I'm wondering if inanimate objects should express evolution as do living organisms. The recent Twitter kerfuffle has prompted me to wonder if the powder-blue, sweety-tweety-bird image is entirely appropriate, given its new-found predatory nature. Shouldn't it evolve claws and a hooked beak?
Should corporate logos express evolution?
Topic's posts
Posts in total:
11
-
-
--> @fauxlaw*draws the Duolingo bird holding my family hostage*
21 days later
-
Well essentially you can draw a logo that used to be a single-cell organism a person. -
Define "evolution". The current "evolution" we have is complicated pictures to inanimate color blocks.
-
--> @fauxlawThat would be great, yes definitely. -
--> @TheweakeredgeI'm working on a new logo for them. It's one of the things I do.
-
--> @fauxlawOh? Any particular bird that you're working off as a base? Or are you just going for a general predator?
-
--> @Theweakeredgeimagine "alien" [Sigourney Weaver's nemesis] with wings
-
That's.... terrifyingly awesome. I love it, Im rooting for your logo
-
I'm wondering if inanimate objects should express evolution as do living organisms. The recent Twitter kerfuffle has prompted me to wonder if the powder-blue, sweety-tweety-bird image is entirely appropriate, given its new-found predatory nature. Shouldn't it evolve claws and a hooked beak?Is this an argument against evolution? -
--> @armoredcatNo, it's an argument against a business entity representing itself as a harmless tweety bird when it is a predator. A logo is a graphic mark intended to aid business identity