-->
@Avery
And like my example with Bobby Fischer, you can be very intelligent at one thing (chess) and a total idiot in the realm of politics.
The sum of the outcomes of one's intelligence is what I would classify a person as "smart"
.. a total idiot in the realm of politics.The sum of the outcomes of one's intelligence is what I would classify a person as "smart"
What do you mean? Do you not consider Bobby Fischer to be intelligent? Do you think he was a "smart" man?
So you are a conservative and an atheist. You must lead a very lonely life. It’s pretty hard to put those two beliefs together.
Look, I would agree that Progressivism is a failed, cancerous ideology. But I don't think we can write off people who believe in it as having negative IQ. They just believe a lot of wrong, ideological things.
A smart person who starts out with the wrong assumptions is much more dangerous than a dumb person
>@ADreamOfLiberty--> @ShilaOnce again statistics is wielded by those who don't know the rules.More likely given the same circumstances or more likely per total population? No doubt the number you quote is the later. There is no contradiction, and the in-circumstance statistic is more relevant since it speaks to the presumption you expressed.TWS1405 was trained in law enforcement. His incompetency is expected.