-->
@PGA2.0
Such as current scientific observations, data, evidence and explanations. If you can't bothered to educate yourself on what's going on in this regard, you don't really have a position to opine on such things.
I can think of only a limited amount of possibilities such as:1) life was created,2) life came about by chance,3) life is an illusion.But, that's only what you can think of, yet there are other alternative you haven't thought of, hence you're making your decisions based on personal incredulity and ignorance. Just because you haven't educated yourself, doesn't mean others haven't also.Such as?Such as current scientific observations, data, evidence and explanations. If you can't bothered to educate yourself on what's going on in this regard, you don't really have a position to opine on such things.
That's not science, that's being biased. You look at the data and it will tell us how reality works, no interpretations required.Either you look at the DATA and interpret it from a naturalist or supernatural viewpoint
I look at the scientific evidence in a way that confirms God's existence
Newton saw science as a way of investigating God's creation and finding out more about his Creator
Darwin saw science as a way or separating God from creation.
Either you look at the DATA and interpret it from a naturalist or supernatural viewpointThat's not science, that's being biased. You look at the data and it will tell us how reality works, no interpretations required.
I look at the scientific evidence in a way that confirms God's existenceThat's being biased and is not how science works. There is absolutely nothing in any scientific data that has ever confirmed any gods existence, including your God.
Newton saw science as a way of investigating God's creation and finding out more about his CreatorYet, Newton found nothing about any Creator.
Darwin saw science as a way or separating God from creation.That is entirely and completely false. Darwin was being a scientist without the same bias as you have. He looked at the data and realized all living things evolved.
Clearly, you have a deep bias against science and what science has discovered. It's no wonder why you know so little about it and that which you do know is wrong.
Prove it, don't just assert it.You confuse science with scientism.
Origins of life or the universe are not repeatable events, otherwise, we could experiment and recreate the universe or life from non-life.
The focus shifted to finding answers by human measures alone.
Data does not tell us anything. How we interpret that data guide us in our thinking.
News flash: We are all biased. There is NO neutrality.
Newton saw a monotheistic God as the masterful creator
So, Newton tried to think of things in terms of God's creation. He was discovering how God directed nature to His will.
Thus, he rejected the biblical revelation.
And clearly you have a deep bias against God
We do science because there is a uniformity of nature
There is no reason in a universe devoid of God why we should be able to do this. Science relies on there being uniformity. There would be no laws, and no science, without things happening in the same manner repeatedly.
You confuse science with scientism.Prove it, don't just assert it.
Origins of life or the universe are not repeatable events, otherwise, we could experiment and recreate the universe or life from non-life.Please tell us how to recreate life in a laboratory? Since the process took millions of years, please tell us how to recreate an experiment that represents millions of years? This is your ignorance of science.
The focus shifted to finding answers by human measures alone.That's because Religions failed to provide answers that align with the evidence of nature. This again is your ignorance of science.
Data does not tell us anything. How we interpret that data guide us in our thinking.Wrong, the data tells us everything, you are biased to interpret it. Again, your ignorance of science.
News flash: We are all biased. There is NO neutrality.No, YOU are biased, YOU had no neutrality. Science MUST be neutral or else we would never learn anything. YOU are biased, that's why you never learn anything. Again, your ignorance of science.
Newton saw a monotheistic God as the masterful creatorNewton never found a Creator, ever. No one has found a Creator. It's all about faith and bias.
So, Newton tried to think of things in terms of God's creation. He was discovering how God directed nature to His will.If Newton were alive today and understood current scientific theories, he would know he was wrong about that, just like you are.
Thus, he rejected the biblical revelation.Wrong, Darwin did no such thing. Your ignorance is huge on the topic of science.
And clearly you have a deep bias against GodThat's impossible, God would have to exist before I could have a bias against God. Not only that, I have never said anything against your God to show a bias. That's a big fail on your part. Another lame excuse for you not being able to form a valid argument.
We do science because there is a uniformity of natureNo, we do science because we want to learn. You don't want to learn, you want to remain ignorant and biased.
There is no reason in a universe devoid of God why we should be able to do this. Science relies on there being uniformity. There would be no laws, and no science, without things happening in the same manner repeatedly.Word salad, meaningless.We have now established your massive ignorance of science, hence you have no position to comment on the topic. Pretty much everything you say is wrong and biased. Perhaps, you're best to stay away from this topic and try to work your way back to the topic and tell us why God didn't write the Bible?
No Creator was found. Show me any documentation that shows a Creator was found?Back that statement up with fact.
Some of his views were true and are still used today.
No, he changed the way people looked at both science and God.
Speaking from a limited, subjective human being who denies God and is deaf, dumb and blind to God
Science is not possible without natures uniformity. We could predict nothing unless we were confident it was constant. There would be no laws without constants. Why do we find constants in a mindless, unintentional happenstance universe? These are questions you have no answers to that are reasonable.
What have you established?
sorry, i thought you read what happened when the Chosen People left egypt
in the sinia YHVH TOLD Moses to build a TENT
This Christmas, millions will recite the Genesis story, words written 6,000+ ago will ring out all over the world. And millions will worship, praise, thank, and adore Him to whom other kings bow.
His name will be reverently whispered by millions in every language in every culture in every corner of the globe. His acts will be re-inacted, His comments spoken again, and millions will find joy and peace in His person and message.
The atheist will be in his dank, dark, corner, fuming and bitter, like a blind ant, shaking his fist at the sun.