I'm wondering if inanimate objects should express evolution as do living organisms. The recent Twitter kerfuffle has prompted me to wonder if the powder-blue, sweety-tweety-bird image is entirely appropriate, given its new-found predatory nature. Shouldn't it evolve claws and a hooked beak?
Should corporate logos express evolution?
Posts
Total:
11
21 days later
Define "evolution". The current "evolution" we have is complicated pictures to inanimate color blocks.
-->
@fauxlaw
Oh? Any particular bird that you're working off as a base? Or are you just going for a general predator?
I'm wondering if inanimate objects should express evolution as do living organisms. The recent Twitter kerfuffle has prompted me to wonder if the powder-blue, sweety-tweety-bird image is entirely appropriate, given its new-found predatory nature. Shouldn't it evolve claws and a hooked beak?
Is this an argument against evolution?
-->
@Username
No, it's an argument against a business entity representing itself as a harmless tweety bird when it is a predator. A logo is a graphic mark intended to aid business identity