Space /\ and Time <--->

Author: ebuc ,

Posts

Total: 16
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,353
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
Space    /\      as minimal shape-of-space { a define area } is a triangle, and as a conicidence is same as my 2ndary symbolism for female woman iis also a triangle  with consciousness /* *\

Time <---> as flow-of-motion { bi-directional } and whereas my 2ndary symbolsim for man with consciousness is *Y*

In the action potential of brain sending signal to muscles to contract, we find, that, it is primarily with the flow of positive sodium ions. SEE link for Action Potential

Wherein, we have male as the positive and negative sodium ions, and female as the  glutamate protein receptors LINK as the portals/gates, allowing sodium ions to flow  into and out of the neuron and instigate the charge neuron to fire its signal to muscles to contract.

Once this signal stops sending, the muscle relaxes and returns to it normal relaxed state.

( @ ) = occupied space Universe

/\ = female space { defined area }

<---> = male time flow as motion

i = Meta-space ego

* * = complex bilateral consciousness, testes, ovaries, eyes, ears etc

(  )(  ) = bi-section/cross-section of a torus

Past >>>> in >> ( * )  ( * ) >>> out >>>> Future

>-------->-------> Arrow of time > ------------->--------------->

<--------<------< Flow of time <----------------<------------<

Past <<<< out <<< ( * ) i  ( * ) <<< in <<< Future
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,873
3
2
7
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
2
7
--> @ebuc

Actually, the minimal shape-of-space  is a sphere, which testes, ovaries and eyes represent.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,353
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
--> @FLRW
Actually, the minimal shape-of-space  is a sphere, which testes, ovaries and eyes represent

2D area shape, is  less than  3D volume shape.

Structural stable shape  also begin with triangulation.

A spherical   teste, ovarie, eye ball, or skull/cranium only exists via triangulation of one sort or another.

The closet occupied space Universe, comes to non-structurally triangulated volume is the very short lived strong nuclear force, the meson { two quark s } altho classified as a bosonic force particle, I believed is composed of only two, 4-fold great tori as extrapolated from the following   link  for meson as 4-folded 2 great circles ---my numerically generated geometric set says it is actually  2 Great Invaginated tori---. 

Remmber two great circles are defined by no less that 360 degrees + 360 degrees and the surfacetotal angular degrees for the 3D tetra{4}hedron is 720 degrees ergo 360 + 360 = 72 degrees, in what ever way we, or meson may make it happen, for very short period of time.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,353
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
--> @FLRW
And here, for clarity's sake, I attempt to make clear, that, since were not dealing with just two abstract Great Circles, rather, were dealing with no less than, 8, occupied space great circles;

...1a} two outer great Gravitational { Meta-physical-3/Spirit-3 }, ---invisible to us because ultra-micro---

.............2a } two great Dark Energy { Meta-physical-4/Spirit-4 } great circles, --invisible to us because ultra-micro000,
 
...1b}  two Great sine-wave circles, and at 90 degrees to those two,

............2b} two great sine-wave circles, and at 90 degree plane to the above sine-wave set.

The Synergetics abstract, two great circles are each between the two sets of sine-wave great circles, that, are on the side of each tori, and we human observe, as the sine-wave association to some if not all known particles.  So you follow this above, FLRW?

We do not observe { quantise } the ultra-micro Gravity and Dark Energy.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,353
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
<--/\--> = Space and Time

How to make the world work ---i.e. not destroy humanity nor the ecological systems that sustain us--- was Fullers lifetime dream. https://www.bfi.org/2012/05/22/making-the-world-work/

....“This all brings us to a realization of the enormous educational task which must be successfully accomplished right now in a hurry in order to convert man’s spin-dive toward oblivion into an intellectually mastered power pullout into safe and level flight of physical and metaphysical success, whereafter he may turn his Spaceship Earth’s occupancy into a universe exploring advantage.”
~ Buckminster Fuller

<--/\--> = Space and Time

@ = finite, occupied space Universe

Meta-space = mind/intellect/concepts/ego etc


...................................................................Meta-space...............................................................

