POLL: Should Reporting Be Anonymous?

Author: drafterman

Posts

Total: 312
#301
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
-->
@drafterman
Who decided there should be continuity? The decision that DART should be DDO 2.0 seems to have been made unilaterally.
The very fact that the majority of the userbase here is from DDO made it only logical to provide continuity in standards until changes to those standards could be decided and moderation customized to the site.
Topic's author
#302
drafterman
drafterman's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 5,653
3
6
9
drafterman's avatar
drafterman
3
6
9
-->
@bsh1
Oh? If that was the case then Mike should be the inaccessible owner who lets the site devolve into chaos overridden by spam. The forums should be formatted exactly the same. The ban list should carry over. Airmax should be the mod. Etc. Etc. Etc.

No, you made a conscious decision to keep some aspects and abandon others. I don't recall any of these being put to vote or even a discussion.

It is NOT a given that DART should be DDO 2.0 and some people - myself as an example - came here hoping that it wouldn't be. I left DDO because it was a shithole long before the spam bots took over.

This is a new site and should be evaluated as a new site. Any policies should stand on their own merits not merely de facto adopted because they were what people did on DDO. For example, using DDO threads and policies designed for DDO on issues here, when they are not encoded in this site's COC, should be out of line.

#303
bsh1
bsh1's avatar
Debates: 14
Posts: 2,589
5
5
8
bsh1's avatar
bsh1
5
5
8
Oh? If that was the case then Mike should be the inaccessible owner who lets the site devolve into chaos overridden by spam. The forums should be formatted exactly the same. The ban list should carry over. Airmax should be the mod. Etc. Etc. Etc.
That remark is not only gratuitous, but a deliberate strawman, as well you know.

Regardless, I wish you a happy Thanksgiving. TTYL.
Topic's author
#304
drafterman
drafterman's avatar
Debates: 6
Posts: 5,653
3
6
9
drafterman's avatar
drafterman
3
6
9
-->
@bsh1
It is not a deliberate strawman, but you don't exactly grant me the respect of me deciding my own motivations, so it's no surprise there. I notice no other refutation of my other points. You go for a tangential blow and disappear.
#305
1harderthanyouthink
1harderthanyouthink's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 256
0
1
3
1harderthanyouthink's avatar
1harderthanyouthink
0
1
3
-->
@RationalMadman
You didn't even make an argument. You just made a lazy equivalency.
#306
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@1harderthanyouthink
Calling something lazy doesn't prove it's lazy nor does saying I didn't so something that I did make it less successfully done.
#307
1harderthanyouthink
1harderthanyouthink's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 256
0
1
3
1harderthanyouthink's avatar
1harderthanyouthink
0
1
3
-->
@RationalMadman
This is pathetic.
#308
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@1harderthanyouthink
Keep insulting me and the case that I put forth, make your side finally appear like the bully-mentality-bullshit that it is. :D
#309
1harderthanyouthink
1harderthanyouthink's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 256
0
1
3
1harderthanyouthink's avatar
1harderthanyouthink
0
1
3
-->
@RationalMadman
Have fun with your narcissist autofellatio session.
#310
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 564
Posts: 19,930
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
-->
@1harderthanyouthink
7. Fighting Words
Fighting words are posts intended solely to provoke or incite another person into prohibited actions. Fighting words are considered personal attacks, even if they themselves might not meet the abovementioned criteria.
B. The Just Kidding Excuse
The abusive, insulting, or derogatory nature of a comment will be judged based on how a reasonable individual would interpret it. It is not based upon the intentions of speaker, unless those intentions were stated clearly and explicitly prior to the statement of the remark.'Reasonable' interpretation is left to the discretion of the moderators. The “just kidding” argument is not a valid excuse for actions which can reasonably be interpreted as personal attacks.

#311
Castin
Castin's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,222
3
2
7
Castin's avatar
Castin
3
2
7
-->
@1harderthanyouthink
Lol how anyone can say disagree with the substance of what Bossy said is beyond me. If you don't like the work, don't sign up for the job.
How can anyone disagree that it's bad for the site when sabotage overwhelms the capabilities/resources of the moderators.

775 days later

#312
Jasmine
Jasmine's avatar
Debates: 4
Posts: 126
0
3
6
Jasmine's avatar
Jasmine
0
3
6
no.