I'll preface this with saying I hate how you keep refusing to use the quote system at times to suit your needs, and its one of DART and DDO's best features. I notice people start doing this when they feel they are losing an argument. Primarily YYW is the one is is pretty prone to do this, and leave a wall of text rather than responding to things individually. What this allows him to do is to make broad over generalizations about a point rather than address it directly, and allows you to mis-represent the opponent (as you tried doing earlier when I asked you what you would do as a town miller who just got CC'ed). The fact that you are doing this at all is a pretty big scum tell in and of itself. It also (like the effect YYW has by doing it) allows a post to look much too massive for players to want to read. People do this in hopes people will skip the fine print dialogue between the two debaters and just go for the summary. People who feel like they are right in their argument don't need to resort to this tactic.
oh my god TUF you've been playing this game for 10 goddamn years how can you not realize this, BEHAVIOUR IS GENERATED BY VOTING PEOPLE, and it is my personal mafia belief that a VOTE should always be backed with the intent to KILL. Of all the people here, why am I having this discussion with YOU.
So if your intention is to outright kill me, so why does my behavior matter if it is your goal that my death is met either way?
You have misrepresented all my positions on your wagon. First of all I never claimed that voting you was based on behaviour, I voted you because you were covered by not 1, but TWO policies.
No it's definitely not that simple. If you would have kept this at your first post, I would buy that. But the fact that your repeatedly defending the idea that there is more logic to this than following lazy policies is where you continuously contradict yourself.
Then I questioned your apparent belief that voting can't generate behaviour.
Again, a blatant lie and mis-representation. See it's convenient not using the qouting system isn't it? You can put words in people's mouths and expect people to buy that as truth. I never said voting can't generate behavior. I defended quite the opposite position in virt's mafia when Supa was on drafter for an RVS vote. I am simply stating it is not in YOUR intention to look at today's lynch behaviorally, you were quite clear from the beginning that this should be a simple solution by voting for me and that we shouldn't over think things.
Like to told Ragnar last game, wanting to lynch people has never been in the history of mafia been lazy. The laziest and lowest activity games typically end in no-reads and no-lynches for a reason.
Pulling info out of your ass or do have a database of information pertaining to every mafia game in history? There are players who are notoriously lazy in this game, 3 of whom are on my wagon, GP, supa, and wylted. It's why I can kinda buy them as maybe being town with it, even if it does continuously piss me off in every game I play with them. You on there otherhand are going out of your way to pretend like there is more to this while also doubling down on this being a lazy easy policy thing. It's why you in particular appear more scummy than the rest.
You're also irrationally critical of 2 SOP reasons to vote you: being miller and being CC'd. Drafter is completely right you are selectively ignoring how this game is played based on your convenience.
Nah, drafter agrees with me about following a policy to conform for survival is different than believing in a policy, that conversation was going in circles, and it's probably why he stopped responding. And while I always argue against policy behavior as town, the whole argument concerning you isn't that you are following policies, it's that you are pretending to do so, but inconsistently. It shows at its core, you are pursuing what you believe to be an easy to sell mis-lynch. And at it's core, you are right. I figured I would have been mis-lynched by now. Lucky there is some sanity among the living players.
As town you would just count those points against you and scum hunt like normal so your behaviours prove your towniness.
I have counted them against me, and it's the reason I am okay with dying this phase. If I am going to die innocent though I am going to try and dish out scum along with me, and that's also what I am doing by FOSing your intentions with this. You have been the unusual one of the bunch on my wagon.