...................................................<--> fertilized ( * * ) egg <-->..............................................................

...................................<--> ( Environment <--> ) * * ( <--> Environment ) <-->.....................................

..<-- macro-infinite non-occupied space (<--> @ * * @ <--> )--> macro-infinite non-occupied space -->..

.....................................................................Meta-space....................................................................


FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,873
3
2
7
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
2
7
--> @ebuc
A new experiment shows space doesn’t exist The idea of a kind of inseparability so far as space and time are concerned was dealt with by John Bell in the 1960s. His idea was that particles – whether of matter or of light, it doesn’t make a difference – don’t really independently exist except as a kind of probabilistic entity. The act of observation causes this mere probabilistic wave function to “collapse,” and the object abruptly materializes as an actual entity in a real location.
With entanglement, two particles are born together and secretly share a wave function. If one is observed, its wave function and that of its twin simultaneously collapse. And they do so regardless of the distance between them.
Even if the twins are separated by half the diameter of the universe, says quantum mechanics, the observation of one twin will cause both to become actual entities. When either is observed, its twin “knows” what happened to its doppelganger (that it came into an actual physical existence as a photon or electron) and instantly assumes the complementary guise – even if its twin is in a different galaxy. During this process no time will elapse, no matter their distance apart. It’s as if there’s no space between them. They’re essentially two sides of the same coin, and distance between them is nonexistent, even if, to us, it’s half the width of the cosmos.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,353
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
--> @FLRW
A new experiment shows space doesn’t exist  
The alledged experiment is false.


When either is observed, its twin “knows” what happened to its doppelganger (that it came into an actual physical existence as a photon or electron) and instantly assumes the complementary guise – even if its twin is in a different galaxy.
Where is the experiments of both these false claims.

During this process no time will elapse, no matter their distance apart. It’s as if there’s no space between them. They’re essentially two sides of the same coin, and distance between them is nonexistent, even if, to us, it’s half the width of the cosmos.

Again experiments that have reached false conclusions. Space and time exists.

All of you above is little bit like what Ive been informing others here for years, that jacob Bekenstiens black hole mathematics ---and his later holographic ideas and 'Bekentstiens Bound'--- led him to the conclusion, that, ..' we appear to be 2D creatures having the illusion of 3D'..... and this has to do with the 2D event horizon being representative of what is inside the 3D black hole.

There are no experiments that prove any of yours or Jacob Bekenstiens mathematics.  Hawking and Bekenstien verified each others mathematics for much of black holes along with R. Penrose. It is all conjecture.

Regarding the twin particles, what we know, is that when we observe ones spin state, we know the others is the opposite.  That is all we know.







zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 6,910
3
3
4
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
4
--> @ebuc @FLRW
Space and Time are intangible  possibilities.....No more, no less....Though humans typically like to redefine and therefore overcomplicate the base reality of possibility.

The crux of all issues is matter, and it's associated events and duration.



If not, then explain how No Space and No time is a possibility.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,353
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
--> @zedvictor4
If not, then explain how No Space and No time is a possibility.

I never proposed no space and no time.

Even 2D area is a space.  And Ive never proposed only a 2D space existence.

Some may say there is no time via all we ever experience is the eternal ' now '. Past and future do not exist.

However, the eternal occurs in time periods of here to then,  and we measure them via finite clocks ergo, finite time periods.

There are no experiments that prove that space and time do not exist. There only maths whose resultants infer a no time and no space illusion of  3D Universe in and an eternally existent in finite { discrete sets }, of 1D Time.

Past >>>> in >> ( * ) ( * ) >>> out >>>> Future

>-------->--------> Arrow-of-time > ------------->--------------->

<--------<--------< Flow < of < time <----------------<------------<

Past <<<< out <<< ( * ) i  ( * ) <<< in <<< Future

( @ ) = occupied space Universe

/\ = female space { defined area } and an integral set of three defined areas defines an non-specified volume and specifically this would be the octa{8}hedron.

