No, it isn't, that's YOUR definition. You're adding something that is in no way necessary, again. The definition of UFO is right in the abbreviation: it's merely an unidentified flying object. You add the "not apparently made by humans" without earning it. I know it's tempting to think that, but there isn't any reason to. A UFO can be a drone, it can be a meteor, it can be a reflection or optical illusion. It can be a lot of things, including alien spacecraft, but by adding the "not apparently made by humans," you are adding your own theory and inviting confirmation bias. Next step is a conspiracy theory: because it was hidden it MUST be aliens, when really it could be classified aircraft they don't want to reveal to the public or enemy versions of the same.
I'm sorry, did you think I made that term up?
On April 27, 2020, the US Department of Defense issued a public statement authorising the release of three “UFO” videos taken by US Navy pilots.
The footage appears to depict airborne, heat-emitting objects with no visible wings, fuselage or exhaust, performing aerodynamically in ways that no known aircraft can achieve. The DoD doesn’t use the terms “unidentified flying object” or “UFO” but does clearly state “the aerial phenomena observed in the videos remain characterized as ‘unidentified’.”
Thoughts about what UFOs are vary widely – from illusions to alien spacecraft. However, a workable, conservative definition is: “intelligently-controlled airborne objects not apparently made by humans”.
I'm not talking about UFOs in general. I'm talking about the official disclosure of the 3 released videos. I know what UFO means. The term is broad. Anything to some degree can be a UFO, or partial UFO. For instance, someone can observe a bird flying, but not able to identify the species. They know it's a bird, or probably a bird, but unfamiliar with the species. But that's not what we're talking about. These objects are not birds. Another term they're using is Unidentified aerial phenomena. So these UFOs are not unidentified in the sense that they can be anything (bird, balloon, frisbee, etc.). It's determined that due to the aerial maneuvering of the objects that they most likely are being operated by an intelligent force.
And for emphasis, this is not a conspiracy theory. This is information given to the public.
How is this a "likely possibility"? What other dimension?
Isn't that like asking what planet do they come from?
How is it possible?
Again, how is it possible to travel from planets that would require them to be probably be far beyond our solar system? We can't do it.
Not even close. They might, but they don't have to.
To make sure we're on the same page, and you're not confusing my statement with could they be something else like weather balloons, another alternative might be inter-dimensional travel, right?
