Where Is God?

These are poetic ways of describing relationship with God.

Not elaborations. Explanations of what these descriptions look like.

I maintain that your interpretation of these "attributes" is superstitious.

The Ultimate Reality is God. If God does not have these attributes, it doesn't change the fact that God exists.

Good atheistic arguments can only at best show what God isn't. It isn't possible to disprove God. It is hardly even readonable to be in doubt about God's existence.

The Ultimate Reality is God.

That is all there is to it. 

It is a complete waste of time to try and kill God. In fact, it is in every way harmful. 

Those who kill God are crucifying The Truth itself. Naturally, this is destructive and misguided. In the end though, you can't kill The Truth. 

The Ultimate Reality exists. It is not simply an error to state otherwise, it is a patently idiotic position. The Ultimate Reality is God, and disputing this is in every way an attempt at being subversive to our doctrine. Subversive in the manner that is dismisses it, and isn't capable of knowing it.]]

What does that lead to? Gulags and re-education camps. The classifying of religious belief as mental illness. It leads to my people beimg oppressed, and certainly we have had plenty of that in recent  times.

Okay, but we already have a word for reality: "reality."

Why do we need to invent a new word for it?

Our doctrine is older than the English language. The words we are using right now to communicate are what are new.

What this does is make specific that we are talkimg about what is eternally reality, and not simply temporal reality.

For example, it is true that Donald Trump is the president of The United States. This is reality. 10 years ago, it was not reality. 10 from now it will not be reality.

The Eternal Reality is always true, never not true. It is not a created reality, it is The Uncreated Reality.

The Ultimate Reality is God as I describe it.

No, I describe God as The Ultimate  Reality.

The Ultimate Reality Is What it Is.

That is God.

That is not what is essential.

You are confused by parables and poetry.

What is essential is that God is The Truth in the realest sense.

1. ronjs started with the claim: "All you have to do is sincerely invite Him in."
   
2. To which I replied: "And then what?"
   
3. To which ronjs continued: "He will let you know what's next."
   
4. And I followed up: "Oh? How long does that usually take? I'm going on 3 decades almost. I hope he decides to do it before I die, since my immortal soul and eternal torment are on the line here."
   

Why are parables and poetry confusing?

Some of the best communicated ideas were given through parables and poetry.

Sure parables and poetry can be confusing, but it seems you want a dialogue on your terms.

Too often the atheist pretends that metaphors, similes, and figures of speech don't exist and feigns confusion. 

If God does exist, it seems highly logical that He would be the ultimate reality, as all reality would have flowed out from Him.

If you do not believe God exists, then OK, but if you allow the possibility, then the most reasonable extended conclusion is mopac's argument that the ultimate truth is God.

If you allow for the possibility of God existing, but deny He is the ultimate truth, why do you refer to Him as God?

The Ultimate Reality is what is meant by God.

The Ultimate Reality exists. By definition it is reality in the truest sense of the word. That which is ultimately real.

There is no reasonable doubt about God's existence.

I don't allow for the possibility of God existing because I deny that he is the ultimate truth/ultimate reality.

I already have a word for reality.

"Reality."

Please explain to me the necessity or utility of coining another word or phrase to describe something which already has an adequate label

"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen."

Excuse me for pointing at the Soviet Union as an example of what happens when people who take our faith as mental illness take power. In effect that is what you are doing by dismissing it outright.

Our doctrine is older than the English language. The words we are using right now to communicate are what are new.

What this does is make specific that we are talkimg about what is eternally reality, and not simply temporal reality.

For example, it is true that Donald Trump is the president of The United States. This is reality. 10 years ago, it was not reality. 10 from now it will not be reality.

The Eternal Reality is always true, never not true. It is not a created reality, it is The Uncreated Reality.