the word for "Mexican/Colombian Authorities". What are those words in your PM.
-->
@drafterman
Colombian
-->
@Vader
Chill dude, why are you screaming 😐
UNVOTE
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Gotcha that makes more senseSmh, "copy and paste" is different from "read and type". Supa is saying that he did the second thing.
-->
@drafterman
Because no one else has claimed miller?
bruh THAT'S WHAT IM ASKING, wHy don't you think anyone else, including scum, has claimed miller?!
His story makes sense but I'm kinda still getting the same panic vibes that he has as scum
-->
@drafterman
I was also trying to hold on to that card, but I'm pretty sure at least 3 people have just come right out and said it. Have you not been reading the DP?Thanks for explaining but why you gotta spoil my secrets
-->
@Vader
who you think is scum
-->
@Bullish
I have but you're the one that pinged me so you get the response. mwa
-->
@Bullish
I think Luna is a bit scum like, and oromagi
-->
@Vader
Just because my claim? Lol
Next time I'm miller I'm lying about it no questions asked.
If Lunatic is scum there's almost no way DD isn't
-->
@Bullish
My #1 mafia pet peeve is when people vote someone and say "oh I'll lynch someone else later" That's bullshit, when I vote someone I want them to die immediately.Famous FT quote:Player - "if you could kill someone, who would it be?"FT - "everyone"
None of this means anything, the plain and simple fact of the matter is that you lied and are now backtracking and scrambling when called out for it. Your original claim indicated this was purely policy, and your second claim indicated behavioral analysis is going into the CC, but now your doubling down on it being policy. I can pass a lot of other off as being lazy, but your trying to play this off as pro town behavioral hunting while essentially being on board for the same lazy bullshit, which makes you by far the scummiest person on the wagon...
Unvote, vtl bullish
-->
@Lunatic
What did he lie about?
-->
@Bullish
No, being CC'd is inherently scummy.
Trying to claim you are pushing a lynch for behavioral reasons when it's clearly policy based is inherently scummy.
Bruh I'm not going to consider a prepackaged case you present to me where you frame yourself to be town, and then come to the conclusion that you're town. You're being manipulative.
Asking what you would do in my shoes is not manipulative, it's making you responsible for your reads. You obviously aren't going to accept I am town prima facie, I want you to explain why you think I have played as scum since claiming miller, or indicate how any of my behavior hasn't been consistent with my claim. You keep trying to make it sound like there is some behavioral read to be had here, like this isn't a lazy oppertunistic lynch. That's absolute bullshit, and I've called you out on it, and rather than address it, you keep dodging this or twisting it. It's why you are by far the scummiest player on the wagon, and whether I will be succesful with getting support for your lynch or not, I will be voting you until you are lynched. And strongly encourage investigative roles on you.
-->
@Speedrace
What did he lie about?
On post 40 he jumps on my wagon "obv scum don't think about it". Indicating he is voting for me based on policy of lynching a CC'ed miller alone. Later he claims there is behavioral reasoning going into the lynching, but when I call him out on post 40, he doubles down on about the policy nature of the lynch.
" Why don't you think arguments over this miller shit isn't a flashpoint for behaviour analysis." (post 223)
Vote Count
Lunatic - (4/7) Bullish, Singularity, Supa, Greyparrot
SupaDudz - (3/7) Zaradi, Oro, Lunatic
Virtuoso - (1/7) Water
Bullish - (1/7) Lunatic
Lmk if I have something wrong
-->
@Speedrace
@Zaradi
btw speed, zaradi when you say it was anti-town for me to vote myself, I dis-agree entirely, and I hope now you can see why. There are legit four players voting for me based on policy right now. There is literally nothing I can do to defend myself from reasoning of this type, whether you are prone to believe there are two millers or not, most of these players will probably have their vote on me for the rest of the game regardless of me not showing up on tracker/watcher reports. There is literally nothing I can do to defend against the argument of "he got CC'ed one of them must be scum". I guaran-fucking-tee you this will continue in every day phase til one of us is lynched. Lynching me is probably the best option to prevent this. Especially if you think if I am scum DD is too, my innocent flip could potentially save DD then its a net benefit.
-->
@Singularity
not everyone feels that way, which is clear. Ragnar/SA was town read in my game for claiming early, as bullish kindly pointed out.The point of the policy lynch is to stop them from claiming. The chances of a cop hitting then are very very low and if they do, we should not be automatically lynching guilty results. I think not claiming has a positive ROI
-->
@Lunatic
I only said that because the best route is simply to try to lynch someone else lol, if you're gonna get lynched then you're gonna get lynched, but if you're not then there's no reason to try to make it happen anyway
-->
@Lunatic
I think your role is inherently scummy when coming from a theme. It's hard to decide, but that's my premise. My behavior scum is Oromagi. Their pressuring and lynch pushing is anti town, and ignoring the fact I claimed Hider in role list seems like they want to paint me as scum