Why do you think journalists sensationalizing things means there has to be some big coordinates conspiracy?
The pandemic narrative while harmful over all, is good business for the media. Sensationalism sells, and the media is kinda a purveyor of perceived truth.
Dis you know members of the media knew of the Epstein stuff like a full year before the general public, but decided not to report on it because of prince Andrew's involvement with Epstein?
This doesn't mean there is some coordinated global conspiracy. It could just mean that a few people know the truth and just ignored it because it benefited them and because they have so much influence everyone took their cuse from them.
The media benefits from sensationalism, so it makes sense that they would interpret things in a certain way if it helps them. We all as humans have a bias. Coincidentally politicians who gain power from a "pandemic" and who tend to be narcissistic because narcissists seek that sort of power. Now have an excuse for a convenient interpretation of the facts that give them more absolute control over a population, and the fact is that it allows them to live out an internal fantasy of being saviors to the people they have control over.
When we get counsel in life they come from different angles. Businesses will often hire consultants in a crisis such as legal consultants.
Legal consultants will tell them to stone wall, keep their mouths shut and to reduce liability maybe even slow down production. Legal counsel will do this because they are o ly concerned about insulating the business from legal problems.
The business might also hire a public relations person who advises them to restore their pu license image from such an accident to open up and admit fault. Show the public the steps they are taking to rectify the problem and to be an open book. You see the public relations person only cares about restoring public trust and has no concern about the legal ramifications a business may face by doing that.
Businesses have many such consultants, it may be 20 suggesting 20 different things that are equally as conflicting as above. This is why you don't just give experts control over how you treat a situation they do not have a balanced view.
What the United States government and many state and local governments are doing is leaning on public health experts almost exclusively, and ignoring economists, legal experts on the legality of these measures and many more different types of consultants. These public health experts only care about one thing. Stopping any spread of disease at all. They will not ever give the green light to open society back up. We will all die of starvation from the eco omy collapsing and the public health experts will only think of whether it is 100% safe to open up, which will never happen.
We are only leaning on public health experts, and like the example businesses above who would fail if they only relied on one type of expert, we are following suit.
You see all the people who have incentive to believe in a very very dangerous pandemic, are pushing that narrative, and the general public are naive. Hell ragnar who believes the pandemic is real is saying the officials are lying and that the 4% numbers they spread are closer to just below 1%.
Read above what Stephen said. His wife is a nurse and he is saying that she is personally reporting that not every single hospital is a warzone like the media is saying.
My argument has been that this thing is a little over blown. I think the facts are with me here. Would you like to debate me on whether some of the media and some politicians have engaged in exaggerations during this "crisis".?
