Hey guys! Was looking back at the first game I did and I want to do it again. I promise it won't flop like the second one. Role madness again of course, just meaning there are no vanillas or goons. I'm going to make the theme more specific soon, I'm thinking MCU Villains but we'll see. Please lemme know if you're interested!
Marvel Themed Mafia Signups
Topic's posts
Posts in total:
73
-
-
--> @SpeedraceMarvel has very few characters that are clear cut town, this will be interesting and scumsided as there's also so many chars to claim. I'm up for a challenge. -
/in -
/in -
--> @SpeedraceUmmm you kinda skipped everyone on the mafia sign up list -
--> @SupaDudzLet him
-
--> @RationalMadmanNo xDHe wasn't even on hold. That means he had no games even close to the works. The procedure is the list we made. We must follow the list. If people go inactive, we push the next person up and so forth. That's how it is. You can't just cut
-
This isn't Lucky and Lunatic's little mafia clique where you can do what you want. No offense to Speed, but we have a procedure for a reason
-
--> @Speedraceis it QF?
-
--> @SupaDudzWhy didn't the next one in queue start their hosting thread? The rest seem like inactives to me who have pretty much quit DART or at least taken a Hiatus. Lunatic barely uses this website at all and dodged the last game (the one Pie is hosting).
-
--> @RationalMadmanLook at the list before he updated it.Assuming warren42 and Bullish don't return, it would be Mharmans turn, then Press, then mine
-
--> @SupaDudzI was on hold, I have no idea why no one put me in the hold list like they did Lunatic but I should've been in there. And last I checked, people on hold can come out and take the first spot if they want
-
1. Bearman2. Crocodile3. RationalMadman
-
--> @SupaDudzMharman and Bullish have effectively quit DART, they do nothing on the website at all.
-
--> @SpeedraceI just realized no one ever put you on hold in the first place. I didn't know you gave up your spot to iLikePie because I never saw you on hold. I apologize./in
-
--> @RationalMadmanExactly. So then you move to the spot in order of what's in the hopper. You can't just sign up at your will unless you come out of on hold. Speed was on hold, but Pie failed to put him on hold, hence the confusion
-
--> @SupaDudzNo. It's your system that is wrong. If you leave a queue for too long, the next one up is going to get served instead of you.
-
--> @RationalMadmanThe system is effective. We have a game going on and it's up to the people to keep that order. If they go inactive, the next person goes up, then the next, until one in the hopper signs up, OR, the one On Hold goes off hold and posts their sign ups
-
--> @SupaDudzI am saying it's not effective. I am also saying I don't care. Speedrace agrees and was neglected by your system's corruption apparently.
-
--> @RationalMadmanWell that's not my fault that someone forgot to add him. The system isn't corrupt at all, just someone didn't understand it and caused it to screw up. When done correctly, it's effective
-
--> @SupaDudzHe was next on the list if it were done correctly, according to him.
-
--> @RationalMadmanHe was, I admitted to that. Read what I said
-
--> @SupaDudzAgree to disagree then (since either way Speedrace gets to host and the 'morality of mafia signup hierarchy' is hardly a pressing issue for me).I still stand by what I said, hosting should only be ordered once multiple active users want to host, not inactive ones.
-
--> @SupaDudzLol no need to apologise, I understand
-
1. Bearman2. Crocodile3. RationalMadman4. SupaDudz