An abortion conundrum

Author: Bones

Posts

Total: 34
#31
ebuc
ebuc's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 4,264
3
2
4
ebuc's avatar
ebuc
3
2
4
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
They shoukd call them" 1 week babies" . " 2 week babies "
False. They are fetus/babys and more fetus than that are live,  indepent, individual, living baby, until the umbilical cord is cut, and the baby has taken its first inspiration of breath.

Why people  want to not see is truth is sometimes very obvious and others times not so obvious why they do not seek truth.
 

48 days later

#32
DebateAllDaTings
DebateAllDaTings's avatar
Debates: 2
Posts: 78
0
1
2
DebateAllDaTings's avatar
DebateAllDaTings
0
1
2
-->
@Double_R
"If all 30 of those women have decided that they do not wish for their body to be used to carry the pregnancy to terms, I’d rather perform 30 1st trimester abortions."

Why are their wishes relevant? When should anyone have their "wish" granted to kill innocent human life? 


#33
FLRW
FLRW's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 5,112
3
4
8
FLRW's avatar
FLRW
3
4
8

God, by killing some babies by pediatric cancer, shows that he is fine with abortion.

16 days later

#34
TWS1405
TWS1405's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 1,048
3
4
7
TWS1405's avatar
TWS1405
3
4
7
-->
@Bones
The obvious answer is 1.

Until the actual point of viability, the pregnancy has no materialistic, social, cultural, psychological and/or legal value.

More than that, this planet simply cannot sustain any more consumers of finite resources. 

Though it is comedy, Bill Maher here has a very direct and poignant point. Let the population collapse!!!!