The lack of people

Author: DebateArt.com ,

Posts

Total: 19
DebateArt.com
DebateArt.com's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,278
3
3
8
DebateArt.com's avatar
DebateArt.com
3
3
8
I've seen people complaining that we barely have any people here and that's true, but I wanted to point out some things nevertheless.

So first of all, the site has been in production for only 3 months and is still barely indexed by Google, hell if I know why, but it is what it is. Maybe because we don't have a mobile version but I am not sure. But despite that, I still have a few ideas how we could attract new blood here, but it needs to be understood that before it happens, we need to have all the required tools to prevent bad shit from happening and that's gonna take some time to implement and test them. There is simply no way to attract only smart and decent people; idiots, spammers, bots will follow anyway, so we need to be sure that we can contain them.

So the bottom line is that at this point, it's better to have 100 decent and smart people than 300 with 2/3 of those being trouble makers.

Once we have, among other things, some filtering mechanisms, like sandboxes for the new users or stuff like that, we'll let them flood in and cherry pick the good ones.
Castin
Castin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,056
3
2
6
Castin's avatar
Castin
3
2
6
--> @DebateArt.com
Duly noted. I'll endeavor to be patient.

When do the 100 decent and smart people show up? Will I be replaced with one of them?
DebateArt.com
DebateArt.com's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,278
3
3
8
DebateArt.com's avatar
DebateArt.com
3
3
8
--> @Castin
Hahaha, I am also waiting for them
Tyrone
Tyrone's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 103
0
2
5
Tyrone's avatar
Tyrone
0
2
5
--> @DebateArt.com
Right now we have like 10 users, with 2/3 of them being trouble-makers.
Tyrone
Tyrone's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 103
0
2
5
Tyrone's avatar
Tyrone
0
2
5
--> @DebateArt.com
Removing Bsh1 as mod would increase the number of users substantially.
Tyrone
Tyrone's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 103
0
2
5
Tyrone's avatar
Tyrone
0
2
5
--> @DebateArt.com
Appoint TheHammer as Bsh1's replacement. He would make an excellent mod.
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,474
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
I've been tracking traffic in the site, and it has increased slightly. Keep in mind that traffic is not the same as number of users. I think traffic is more important for growth than number of members.

All in all, the site is doing fine Mike. You just keep on track and we will stay with you.

Note to members. Do a search for debate art.com on google each day. Google uses number of searches to rank sites. Our searches will be from wide IP geographic locations. It's not much, but every little bit helps.
Castin
Castin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,056
3
2
6
Castin's avatar
Castin
3
2
6
--> @ethang5
Thanks for the tip. I'll do that.
DebateArt.com
DebateArt.com's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,278
3
3
8
DebateArt.com's avatar
DebateArt.com
3
3
8
--> @ethang5
Yeah, you are absolutely right, it has increased but only slightly, just as you mentioned. And thank you!

Regarding the search optimization, I think at this point we can just wait, we have submitted around 1000+ links for the website but at this point only 300 have been indexed, so it's taking a while. 
1harderthanyouthink
1harderthanyouthink's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 256
0
1
3
1harderthanyouthink's avatar
1harderthanyouthink
0
1
3
I think that the fact the site hasn't collapsed in userbase already means it will be fine in the long run.
DebateArt.com
DebateArt.com's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,278
3
3
8
DebateArt.com's avatar
DebateArt.com
3
3
8
--> @1harderthanyouthink
What do you by "hasn't collapsed in userbase" ?
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 10,661
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
--> @DebateArt.com
He's being an optimistic pessimist.
1harderthanyouthink
1harderthanyouthink's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 256
0
1
3
1harderthanyouthink's avatar
1harderthanyouthink
0
1
3
--> @DebateArt.com
The number of users hasn't gone into decline since the post-DDO rush had mostly passed.
DebateArt.com
DebateArt.com's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,278
3
3
8
DebateArt.com's avatar
DebateArt.com
3
3
8
--> @1harderthanyouthink
Oh I see, thanks for explaining. 
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 2,385
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
No one is going go come here to debate with stupid topics standing and debate votes being deleted by a power hungry mod. 
ethang5
ethang5's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 5,474
3
3
6
ethang5's avatar
ethang5
3
3
6
--> @Polytheist-Witch
There really is a problem with the voting moderation. One one debate, three votes were deleted by bsh1 from one side with the other mod dissenting. The odds of getting your vote deleted increases if you vote for the conservative position.

And guess who just became the top debater? Yep. bsh1. Isn't that convenient. Sometimes it seems bsh1 is working to roll back every advance Mike is working towards.
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 2,385
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
--> @ethang5
All of my votes from Saturday were deleted yesterday and I was given a rules violation. Not to mention you loose the points. This place is worse the DDO. If that could be possible. 
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 10,661
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
--> @Polytheist-Witch
You think you should keep points to gain medals from fallacious votes?
Polytheist-Witch
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 2,385
3
3
6
Polytheist-Witch's avatar
Polytheist-Witch
3
3
6
--> @RationalMadman
Not liking my vote is not reason to remove it. Stupid morons are not running a debate site but a playground for immature douche bags.