My latest tthoughts concerning the "problem of evil" argument.

Author: secularmerlin

Posts

Total: 123
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,791
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@GnosticChristianBishop
If subjective, as you say, then show where evil is ever on the good side of a good and evil graph.
what is the difference between a "freedom-fighter" and a "terrorist" ?
GnosticChristianBishop
GnosticChristianBishop's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 361
1
2
3
GnosticChristianBishop's avatar
GnosticChristianBishop
1
2
3
-->
@3RU7AL
I could not refute my claim either.

Regards
DL

109 days later

Shila
Shila's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,743
3
3
5
Shila's avatar
Shila
3
3
5
-->
@GnosticChristianBishop
"Evil is subjective by nature and therefore unless you agree to a common standard with your interlocutor the conversation will break down at "is x really evil though?""

It may be both.

Do you wish to discuss xs or evil?

Evil is objectively always at the end of the graph for good and evil that denotes what we would not prefer.

Evil xs  or issues then would be subjective, as to degree of evil, but always objectively evil.

If subjective, as you say, then show where evil is ever on the good side of a good and evil graph.

Regards
DL
The Jews were given 631 commandment to abstain from evil acts. Note, Jews were committing so many evil acts during the time of Moses that he ran out of tablet space to list them.