<---> = male time flow as motion, left-right spin, expansion-contraction, etc

i = Meta-space ego

* * = complex bilateral consciousness, testes, ovaries, eyes, ears etc

(  )(  ) = bi-section/cross-section of a torus

Equanimity and singularity never exist. Space and time Universe is always off-center aka tainted.

This LINK says fundamentals of charge fall away so does mass and that isopin may be fundamental, not charge.




Deb-8-a-bull
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,674
3
2
3
Deb-8-a-bull's avatar
Deb-8-a-bull
3
2
3
What about a 2D area of space in a vacuum.
Before , during and after the vacuum.  
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,353
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
--> @Deb-8-a-bull
You tell me, what about it.  I dont see the significance or relevance of your comment..

Any 3D polyhedron has 2D faces.  So what? Old news.

The macro-infinite, truly non-occupied space, is the only true vacuum  and has not relevance to our 3D + time occupied space Universe, other than, it allows for expansion and contraction of our finite Universe.  Really no other relevance that I can see, except for, if it is a true vacuum, then isnt it trying to suck our finite Universe apart?

I researched this some years back and forget what others were saying, in those regards.  Ultimately Gravity decides the fate of our finite Universe.
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 6,910
3
3
4
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
4
--> @Deb-8-a-bull
I agree.

I've got an old red tartan one and as I prefer tea I just use it for hot water and keep the teabags separate.

Though I do occasionally have hot chocolate, which stays hot during.

And I always wash it out afterwards.

Before the vacuum people drank a lot more cider.


Is this helpful?
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,873
3
2
7
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
2
7
--> @ebuc @zedvictor4

Hey guys, our time machine works. Look at the time of my post commenting on Danielle's  future comment.

ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,353
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
--> @FLRW
Moody Blues song....' speeding through the Universe, thinking is the best way to travel.....

...its all dream, life passsing by on a stream'...   or something like that, I forget


Some of images in the vid are from 60's tv show 'The Time Tunnel'.
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,353
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4

I came across this vid and took a peek. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kuRatz2rj0

Some abstract formula for various forces of Universe and I basically dont like math much, however, I has patience

Still I had a look and three times, I nearly stopped because the formula and abstracts mostly over my head, yet this person had a way of communicating the points he was trying to across to the reader.  He does that very effectively.  i was happy to find his presentation included three numerical sets/patterns for functions of Universe, of interest to me, as well as confirming finite limits mass, space and time ergo integrity of Universe is via finite limits. No infinites of occupied space.

Generally tho, you dont have to grasp the formual, only listen carefully to the processes that lead to the conclusions he has to present.

He makes clear, to reader, why  mass --see around 9:00--- has limits.  Then space.  So he has to detour here to understand why there is space limit for occupied space.  This is one those places, where detours make you want to stop following along. Patients is required, but I found it worth while ti my time, each time he needs to do this to understand why his conclusions are what they are, finite.

So for space, at about 16:00 to 17:54 ---the planck length--he explains why we have the space limit 19^ -35 and this is where a black hole is created. Then the planck mass finite limit follows.


At 19:00> he brings out a primary three set, and leads along his pathway of why these limits exist.

Then at 20:00 he takes his 2nd detour into units. Again, I thought of stopping there, however, patience paid off for me. Cause he lays out
7 base units.

At 22:25 or so, he then explains how planck lenght was found by Mr Max Planck.

At 25:00 he shows the real conclusion to planck length, planck time and planck mass

At 26:17, the question arises, what happen before the big bang, his response ensues. Quantum Gravity { gravitons }
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,873
3
2
7
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
2
7
--> @ebuc

Now this is the type of post I enjoy. Along with this video there is another one listed on the page called , God is not a Good Theory (Sean Carroll).