Trolley problem

I think that's more of a "rational" choice than a purely instinctive (moral) choice.

It is BECAUSE an infant needs more protection that our instincts (generally) more strongly coax us to protect infants.

Yes, I agree and it is those instincts that kick in more in some than others, altho when our own detriment is involved in situations where we may have a minute or seconds more to consider our options we may be allowed to override Swarm AI primary codes.

Good concept, tho without input of all humans ---ergo all human cultures---, we may still have some parts of the Trinary Core Code that have uncalled for cracks in the code.

I have a feeling the underlying AXIOMS (moral instincts) are very similar for all social mammals.

Please provide a specific example.

Please provide a specific example.

Do I really need to provide a specific example of someone thinking about doing something before they actually do it?

Do you ever cause harm when your intentions are morally pure?

Do pure intentions (or ignorance of the law) absolve an agent from unintended (or unforseen) consequences?