CHALLENGE

Author: Vici

Posts

Total: 33
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
Who's the best debater here? I wish to challenge them.
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
I think I am a capable debater - I only forfeited because of personal isuses. 
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
Like oramagi just gets wins by farming noobs so i need a real challenge. 

ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,901
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
A jockey's lack of skill/knowledge can ruin the race for the horse, but the horse is the one who runs fast. The best jockey with a mediocre horse will not win, while some horses don't need a jockey to win at all.

The debator's horse is reality. If your conclusion is true you have all the advantages, if it is false you have a multitude of vulnerabilities.

A person who manages to speak in such a way that the unwise think him equally correct when he speaks falsehoods as when he speaks truth is a sophist (modern sense).
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 167
Posts: 3,837
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
Don’t start by challenging the best guy here. Just instigate debates that are controversial.
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@Intelligence_06
well oragami accepted, probs bc he thinks im some noob. 
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
he's about to lose - the pro choice stance canont be proved. 
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@Intelligence_06
you too, i bet you didnt see my argumnt coming 
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 167
Posts: 3,837
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@Vici
I don't know if you know this, but this trick is as old as Sir Walter Raleigh in American History. You are gonna take a lot more than that.
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@Intelligence_06
lets see what you can do with like a 500 character limit. It's gg for you , first you than the ukraine oro guy 
Intelligence_06
Intelligence_06's avatar
Debates: 167
Posts: 3,837
5
8
11
Intelligence_06's avatar
Intelligence_06
5
8
11
-->
@Vici
The last time I was this cocky I got beaten by Oromagi. Yeah, be careful about it.
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,689
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Vici
lets see what you can do with like a 500 character limit. It's gg for you , first you than the ukraine oro guy 
gg, vici! 

Please VOTE CON!



BearMan
BearMan's avatar
Debates: 16
Posts: 1,067
3
4
11
BearMan's avatar
BearMan
3
4
11
-->
@Vici

ADreamOfLiberty
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
Debates: 0
Posts: 2,901
3
2
2
ADreamOfLiberty's avatar
ADreamOfLiberty
3
2
2
-->
@Intelligence_06
You were probably "beaten" because people like to punish pride.
Athias
Athias's avatar
Debates: 20
Posts: 3,192
3
3
9
Athias's avatar
Athias
3
3
9
-->
@Vici
....not going well?
3RU7AL
3RU7AL's avatar
Debates: 3
Posts: 13,551
3
4
9
3RU7AL's avatar
3RU7AL
3
4
9
-->
@Vici
Who's the best debater here? I wish to challenge them.
Novice_II
Novice_II's avatar
Debates: 98
Posts: 174
2
6
6
Novice_II's avatar
Novice_II
2
6
6
-->
@Vici
the pro choice stance canont be proved. 
  • You are correct, and I am considering casting a vote for you here. I will however inform you that oromagi is not the best debater on this site, and frankly, is not even close to such category (there are obviously much better debaters). Unfortunately, I will also inform you that most of the top leaderboard debaters are scared of accepting challenges, and/or like one has done here, will take any opportunity to argue in bad faith.

Novice_II
Novice_II's avatar
Debates: 98
Posts: 174
2
6
6
Novice_II's avatar
Novice_II
2
6
6
-->
@Vici
Like oromagi just gets wins by farming noobs so i need a real challenge. 
  • I believe I will also confirm this proposition, especially as one who believes he should have lost to both Jeff Goldblum and myself, but I think what you ought to do is re make your debate, re-frame it, and hold the same contest. Here is my immediate suggestion: 
Resolved: The majority of abortion is immoral.
Abortion: The deliberate termination of a pregnancy growing in-utero
Majority: Over 50%
  1.  Miscarriages, and ectopic pregnancy terminations are not abortions and attempting to label them within the debate as such will result in an automatic loss. 
  2.  Sources may not be posted in the comments and dong so will result in an automatic loss. 
  3.  Burden of proof is shared and con must prove that the majority of abortion is not immoral. Attempting to shit the burden of proof will result in an automatic loss. 



oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,689
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Novice_II
good advice.  Also-

define terms in the description of the debate. 
define every noun, verb, adjective, and adverb in your thesis statement.
Use mainstream popular sources but don't be afraid to choose the sense of the word that best supports your case.

setting a "no trolls or kritiks, please" rule in description gets the VOTERS on your side in the case of any semantic fuckery.
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@oromagi
you are literally a piece of scum who snipes opponents and picks at debates from corners which are clearly not within the parameters of a debate. Why do i need to put in the description "no fuckery" - why cant people here just be decent - obviously, fuckery is not desirable so why do it? There's a reason you debated me (new user) as opposed to someone like misterchris or bones in abortion. 
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@Athias
i accidentally made the debate time 2 hours. Also, oro commited fuckery, which is the only way he can win. I assure you, if terms are defined and oro is prohibited from his fuckery, he would get clapped up. 
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@Novice_II
make your debate, re-frame it, and hold the same contest.
lmao good one he wont. 
oromagi
oromagi's avatar
Debates: 117
Posts: 8,689
8
10
11
oromagi's avatar
oromagi
8
10
11
-->
@Vici
-->@oromagi
you are literally a piece of scum who snipes opponents and picks at debates from corners which are clearly not within the parameters of a debate. Why do i need to put in the description "no fuckery" - why cant people here just be decent - obviously, fuckery is not desirable so why do it?
Because some  pieces of scum try to snipe opponent with little bits of semantic fuckery like this-

and then brag about their fuckery like this:

 i bet you didnt see my argumnt coming 


Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@BearMan
i know everything - my street name is omnipotent tent (i know everythign and everythign is in me). dunning kruger effect is a terrible thing which is being instilled into the youth by blue pill liberals - this notion that we are all "good great people who ought to be accepted", instead of calling a silly socialist a silly socialist and calling it what it is.  
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@oromagi
Because some  pieces of scum try to snipe opponent with little bits of semantic fuckery like this-
you want to talk about semantics but like 99 of ur wins is from farming people deader than stones, and using this "kritik" thing, which just a nice fancy way of saying fuckery. 

and then brag about their fuckery like this:

 i bet you didnt see my argumnt coming 
do you want to debate? now that i know how this site works and the tiem argument stuff, i can properly and utterly destroy you, when i need to. 
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
i have weapons of mass destruction which you cannot handle - they will be brought out when least expected
BearMan
BearMan's avatar
Debates: 16
Posts: 1,067
3
4
11
BearMan's avatar
BearMan
3
4
11
-->
@Vici
okay bozo
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@BearMan
you are literally the embodiment of dunning kruger if you believe that your stipulation "okay bozo" provides a sufficient falsification by which renders by opination nullified.  
Vici
Vici's avatar
Debates: 11
Posts: 333
2
4
7
Vici's avatar
Vici
2
4
7
-->
@BearMan
are a bearman because YOU CAN BARELY BARE THE WEIGHT OF LOGIC CRUSHING YOU FACTS DONT CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS
BearMan
BearMan's avatar
Debates: 16
Posts: 1,067
3
4
11
BearMan's avatar
BearMan
3
4
11
-->
@Vici
lmfao bro okay but did i ask??????

rip bozo 2022

hehehehaw!