Live debate practice

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:01PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:01PM

Virtuoso/David says he plans on starting a live debate tournament on the site. I think that's a great idea, but I'm very rusty in live debate (as I assume other people are too).

Is anyone down to do some live debate practice at some point? Wouldn't be super competitive obviously, as of course we'd be doing it just to brush up on our skills a bit.

Topic's author

#2

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:01PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:01PM

If we get enough people interested, could always do a little practice tournament

#3

Debates: 27

Posts: 3,327

4

6

10

12.16.2020 02:16PM

4

6

10

12.16.2020 02:16PM

-->

@MisterChris

I’d be down. Super rusty myself, could use the practice.

Topic's author

#4

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:20PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:20PM

-->

@whiteflame

awesome. We can pick a topic and maybe do something over Christmas Break, gives some time to prep.

And if other people are interested too I see no reason we couldn't just make a Google/Zoom meet and do some practice rounds as a group.

#5

Debates: 27

Posts: 3,327

4

6

10

12.16.2020 02:24PM

4

6

10

12.16.2020 02:24PM

-->

@MisterChris

Could even do some team debates if people are interested. Haven’t found a good way to do them via text, but works perfectly fine live.

Topic's author

#6

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:24PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:24PM

-->

@whiteflame

Oh yeah that's true. Like some mock PF rounds. Would need at least 4 for that

#7

Debates: 27

Posts: 3,327

4

6

10

12.16.2020 02:33PM

4

6

10

12.16.2020 02:33PM

-->

@MisterChris

PF, Parli or even Policy if people are up for it (that last one is not my cup of tea, personally, but to each their own). And yeah, that would require at least 4. A BP round would require 8, so I'm not going to suggest that unless we get a flood of interest.

Topic's author

#8

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:34PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:34PM

-->

@whiteflame

lmaoo I have never done parli, policy or even BP whatever that is. so that would be interesting

Topic's author

#9

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:35PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:35PM

-->

@whiteflame

only done PF, LD, Big Question, Congress, and Extemp if that even counts.

#10

Debates: 27

Posts: 3,327

4

6

10

12.16.2020 02:39PM

4

6

10

12.16.2020 02:39PM

-->

@MisterChris

My experience is almost all NPDA and BP (British Parliamentary debate - 4 teams of 2, 2 sides - it sounds complicated, but it's a lot of fun) with some small experience in Congress, Oratorical Interp, Duo and Impromptu speech. I've also judged PF, LD (did a couple of online debates in this) and Policy, so I'm familiar with the formats.

Topic's author

#11

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:46PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:46PM

-->

@whiteflame

BP does sound like a lot of fun. I think we'll be doing well if we get 2 more people though

#12

Debates: 27

Posts: 3,327

4

6

10

12.16.2020 02:47PM

4

6

10

12.16.2020 02:47PM

I have a decent amount of experience in coaching debate as well. If people are interested in using this to prepare for tournaments or learning about various formats, I’d be happy to facilitate.

Topic's author

#13

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:48PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:48PM

-->

@David

@Barney

@Speedrace

@seldiora

@Undefeatable

Interested?

Topic's author

#14

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:50PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 02:50PM

-->

@Intelligence_06

@Theweakeredge

Interested?

#15

seldiora

Debates: 158

Posts: 352

2

6

10

seldiora

12.16.2020 03:49PM

2

6

10

12.16.2020 03:49PM

-->

@MisterChris

Sure.

Topic's author

#16

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 03:51PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 03:51PM

-->

@seldiora

OK that's 3 then. Just need at least one more for a 2 v 2 practice round

#17

Theweakeredge

Debates: 33

Posts: 3,457

4

7

10

Theweakeredge

12.16.2020 04:05PM

4

7

10

12.16.2020 04:05PM

-->

@MisterChris

MM, Id be up for it, not anytime currently though

Topic's author

#18

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 04:12PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 04:12PM

-->

@Theweakeredge

I see, we were thinking of Christmas Break

#19

Debates: 9

Posts: 755

3

6

11

12.16.2020 05:02PM

3

6

11

12.16.2020 05:02PM

I think the tournament should have a consistent topic

#20

Debates: 9

Posts: 755

3

6

11

12.16.2020 05:02PM

3

6

11

12.16.2020 05:02PM

Also make it LD style

Topic's author

#21

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 05:03PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 05:03PM

-->

@Username

yeah not sure what exactly David plans for it, you'll have to tell him your suggestions. unless you mean the practice rounds we're planning

#22

Debates: 27

Posts: 3,327

4

6

10

12.16.2020 05:20PM

4

6

10

12.16.2020 05:20PM

-->

@Username

Personally prefer changing up the topic between rounds and having short prep periods, but I'd consider doing a single topic.

#23

Debates: 9

Posts: 755

3

6

11

12.16.2020 05:25PM

3

6

11

12.16.2020 05:25PM

-->

@whiteflame

Personally prefer changing up the topic between rounds and having short prep periods, but I'd consider doing a single topic.

I guess that could work but if you only have a bit of prep time you can't have any blocks and stock cases will probably be the only viable options. In addition I feel like a unified topic allows for a variety of perspectives on each and ability to prep for various opponents based on the cases that they're running

#24

Debates: 27

Posts: 3,327

4

6

10

12.16.2020 05:35PM

4

6

10

12.16.2020 05:35PM

-->

@Username

I guess that could work but if you only have a bit of prep time you can't have any blocks and stock cases will probably be the only viable options. In addition I feel like a unified topic allows for a variety of perspectives on each and ability to prep for various opponents based on the cases that they're running

I think we have different ideas for what a "block" is in the context of a debate (my experience with a block is two speeches from the same side back-to-back, which I'm guessing is not what you're referencing here), so I can't speak to that. A lot of people do run stock cases, though there are easy work-arounds that prevent that kind of behavior (pick debate topics that aren't absurdly common and aren't too vague) and I've only rarely struggled to come up with a case on the fly.

I'm just generally not as big of a fan of a unified topic. That's almost certainly a result of my experiences, but I've generally found that unified topic debates can get pretty repetitive between rounds. That's not to say that there's no room for creativity and variety, but I've definitely had tournaments where there was great creativity and ones where there wasn't so much. You also run the risk of that single topic being Pro- or Con-slanted, which is, of course, a concern if you have multiple topics as well, but isn't as all-encompassing of a problem in that instance.

Topic's author

#25

Debates: 45

Posts: 2,897

5

10

11

12.16.2020 05:38PM

5

10

11

12.16.2020 05:38PM

-->

@whiteflame

my experience with a block is two speeches from the same side back-to-back, which I'm guessing is not what you're referencing here

At least in PF terminology, a "block" is a pre-prepped response to an opponent's anticipated argument

#26

Debates: 9

Posts: 755

3

6

11

12.16.2020 05:39PM

3

6

11

12.16.2020 05:39PM

-->

@whiteflame

For me, blocks are pre-prepared responses to various arguments. They're good because without them you'll have to do all rebuttals to cases by thinking on your feet or cross-applying your own questionably relevant evidence, and so debaters will always be at a disadvantage on defense because offense will usually be the side with cards

#27

Debates: 27

Posts: 3,327

4

6

10