You are not nuetral. You undermine and reject NANABOZHO among others in many ways, as is demonstrated by your twenty posts to me alone,
You are recycling my posts with minor adjustments.
You are right, I am not neutral. I do reject NANABOZHO on the basis that I believe the Christian God is the ONE true God. For the two articles I read on this god, there is internal inconsistency in such a belief.
"Nanabozho's grandmother, who named him,...Nanabozho is a trickster figure and can be a bit of a rascal,..."
He has a grandmother which signified to me that he may have begun to exist and is not the supreme deity but a lesser figure that derives existence from some other source. Such a god seems not be the Creator or Originator, perhaps just one of a myriad of created beings.
"Known as a trickster, Nanabozo plays a dual role in Indigenous oral traditions. On the one hand, he protects and even creates life. On the other, he is associated with mischief and breaking the rules. His adventures and misadventures are meant to teach right from wrong and how to live a good life."
A trickster. How can I trust such a deity?
"As their name suggests however, tricksters are also associated with rule-breaking..."
***
Actually, I have only posted to you four times, this is my fifth. You have added so many posts (15 more addressed to me which makes 45 in total) I find it dizzy trying to keep up with them all.
***
I wanted you to commit before I continued. Now I know you are a deist I will continue in order of post starting with your claims about worldviews.
Two other questions, what deity do you believe in or are you unsure and what do you know about your said deity?
let alone those to others. If I pressed you (providing you claimed to be a non-follower of NANABOZHO) I would (MIGHT) find you have views on life's ultimate questions, such as origins of life, the universe, morals or values, meaning, purpose, truth and knowledge, for starters. Again, you are not nuetral.
You are mostly recycling my words.
I find sufficient answers in the biblical God plus I find the 66 writings that comprise the Christian belief that are unified and consistent in major themes such as origins, sin, and God's covenant relationship with Israel as it progresses. I find on almost every page of Scripture in the OT a typological revelation of Jesus Christ and in the NT a greater revelation of Him. I find prophecy that is reasonable and logical to believe as true in that the evidence points to it as being written before the fact or event in question. Prophecy is one of many confirmations. I find the description of the biblical God as sufficient in explaining origins.
Do you consider yourself "neutral" regarding the existence and undeniable holy might and majesty of NANABOZHO?
No, I believe in no god but the biblical deity, so I am not neutral. Truth is not neutral. It takes a position that is very narrow. That can be easily demonstrated with mathematics as an example. If I have one apple and I add another apple I have two apples. One object plus another object are two objects. 1+1=2, not 5, 10, 14, 70, 755...
Let me take a few wild guesses.
(1) origins of life = "YHWH"
(2) morals or values = "YHWH"
(3) meaning, purpose = SERVE AND OBEY "YHWH"
(4) truth and knowledge = READ THE BOOK OF "YHWH"
Correct. I have not hidden my beliefs like you. Your profile page is blank. You have committed to deity but which one(s)? How is your deity consistent? Are you a native America and Nanabozho is your deity?
