My dissatisfaction with ties and unmoderated debates

Author: Intelligence_06 ,

Posts

Total: 45
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 161
0
3
4
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
0
3
4
Reading problems are problems of reading. That is how English works. No contention on that. If you don't understand how English works, maybe I can send you some resources.
Yes same meaning, that's why I understood it. I am criticizing the retarded way you worded it. "Problems of reading" is not correct. It's how a non native English speaker would construct the sentence. A lot of languages construct sentences that way, particularly latin based languages. It's not normal for a native English speaker to form sentences that way. 

It's actually so unnatural to form sentences that way, only a retard who thinks it makes him sound smarter will go out of their way to form sentences like that
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 161
0
3
4
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
0
3
4
I am Chinese, and not a native English speaker. How does it feel when a Chinese kid can use English in more ways than you? It means you can do better?
That makes it more understandable. I'd tone down the big words than, you are more than likely using them wrong and it could be why judges are going to punish you. As for the request to name one judge, it's not possible to know who was biased and likely if somebody was biased they would be too embarrassed to admit it. You can be sure that bias has occurred though. Sorry China Boy. I also want to apologize that your country was taken over by an anti Chinese regime that hates China. It must suck to have a leader that hates China as all members of the CCP do
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 404
Posts: 14,752
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
--> @WyIted
Eh… no comment on that. You can live yours, and I should be able to live mine.
So I assume this means 

"You can live your life and I will live my life"

This is the issue with your writing problems and is a direct result of some sort of cognitive impairment. 

If you didn't immediately understand that's what he meant, maybe you are cognitively impaired but unlike you, I don't go around demeaning the cognitively impaired.
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 161
0
3
4
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
0
3
4
--> @RationalMadman
unlike you, I don't go around demeaning the cognitively impaired.
How am I supposed to know I am a retard if you never remind me? You have a moral obligation to call me a retard if I was one. 

You have no ideal how much I dread knowing it's quite possible I am literally mentally retarded, but everyone around me is too polite to tell me. 

Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 89
Posts: 2,804
4
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
4
8
11
--> @WyIted
You have no ideal how much I dread knowing it's quite possible I am literally mentally retarded, but everyone around me is too polite to tell me. 
So you go around mocking other people for their way of writing on the internet and even their national identity because that is TOTALLY how you deal with the problem and not make it worse.

ComputerNerd
ComputerNerd's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 75
0
1
8
ComputerNerd's avatar
ComputerNerd
0
1
8
--> @Intelligence_06
Joke Debates are a subjective matter. The description stated that which ever side the voter found the funniest, they would vote for. 

I can't explain why I found Conservallectuals side funnier, just the same way I can't explain why I love chicken noodles so much (I do). If you really want an explanation, you took this too seriously, with 3-4 jokes slipped in, while Conservallectual made their jokes open. 

TBH, both sides were unfunny, but at least Conservallectual TRIED to actually be funny. 


WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 161
0
3
4
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
0
3
4
--> @Intelligence_06
mocking other people for their way of writing on the internet and even their national 
I actually love Chinese people. Your nation is a great nation. I am sorry that people who hate China have taken it over. If I was Chinese I would be fighting against the CCP because they are anti Chinese and any ody who supports them hates China. 
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 404
Posts: 14,752
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
--> @WyIted
No you wouldn't, you absolute spineless coward.

When we had our rivalry in the election you prided yourself on how you brownnose whiteflame and have a better relations with the very mod that later banned you LOL! Or do you accept him scapegoating it to Ragnar?

You have preached to Barney/Ragnar himself about how to blindly follow what your boss tells you even if it's dumb as recently as a week ago if I recall.

You are not a real rebel and preach a lot of things you won't do.
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 89
Posts: 2,804
4
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
4
8
11
--> @WyIted
You must like Chiang Kai Shek then. Is that it?
zedvictor4
zedvictor4's avatar
Debates: 19
Posts: 7,112
3
3
4
zedvictor4's avatar
zedvictor4
3
3
4
--> @Intelligence_06
Debating within this format is a very random affair, prone to all sorts of unregulated influences.

