-->
@HistoryBuff
true, but you don't seem to understand. lets a say a women is murdered and the husband had means, motive and opportunity. But there is no direct evidence to prove he did it. Saying there is no evidence he did it is an accurate statement. But it would also be an accurate statement to say that a crime was committed and the husband is the prime suspect. It depends on how you want to spin the available facts.The story about how Giuliani got this info is super suspicious and highly unlikely. he has admitted to working with a known Russian operative. he has means, motive and opportunity. So while the FBI may not evidence the Russians gave him the info, it is still the most likely conclusion. It has all the hallmarks of a russian intelligence operation and the version given by Giuliani makes little sense.
Glad we agree that there is no evidence right now that this is a Russian disinformation campaign. I didn’t know you could predict future.
I said he presented information in a biased way.
How is it biased to lay out a fact that there is no evidence of it being a Russian disinformation campaign lol. If the FBI thought DNI was lying then they would say it. The fact they didn’t shows they agree.
