Poll on Moderation

Author: Tyrone ,

Posts

Total: 188
Tyrone
Tyrone's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 103
0
2
5
Tyrone's avatar
Tyrone
0
2
5
Please indicate if you agree, disagree, or have no opinion:

Bsh1 should be replaced as chief mod by someone who has a more lax approach to moderation. 
Tyrone
Tyrone's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 103
0
2
5
Tyrone's avatar
Tyrone
0
2
5
I'm gonna put in a vote for "Agree" obviously.
Tyrone
Tyrone's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 103
0
2
5
Tyrone's avatar
Tyrone
0
2
5
== Vote Count ==

PRO-BSH
0

ANTI-BSH
1

NEITHER
0
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 10,661
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
Disagree actually would agree to the opposite type of replacement.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 10,661
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
I would support virtuoso replacing bsh1 as head.
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 28
Posts: 3,814
3
4
10
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
10
--> @Tyrone
Agree
Tyrone
Tyrone's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 103
0
2
5
Tyrone's avatar
Tyrone
0
2
5
== Vote Count ==

PRO-BSH
1

ANTI-BSH
2

NEITHER
0

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 10,661
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
--> @Tyrone
Why is 'neither' an option?
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 10,661
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
--> @Tyrone
Anyone who votes neither is just a soft-disagree-user and you are trying to split the population to make agree seem more of a majority or less of a minority than it is.
Tyrone
Tyrone's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 103
0
2
5
Tyrone's avatar
Tyrone
0
2
5
Yes... I'm trying to get an idea of how many people actually care one way or the other.

Also, unblock me, you fucking bitch.
David
David's avatar
Debates: 84
Posts: 1,206
4
7
10
David's avatar
David
4
7
10
--> @RationalMadman @Tyrone
Stop. Both of you stop replying to each other. 

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 10,661
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
--> @David
Or what? From what I see godltop is entirely entiteld to harass me for 100 posts straight where I beg him to stop.
Tyrone
Tyrone's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 103
0
2
5
Tyrone's avatar
Tyrone
0
2
5
--> @David
Fuck off.
Tyrone
Tyrone's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 103
0
2
5
Tyrone's avatar
Tyrone
0
2
5
It is incredibly dishonest to equate 

"I'm indifferent to the whether or not you change the status quo" 
 
with

"I support the status quo."

RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 10,661
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
--> @Tyrone
While the latter is more passionate, I do not see an actual difference other than an excuse to separate two approaches to disagreeing for the sake of 'agree' appearing as a bigger slice of the pie.
Tyrone
Tyrone's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 103
0
2
5
Tyrone's avatar
Tyrone
0
2
5
There is clearly a meaningful difference between the two. If you can't see why, that's your problem.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 10,661
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
--> @Tyrone
Since I posted it here, those who would initially have voted 'neither' hopefully will catch on and instead of my problem it shall become yours.
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 28
Posts: 3,814
3
4
10
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
10
--> @Tyrone
Also, unblock me, you fucking bitch.

He won't. He's scared of you
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 10,661
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
Yes, terrified.

Do remind me when you'll unblock me, good sir.
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 28
Posts: 3,814
3
4
10
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
10
Coward, it is always directly after a bannable insult that he blocks somebody. You can try to justify it all you want, but there is only one sensible reason to block somebody and that is because you fear what they will say to you. If there was an alternative reason it would have already been mentioned. You can try making up an alternate explanation now though.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 10,661
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
Do remind me when you'll unblock me.
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 28
Posts: 3,814
3
4
10
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
10
I blocked you because I'm not going to give you the power to ping me if I can't do the same to you. This is like when you were a child, and you had that thing happen to you, you was too afraid to talk about.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 348
Posts: 10,661
10
10
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
10
11
You can try to justify it all you want, but there is only one sensible reason to block somebody and that is because you fear what they will say to you. If there was an alternative reason it would have already been mentioned. You can try making up an alternate explanation now though.

I blocked you because I'm not going to give you the power to ping me if I can't do the same to you. This is like when you were a child, and you had that thing happen to you, you was too afraid to talk about.


Tyrone
Tyrone's avatar
Debates: 1
Posts: 103
0
2
5
Tyrone's avatar
Tyrone
0
2
5
There we go again with the false equivocation. Reciprocating a block is not the same as initiating a block.
Wylted
Wylted's avatar
Debates: 28
Posts: 3,814
3
4
10
Wylted's avatar
Wylted
3
4
10
If there was an alternative reason it would have already been mentioned

Notice how I mentioned my alternative reason immediately when motives were brought up. Because I have a sensible alternate explanation, but since you don't you haven't mentioned motive. You have no reason to keep the motive secret unless it is something to be ashamed of. Since you have failed to mention a sensible motive, it follows that you are a scared little bitch.