That's a really nice family you got there, would be a shame if something were to happen to them.
And you somehow can get in his head to determine there’s ill intent? There is more than one way to interpret that statement, which is basically he said she said. You’re going to need something more concrete than that lol.
That's literally what these hearings are about.
So where’s the quote where Trump said storm the Capitol and kill Pence. I’ll wait. Because according to the Court, that’s what he needs to do.
And I can tell you the moon is made of cheese, which is my opinion and based on some fact. Turns out that whenever you are free to make up definitions you get to say whatever you want.
Are you arguing that Wisconsin Executives acted in a Constitutional manner during the 2020 election? The Supreme Court of Wisconsin would beg to differ. You run an election illegally, the result is obviously…wait for it, illegal.
Rewriting the rules on voting in order to account for the conditions created by a pandemic is not only not "stealing an election", it's one of three most basic reasonabilities a government/legislature has. The fact that you disagree with those rules does not change that.
This makes absolutely no sense. The Constitution and laws of Wisconsin did not give Executive Officials in the State Board the right to create drop boxes. The Wisconsin Legislature never passed a bill allowing drop boxes, hence it’s illegal. You’re there one disagreeing with the rules here when the highest court in WI literally ruled it was illegal and a usurpation of the authority of the legislature. Executives don’t make laws, the legislature does.
No one changed to rules to say that black people get to vote twice, or that illegals get to vote. All they did was make voting more convenient for people who feared COVID and to help prevent public spread.
Which does not make the use of drop boxes legal. If you want to change the law, the legislature must pass it and the Governor must sign it. That’s how checks and balances work, or do you believe in fascist power of Governor Evers?
To call that "stealing an election" is ridiculous. If the drop boxes weren't there those voters would have just voted elsewhere.
You and I both know that’s not true lol. How do we know? Because above you mentioned convenience above. More votes when it’s convenient or inconvenient?
And if your argument is that many of them wouldn't have voted at all then you're literally arguing that the election was stolen because republicans were not allowed to stop enough democratic voters from voting. That's beyond absurd.
Oh no, I’m all for them voting. But it’s a same you think executives have the authority to create their own laws to abide by. A person who wants to vote will vote anyway. The issue of whether dropboxes should be legal is a whole different issue. The fact here is they were illegal and the executives did them anyways in violation of the law. Period. Full stop.
We're not talking about the judicial process. This is a Congressional hearing. The topic in this thread is about what you, as a Trump supporter, think about the actual evidence of the case. You know, the thing you have completely avoided discussing?
Oh you mean the evidence you or the committee has failed to provide where Trump directly told the people to storm the Capitol and kill Pence? Impeachment already failed my man. All you have left is a criminal trial and that is governed by Brandenburg v Ohio.
I don't care about your legal ducks and dodges, do you have an actual opinion on the reasonableness of the committee's findings based on the evidence they have presented?
Yes. A criminal case of Donald Trump, which is all the committee can seek at this point would fail based on the facets provided under Brandenburg v Ohio. It really says a lot though that you don’t care about the legal nuances.
The Pentagon refuses to release the footage of flight 77. Let's all march to demand they tell us what they're hiding.
I’m all for it. I’m all for lobbying the government to tell us everything about JFK assassination and aliens. What’s funny is that the FBI refuses to provide material information that could prove that people were ordered to incite people by the government itself. I think that’s relevant to finding out what happened. Don’t you? Ofc you don’t because you’ve blinded yourself to Orangman bad.
Anyone can insinuate conspiracy garbage behind the veil of just asking questions. Make a claim and support your claim, then I will be happy to address.
Ray Epps was a fed who incited the crowd and cause people to break into the Capitol. My support? He hasn’t been charged with anything while the other people have.
When the US president is a democrat they're responsible for literally everything, including globally high gas prices and another country on the other side of the world invading it's neighbor.
I would be more than happy to learn which checks and balances prevent the President from not approving pipelines. I would also like to know what prevents the President from giving oil from the strategic reserve to the China.
In case you haven’t gotten it yet, this is a false equivalency fallacy. I provided an example of checks and balances. Show me the checks and balances that have forced Biden to allow the price increases. I could name 5 situations where he pen cause gas price increases.
But when they're a republican they're not even responsible for the federal government's response to the US Capitol being overrun by mob rioters.
Cause the District of Columbia is within the jurisdiction of Congress and through it the Mayor of DC., not the President. All of this is in the Constitution.
Your partisan hackery is showing.
You resort to false equivalency fallacies to somehow prove I’m being partisan, when it’s your sides advocacy of the Green New Deal and Medicare for All that costs trillions which are contributing to prices increases for gasoline.
If we had your way, the Democrats would accuse Trump of occupying the Capitol with troops and forcibly stealing the election. Checks and balances exist to protect both sides. Trump already delegated the power to bring the NG to his SecDef. The delay came because of logistical issues. That’s what Chris Millers testimony said, which surprisingly hasn’t been aired on the committee. I wonder why?