Voting is inevitably going to be biased, moderation is biased and whimsical, and ELO is a bit of statistical fancy.

Definitely not to be taken too seriously.

Best just to just enjoy the compositional and mental exercises and then move on to the next, when you have the time and your busy (real life) schedule allows of course.

3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 11,524
3
4
8
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
8
--> @WyIted
All individuals are external 
do you ever dream ?
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 161
0
3
4
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
0
3
4
--> @RationalMadman
Or do you accept him scapegoating it to Ragnar?

I assume here is how the conversation took place .

Supa- let's not ban him that's not even really a doc, it is just wylted wanting to inform the authorities of a likely pedophile.

Ragnar-lets give wylted a lifetime ban

Whiteflame- let's be reasonable and give wylted a 30 day ban

Then Ragnar cries like a bitch for a while and they negotiate a 90 day ban. 

Even with me saying that. I absolutely could work with and have a civil relationship with Ragnar as president as well. 

An election you win, would absolutely neuter the position, and to be honest Airmax has not caused any real damage to the position so it wasn't a mistake backing him. The other candidate would have also caused damage to the position so it's good he lost as well
WyIted
WyIted's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 161
0
3
4
WyIted's avatar
WyIted
0
3
4
--> @3RU7AL
do you ever dream ?
Don't be obtuse. You know the people you see in dreams are not actual consciousness.
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 11,524
3
4
8
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
8
--> @WyIted
Don't be obtuse. You know the people you see in dreams are not actual consciousness.
about 90+% of the "internal dialog" you imagine "other people" are having "in their own heads"

is you projecting
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 89
Posts: 2,804
4
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
4
8
11
--> @3RU7AL
The entire reason I have wrote this is that I assume Wyited will just assume this means "everyone except him" due to that since he dismiss my logic-based language as "retarded pussy language" or something, I assume he would interpret everything in common sense, which is what this would mean to almost anyone else. In that case, he has essentially hit himself with the foot by not understanding what I have meant.
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 89
Posts: 2,804
4
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
4
8
11
--> @WyIted
You know the people you see in dreams are not actual consciousness.
I don't. What if you are dreamin'? What if I am just a manifestation of your deepest and darkest fears? You don't know. If you can prove it, do so. If you can't, well, I will consider you convinced.

Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 89
Posts: 2,804
4
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
4
8
11
--> @ComputerNerd
No, I am not saying what you did was wrong. I am not saying that you are saying anything, but you really are not at fault at anything here.

We did not take this debate seriously, and you didn't, and that was understandable. What was not was that the fact this debate is in a rated state, while unmoderated. Your vote is valid in any measure for an unmoderated and unrated debate, and non-valid for any debate that is moderated. I am just saying that all debates that are rated should be moderated. Either moderation, or unratation(that is a word, or is it not?). Ignore Wyited.
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 89
Posts: 2,804
4
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
4
8
11
--> @zedvictor4
The fact is that moderation has mostly been fair, for me at least. I believe this is not an act of bad mod behavior. In fact, if the mods can give a good enough explanation, they will. What I am discontent with is the flaw of the system, that rated debates somehow can be unmoderated means that anarchy and warfare can essentially replace order and justice and voters can just manipulate the leaderboard without the debaters having anything to say. Sure, the ELO is indeed just internet points after all and are no more meaningful than instagram likes, but it is true that for me, ELO has always been just all 2 years before today, and somehow it just broke.

I have to accept this "loss" anyways, but that doesn't mean I give in to the system. Before the introduction of a related new rule, I suggest everyone making their joke debates unrated, because I don't want your internet points manipulated by other people without the Mods having anything to do.
RationalMadman
RationalMadman's avatar
Debates: 404
Posts: 14,752
10
11
11
RationalMadman's avatar
RationalMadman
10
11
11
--> @WyIted
I smell establishment.
Nyxified
Nyxified's avatar
Debates: 16
Posts: 170
1
3
9
Nyxified's avatar
Nyxified
1
3
9
--> @Intelligence_06
I think a no-vote debate shouldn't result in any change in rating. A tied debate that has one or more votes could result in an appropriate change in rating.